Literature DB >> 30206354

Psychosocial and behavioral outcomes of genomic testing in cancer: a systematic review.

Tatiane Yanes1,2, Amanda M Willis3, Bettina Meiser3, Katherine M Tucker3,4, Megan Best5,6.   

Abstract

Psychosocial and behavioral outcomes of genetic testing in oncology are well known, however, it is unclear how these findings will generalize to more complex genomic testing. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the psychosocial and behavioral outcomes of cancer genomic testing. Studies were selected for inclusion if they were published from January 2003 to January 2017 and addressed psychological and behavioral outcomes of cancer genomic testing in adults. A review of four databases identified 9620 abstracts, with 22 publications meeting the inclusion criteria. Of the included articles, 11 studies reported on outcomes of germline testing, with three articles assessing panel testing and eight SNP testing. No studies assessed the outcomes of WGS or WES. Eleven articles assessed the outcomes of somatic testing, including testing for cancer prognosis and for personalized therapies. Studies were biased toward breast cancer and Caucasian women with high education and socioeconomic status. While studies demonstrated limited adverse psychological outcomes associated with genomic testing, a lack of consistency in psychosocial measures precluded any meta-analysis. Changes in health behavior following positive results were limited, and in some cases risk perception was not altered following genomic testing. There is limited evidence of adverse psychosocial outcomes and changes in health behavior following genomic testing to assess cancer risk. Findings from this review highlight the need for longitudinal research with superior methodological and theoretical design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30206354      PMCID: PMC6303287          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0257-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  33 in total

1.  Patient experiences with gene panels based on exome sequencing in clinical diagnostics: high acceptance and low distress.

Authors:  A S Sie; J B Prins; W A G van Zelst-Stams; J A Veltman; I Feenstra; N Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact of Giving Information on Personalized Genomic Risk of Melanoma to the Public.

Authors:  Amelia K Smit; David Espinoza; Ainsley J Newson; Rachael L Morton; Georgina Fenton; Lucinda Freeman; Kate Dunlop; Phyllis N Butow; Matthew H Law; Michael G Kimlin; Louise A Keogh; Suzanne J Dobbinson; Judy Kirk; Peter A Kanetsky; Graham J Mann; Anne E Cust
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Knowledge of genomic testing among early-stage breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Alice R Richman; Janice P Tzeng; Lisa A Carey; Valesca P Retèl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  "It's all very well reading the letters in the genome, but it's a long way to being able to write": Men's interpretations of undergoing genetic profiling to determine future risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Bancroft; Elena Castro; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Clare Moynihan; Elizabeth Page; Natalie Taylor; Rosalind A Eeles; Emma Rowley; Karen Cox
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Impact of Panel Gene Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer on Patients.

Authors:  Heidi S Lumish; Hallie Steinfeld; Carrie Koval; Donna Russo; Elana Levinson; Julia Wynn; James Duong; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Behavioral and psychosocial responses to genomic testing for colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Rachel Nusbaum; Yasmin Salehizadeh; Gillian W Hooker; Beth N Peshkin; Morgan Butrick; William Tuong; Jeena Mathew; David Goerlitz; Mary B Fishman; Peter G Shields; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 5.736

7.  'A low risk is still a risk': exploring women's attitudes towards genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in order to target disease prevention.

Authors:  L Henneman; D R Timmermans; C M Bouwman; M C Cornel; H Meijers-Heijboer
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Access to personalized medicine: factors influencing the use and value of gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Y Bombard; L Rozmovits; M Trudeau; N B Leighl; K Deal; D A Marshall
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Breast cancer patients' views on the use of genomic testing to guide decisions about their postoperative chemotherapy.

Authors:  V Seror; P Marino; F Bertucci; J Mancini; J-M Extra; J-M Ferrero; T Bachelot; P Viens; C Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Cost-effectiveness and Benefit-to-Harm Ratio of Risk-Stratified Screening for Breast Cancer: A Life-Table Model.

Authors:  Nora Pashayan; Steve Morris; Fiona J Gilbert; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more
  14 in total

1.  Genetic counseling and testing for Asian Americans: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Young; Julie Mak; Talia Stanley; Michelle Bass; Mildred K Cho; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Advanced Cancer Patient Knowledge of and Attitudes towards Tumor Molecular Profiling.

Authors:  Grace Davies; Phyllis Butow; Christine E Napier; Nicci Bartley; Ilona Juraskova; Bettina Meiser; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Timothy E Schlub; Megan C Best
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 3.  Patient experience of uncertainty in cancer genomics: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicci Bartley; Christine Napier; Megan Best; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Patient Knowledge and Attitudes towards Genetic Testing in Parkinson's Disease Subjects with Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Avram Fraint; Bichun Ouyang; Leonard Verhagen Metman; Carolyn Jones; Deborah A Hall; Karen Marder; Gian Pal
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2019-04-21

5.  Information, communication, and cancer patients' trust in the physician: what challenges do we have to face in an era of precision cancer medicine?

Authors:  Theresia Pichler; Amy Rohrmoser; Anne Letsch; C Benedikt Westphalen; Ulrich Keilholz; Volker Heinemann; Mario Lamping; Philipp J Jost; Kristina Riedmann; Peter Herschbach; Ute Goerling
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Employees' Views and Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Assessment of Voluntary Workplace Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Kunal Sanghavi; W Gregory Feero; Debra J H Mathews; Anya E R Prince; Lori Lyn Price; Edison T Liu; Kyle B Brothers; J Scott Roberts; Charles Lee
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Psychological Distress and Coping Ability of Women at High Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer before Undergoing Genetic Counseling-An Exploratory Study from Germany.

Authors:  Beate Vajen; Magdalena Rosset; Hannah Wallaschek; Eva Baumann; Brigitte Schlegelberger
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06

9.  Regarding the Yin and Yang of Precision Cancer- Screening and Treatment: Are We Creating a Neglected Majority?

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Yue Guan; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Evaluating the Integration of Genomics into Cancer Screening Programmes: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Sarah Briggs; Ingrid Slade
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2019-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.