Literature DB >> 26963498

Do People Take Stimulus Correlations into Account in Visual Search?

Manisha Bhardwaj1, Ronald van den Berg2,3, Wei Ji Ma2,4, Krešimir Josić1,5.   

Abstract

In laboratory visual search experiments, distractors are often statistically independent of each other. However, stimuli in more naturalistic settings are often correlated and rarely independent. Here, we examine whether human observers take stimulus correlations into account in orientation target detection. We find that they do, although probably not optimally. In particular, it seems that low distractor correlations are overestimated. Our results might contribute to bridging the gap between artificial and natural visual search tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26963498      PMCID: PMC4786311          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  25 in total

1.  The psychophysics of visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; P Verghese; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Visual search and attention: a signal detection theory approach.

Authors:  P Verghese
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-08-30       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task.

Authors:  Tom Busey; John Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Requiem for the max rule?

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Shan Shen; Gintare Dziugaite; Ronald van den Berg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Exact feature probabilities in images with occlusion.

Authors:  Xaq Pitkow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Visual search for orientation among heterogeneous distractors: experimental results and implications for signal-detection theory models of search.

Authors:  R Rosenholtz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Alterations in choice behavior by manipulations of world model.

Authors:  C S Green; C Benson; D Kersten; P Schrater
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Contour statistics in natural images: grouping across occlusions.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler; Jeffrey S Perry
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Visual clutter causes high-magnitude errors.

Authors:  Stefano Baldassi; Nicola Megna; David C Burr
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  3 in total

1.  Variable precision in visual perception.

Authors:  Shan Shen; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Visual Decisions in the Presence of Measurement and Stimulus Correlations.

Authors:  Manisha Bhardwaj; Samuel Carroll; Wei Ji Ma; Krešimir Josić
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Explaining the effects of distractor statistics in visual search.

Authors:  Joshua Calder-Travis; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.