Literature DB >> 8440980

Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search.

J Palmer1, C T Ames, D T Lindsey.   

Abstract

Set-size in visual search may be due to 1 or more of 3 factors: sensory processes such as lateral masking between stimuli, attentional processes limiting the perception of individual stimuli, or attentional processes affecting the decision rules for combining information from multiple stimuli. These possibilities were evaluated in tasks such as searching for a longer line among shorter lines. To evaluate sensory contributions, display set-size effects were compared with cuing conditions that held sensory phenomena constant. Similar effects for the display and cue manipulations suggested that sensory processes contributed little under the conditions of this experiment. To evaluate the contribution of decision processes, the set-size effects were modeled with signal detection theory. In these models, a decision effect alone was sufficient to predict the set-size effects without any attentional limitation due to perception.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8440980     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.1.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  73 in total

1.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  B McElree; M Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  S P Gandhi; D J Heeger; G M Boynton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Detecting changes between real-world objects using spatiochromatic filters.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

4.  Measuring the effect of multiple eye fixations on memory for visual attributes.

Authors:  J Palmer; C T Ames
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-09

5.  Unimodal and crossmodal effects of endogenous attention to visual and auditory motion.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Valentin Wyart; Anna Christina Nobre; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Does precision decrease with set size?

Authors:  Helga Mazyar; Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.

Authors:  Rani Moran; Michael Zehetleitner; Heinrich René Liesefeld; Hermann J Müller; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

9.  Attention searches nonuniformly in space and in time.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Douglas McLelland; Mathilde Lajous; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  How important is lateral masking in visual search?

Authors:  A H Wertheim; I T C Hooge; K Krikke; A Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.