Literature DB >> 15534515

Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty.

Michael E Berend1, Merrill A Ritter, John B Meding, Philip M Faris, E Michael Keating, Ryan Redelman, Gregory W Faris, Kenneth E Davis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the failure mechanisms and factors associated with failure of a nonmodular metal backed cemented tibial component. Out of 3152 total knee replacements done for osteoarthritis, 41 tibial components had been revised (1.3%). Four distinct failure mechanisms were identified: 20 knees were revised for medial bone collapse, 13 for ligamentous imbalance, 6 for progressive radiolucencies, and 2 for pain. Factors associated with medial bone collapse were varus tibial component alignment more than 3.0 degrees , Body Mass Index higher than 33.7, and overall postoperative varus limb alignment. Ligamentous imbalance was more prevalent in knees with preoperative valgus deformity. There were no knees revised for tibial component polyethylene wear or osteolysis. We conclude that the dominant failure mechanisms for this component design are related to preoperative deformity, technical factors of component alignment, overall limb alignment, and ligamentous imbalance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15534515     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000148578.22729.0e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  147 in total

1.  The limits of precision in conventionally instrumented computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R E da Assunção; N J Hancock; W J M Bruce; P Walker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Update in orthopedics.

Authors:  Catalin Cirstoiu; Razvan Ene; Dan Popescu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2011-01

3.  Centre of the posterior cruciate ligament and the sulcus between tubercle spines are reliable landmarks for tibial component placement.

Authors:  Namık Sahin; Teoman Atıcı; Ünal Kurtoğlu; Ali Turgut; Güven Ozkaya; Yüksel Ozkan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; Klaus-Peter Günther; Stephan Kirschner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Lawrence Joseph; David J Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The peel in total knee revision: exposure in the difficult knee.

Authors:  Carlos Lavernia; Juan Salvador Contreras; Jose Carlos Alcerro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Three-dimensional analysis of image-free navigation system for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D Tigani; E Rimondi; P Trentani; M Ansaloni; L Amendola; D Testi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2010-12-29

8.  Patients with no functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty show different kinematics.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; Stephan Kirschner; Klaus-Peter Günther; Melinda K Harman
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Medial parapatellar approach leads to internal rotation of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Filippo-Franco Schiapparelli; Felix Amsler; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Patient-specific positioning guides do not consistently achieve the planned implant position in UKA.

Authors:  Justin A M J van Leeuwen; Stephan M Röhrl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.