Literature DB >> 24091800

Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results.

Kristi D Graves, Pamela S Sinicrope, Mary Jane Esplen, Susan K Peterson, Christi A Patten, Jan Lowery, Frank A Sinicrope, Sandra K Nigon, Joyce Borgen, Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin, Louise A Keogh, Noralane M Lindor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Few studies have examined methods to promote communication following the return of DNA mismatch repair genetic test results obtained during research. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate a telephone protocol for returning research results of DNA mismatch repair gene testing to identify Lynch syndrome.
METHODS: We invited individuals with known DNA mismatch repair mutations in their family, who were enrolled in the Colon Cancer Family Registry at the Mayo Clinic, to participate in this study. Participants completed surveys before and 6 months after DNA mismatch repair test result disclosure.
RESULTS: Among 107 participants, 79% opted to learn their DNA mismatch repair test results; of these, 44 (41%) carried DNA mismatch repair mutations. After disclosure, 54% reported screening for any type of cancer. Among carriers, >74% reported communicating results to family; communication was predicted by baseline confidence in coping with the genetic test result (Z = 1.97; P = 0.04). Result disclosure to a physician was predicted by greater perceived cancer risk (Z = 2.08; P = 0.03) and greater intention to share results with family (Z = 3.07; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: Research versus clinically based gene disclosure presents challenges. A telephone disclosure process for the return of research-based results among Lynch syndrome families led to high rates of result uptake and participant communication of results to providers and family members.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24091800      PMCID: PMC4009372          DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  32 in total

1.  Genomics in medicine: maturation, but not maturity.

Authors:  W Gregory Feero
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Communication of pharmacogenetic research results to HIV-infected treated patients: standpoints of professionals and patients.

Authors:  Grégoire Moutel; Nathalie Duchange; François Raffi; Lama I Sharara; Ioannis Théodorou; Violaine Noël; Sandrine de Montgolfier; Ingrid Callies; François Bricaire; Christian Hervé; Catherine Leport
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Returning individual research results: development of a cancer genetics education and risk communication protocol.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; David I Shalowitz; Kurt D Christensen; Jessica N Everett; Scott Y H Kim; Leon Raskin; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H J Järvinen; M Aarnio; H Mustonen; K Aktan-Collan; L A Aaltonen; P Peltomäki; A De La Chapelle; J P Mecklin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Using Alzheimer's disease as a model for genetic risk disclosure: implications for personal genomics.

Authors:  J S Roberts; K D Christensen; R C Green
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Behavioral and psychosocial responses to genomic testing for colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Rachel Nusbaum; Yasmin Salehizadeh; Gillian W Hooker; Beth N Peshkin; Morgan Butrick; William Tuong; Jeena Mathew; David Goerlitz; Mary B Fishman; Peter G Shields; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 5.736

8.  Accuracy of self-reported reason for colorectal cancer testing.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Sally W Vernon; Arica White; Peter N Abotchie; Sharon P Coan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Validation of single-item linear analog scale assessment of quality of life in neuro-oncology patients.

Authors:  Dona E C Locke; Paul A Decker; Jeff A Sloan; Paul D Brown; James F Malec; Matthew M Clark; Teresa A Rummans; Karla V Ballman; Paul L Schaefer; Jan C Buckner
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Knowledge about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer; mutation carriers and physicians at equal levels.

Authors:  Katarina Domanska; Christina Carlsson; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.103

View more
  17 in total

1.  Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Rebecca Branum; Barbara A Koenig; Gloria M Petersen; Susan A Berry; Laura M Beskow; Mary B Daly; Conrad V Fernandez; Robert C Green; Bonnie S LeRoy; Noralane M Lindor; P Pearl O'Rourke; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Mark A Rothstein; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Much ado about nothing: A qualitative study of the experiences of an average-risk population receiving results of exome sequencing.

Authors:  Shannon Rego; Orit Dagan-Rosenfeld; Stephanie A Bivona; Michael P Snyder; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Cohort Profile: The Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort (CCFRC).

Authors:  Mark A Jenkins; Aung Ko Win; Allyson S Templeton; Maggie S Angelakos; Daniel D Buchanan; Michelle Cotterchio; Jane C Figueiredo; Stephen N Thibodeau; John A Baron; John D Potter; John L Hopper; Graham Casey; Steven Gallinger; Loic Le Marchand; Noralane M Lindor; Polly A Newcomb; Robert W Haile
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  The big reveal: Family disclosure patterns of BRCA genetic test results among young Black women with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Claire C Conley; Dana Ketcher; Maija Reblin; Monica L Kasting; Deborah Cragun; Jongphil Kim; Kimlin Tam Ashing; Cheryl L Knott; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Exploring relatives' perceptions of participation, ethics, and communication in a patient-driven study for hereditary cancer variant reclassification.

Authors:  Ginger J Tsai; Annie T Chen; Lauren T Garrett; Wylie Burke; Deborah J Bowen; Brian H Shirts
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Prevalence and correlates of receiving and sharing high-penetrance cancer genetic test results: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Christine Q Chang; Tram K Lam; Elizabeth M Gillanders; Jada G Hamilton; Sheri D Schully
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Prior opioid exposure influences parents' sharing of their children's CYP2D6 research results.

Authors:  Melanie F Myers; Xue Zhang; Brooke McLaughlin; Diane Kissell; Cassandra L Perry; Matthew Veerkamp; Kejian Zhang; Ingrid A Holm; Cynthia A Prows
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.533

8.  Patient communication of cancer genetic test results in a diverse population.

Authors:  Charité N Ricker; Rachel B Koff; Chenxu Qu; Julie Culver; Duveen Sturgeon; Kerry E Kingham; Katrina Lowstuter; Nicolette M Chun; Courtney Rowe-Teeter; Alexandra Lebensohn; Peter Levonian; Katlyn Partynski; Karlena Lara-Otero; Christine Hong; Iva M Petrovchich; Meredith A Mills; Anne-Renee Hartman; Brian Allen; Uri Ladabaum; Kevin McDonnell; James M Ford; Stephen B Gruber; Allison W Kurian; Gregory E Idos
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Pragmatic Tools for Sharing Genomic Research Results with the Relatives of Living and Deceased Research Participants.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Emily Scholtes; Barbara A Koenig; Gloria M Petersen; Susan A Berry; Laura M Beskow; Mary B Daly; Conrad V Fernandez; Robert C Green; Bonnie S LeRoy; Noralane M Lindor; P Pearl O'Rourke; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Mark A Rothstein; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.718

10.  Returning Individual Genetic Research Results to Research Participants: Uptake and Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Kara N Maxwell; Laura DiGiovanni; Jamie Brower; Dominique Fetzer; Jill Bennett Gaieski; Amanda Brandt; Danielle McKenna; Jessica Long; Jacquelyn Powers; Jill E Stopfer; Katherine L Nathanson; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.