Literature DB >> 29199389

Development and Evaluation of a Telephone Communication Protocol for the Delivery of Personalized Melanoma Genomic Risk to the General Population.

Georgina L Fenton1, Amelia K Smit1, Lucinda Freeman1, Caro Badcock1, Kate Dunlop2, Phyllis N Butow3, Judy Kirk4,5,6, Anne E Cust7,8.   

Abstract

Communicating personalized genomic risk results for common diseases to the general population as a form of tailored prevention is novel and may require alternative genetic counseling service delivery models. We describe the development and evaluation of a communication protocol for disclosing melanoma genomic risk information to the asymptomatic general population and assess participants' satisfaction and acceptability. Participants (n = 117) were aged 22-69 years, living in New South Wales, Australia and unselected for family history. They provided a saliva sample and had genomic testing for melanoma for low to moderate penetrant melanoma susceptibility variants in 21 genes. Participants could choose to receive their results from a genetic counselor via telephone, followed by a mailed booklet or to receive their risk result via mailed booklet only with a follow-up call for those at high risk. A follow-up questionnaire was completed by 85% of participants 3-months later. Most participants (80%) elected to receive their result via telephone. Participants were highly satisfied with the delivery of results (mean 3.4 out of 4, standard deviation 0.5), and this did not differ by delivery mode, risk category, age or sex. On follow-up, 75% accurately recalled their risk category, 6% indicated a preference for a different delivery mode, either electronic or face-to-face. The process of disclosing genomic risk results to the general population over the telephone with accompanying written material was feasible and acceptable, and may be useful for communicating polygenic risk for common diseases in the context of increasing demands for genomic testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication protocol; Genetic counseling; Genomic testing; Melanoma; Patient satisfaction; Service delivery model; Telephone

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29199389     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0183-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  38 in total

1.  Reducing death from melanoma and standards of evidence.

Authors:  Martin A Weinstock
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs.

Authors:  Tara J Schmidlen; Lisa Wawak; Rachel Kasper; J Felipe García-España; Michael F Christman; Erynn S Gordon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Disclosing individual CDKN2A research results to melanoma survivors: interest, impact, and demands on researchers.

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; J Scott Roberts; David I Shalowitz; Jessica N Everett; Scott Y H Kim; Leon Raskin; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Brian Zikmund-Fisher; Peter Ubel; Aleksandra Jancovic; Todd Lucas; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-08-27

5.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling.

Authors:  S Lloyd; M Watson; B Waites; L Meyer; R Eeles; S Ebbs; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Development of a communication protocol for telephone disclosure of genetic test results for cancer predisposition.

Authors:  Linda J Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Dominique Fetzer; Andrea Forman; Lisa Bealin; Christina Rybak; Candace Peterson; Melanie Corbman; Julio Albarracin; Evelyn Stevens; Mary B Daly; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2014-10-29

Review 7.  Alternate Service Delivery Models in Cancer Genetic Counseling: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Adam Hudson Buchanan; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Janet L Williams
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Standards for the Reporting of Genetic Counseling Interventions in Research and Other Studies (GCIRS): an NSGC Task Force Report.

Authors:  Gillian W Hooker; D Babu; M F Myers; H Zierhut; M McAllister
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Focusing on patient needs and preferences may improve genetic counseling for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Simone Salemink; Nicky Dekker; Carolien M Kets; Erica van der Looij; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Public preferences for communicating personal genomic risk information: a focus group study.

Authors:  Amelia K Smit; Louise A Keogh; Jolyn Hersch; Ainsley J Newson; Phyllis Butow; Gabrielle Williams; Anne E Cust
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  4 in total

1.  Introduction to the "Technology in Practice" Special Issue.

Authors:  Vickie Venne; Megan Doerr
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Distress, uncertainty, and positive experiences associated with receiving information on personal genomic risk of melanoma.

Authors:  Amelia K Smit; Ainsley J Newson; Megan Best; Caro-Anne Badcock; Phyllis N Butow; Judy Kirk; Kate Dunlop; Georgina Fenton; Anne E Cust
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Barriers and Facilitators for Population Genetic Screening in Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emily C Shen; Swetha Srinivasan; Lauren E Passero; Caitlin G Allen; Madison Dixon; Kimberly Foss; Brianna Halliburton; Laura V Milko; Amelia K Smit; Rebecca Carlson; Megan C Roberts
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  Cutaneous Melanoma-A Long Road from Experimental Models to Clinical Outcome: A Review.

Authors:  Dorina Coricovac; Cristina Dehelean; Elena-Alina Moaca; Iulia Pinzaru; Tiberiu Bratu; Dan Navolan; Ovidiu Boruga
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.