Literature DB >> 23576114

Independence is elusive: set size effects on encoding precision in visual search.

Helga Mazyar1, Ronald van den Berg, Robert L Seilheimer, Wei Ji Ma.   

Abstract

Looking for a target in a visual scene becomes more difficult as the number of stimuli increases. In a signal detection theory view, this is due to the cumulative effect of noise in the encoding of the distractors, and potentially on top of that, to an increase of the noise (i.e., a decrease of precision) per stimulus with set size, reflecting divided attention. It has long been argued that human visual search behavior can be accounted for by the first factor alone. While such an account seems to be adequate for search tasks in which all distractors have the same, known feature value (i.e., are maximally predictable), we recently found a clear effect of set size on encoding precision when distractors are drawn from a uniform distribution (i.e., when they are maximally unpredictable). Here we interpolate between these two extreme cases to examine which of both conclusions holds more generally as distractor statistics are varied. In one experiment, we vary the level of distractor heterogeneity; in another we dissociate distractor homogeneity from predictability. In all conditions in both experiments, we found a strong decrease of precision with increasing set size, suggesting that precision being independent of set size is the exception rather than the rule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23576114      PMCID: PMC3629901          DOI: 10.1167/13.5.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  18 in total

Review 1.  Visual search and attention: a signal detection theory approach.

Authors:  P Verghese
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-08-30       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task.

Authors:  Tom Busey; John Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Color in visual search.

Authors:  M D'Zmura
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Optimal feature integration in visual search.

Authors:  Benjamin T Vincent; Roland J Baddeley; Tom Troscianko; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors.

Authors:  B Bauer; P Jolicoeur; W B Cowan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; C T Ames; D T Lindsey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Behavior and neural basis of near-optimal visual search.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Vidhya Navalpakkam; Jeffrey M Beck; Ronald van den Berg; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Visual search for orientation among heterogeneous distractors: experimental results and implications for signal-detection theory models of search.

Authors:  R Rosenholtz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  8 in total

1.  A computational perspective on autism.

Authors:  Ari Rosenberg; Jaclyn Sky Patterson; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Variable precision in visual perception.

Authors:  Shan Shen; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Requiem for the max rule?

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Shan Shen; Gintare Dziugaite; Ronald van den Berg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Visual Decisions in the Presence of Measurement and Stimulus Correlations.

Authors:  Manisha Bhardwaj; Samuel Carroll; Wei Ji Ma; Krešimir Josić
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  A detailed comparison of optimality and simplicity in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Shan Shen; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Do People Take Stimulus Correlations into Account in Visual Search?

Authors:  Manisha Bhardwaj; Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma; Krešimir Josić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Models and processes of multisensory cue combination.

Authors:  Robert L Seilheimer; Ari Rosenberg; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Explaining the effects of distractor statistics in visual search.

Authors:  Joshua Calder-Travis; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.