Literature DB >> 11518158

Visual search for orientation among heterogeneous distractors: experimental results and implications for signal-detection theory models of search.

R Rosenholtz1.   

Abstract

Three experiments tested a signal-detection theory (SDT) model of visual search (e.g., as described in J. Palmer, C. T. Ames, & D. T. Lindsey, 1993). In Experiment 1, participants searched for a 0 degrees line among distractors at (a) 30 degrees; (b) 1/3 at 30 degrees, 2/3 at 50 degrees; (c) 1/3 at 30 degrees, 50 degrees, and 70 degrees; and (d) 1/3 at 30 degrees, 2/3 at 70 degrees. The SDT model predicts improved performance in the more heterogeneous conditions, as some distractors are more discriminable from the target. In contrast, in Experiment 1 human performance degraded in the more heterogeneous conditions (c and d). In Experiment 2, sparser displays improved the performance of the SDT model. In Experiment 3, search for theta degrees among homogeneous theta + 20 degrees distractors was compared with search for theta degrees among theta+/-20 degrees distractors. Performance in the latter condition was often worse, relative to performance in the homogeneous condition, than predicted by the SDT model; however, this depended greatly on the identity of the target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11518158     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.4.985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  19 in total

1.  Does precision decrease with set size?

Authors:  Helga Mazyar; Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Independence is elusive: set size effects on encoding precision in visual search.

Authors:  Helga Mazyar; Ronald van den Berg; Robert L Seilheimer; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Requiem for the max rule?

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Shan Shen; Gintare Dziugaite; Ronald van den Berg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  An explicit investigation of the roles that feature distributions play in rapid visual categorization.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Natalia A Tiurina; Igor S Utochkin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Visual Decisions in the Presence of Measurement and Stimulus Correlations.

Authors:  Manisha Bhardwaj; Samuel Carroll; Wei Ji Ma; Krešimir Josić
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Behavior and neural basis of near-optimal visual search.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Vidhya Navalpakkam; Jeffrey M Beck; Ronald van den Berg; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Do People Take Stimulus Correlations into Account in Visual Search?

Authors:  Manisha Bhardwaj; Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma; Krešimir Josić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search.

Authors:  Ruth Rosenholtz; Jie Huang; Alvin Raj; Benjamin J Balas; Livia Ilie
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Classic Visual Search Effects in an Additional Singleton Task: An Open Dataset.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Titiksha Patel; Nicole Rangan; John T Serences
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2021-07-28

10.  The influence of category representativeness on the low prevalence effect in visual search.

Authors:  Ryan E O'Donnell; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.