Literature DB >> 23574419

Pregnancy recruitment for population research: the National Children's Study vanguard experience in Wayne County, Michigan.

Jean M Kerver1, Michael R Elliott, Gwendolyn S Norman, Robert J Sokol, Daniel P Keating, Glenn E Copeland, Christine C Johnson, Kendall K Cislo, Kirsten H Alcser, Shonda R Kruger-Ndiaye, Beth-Ellen Pennell, Shobha Mehta, Christine L M Joseph, Nigel Paneth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To obtain a probability sample of pregnancies, the National Children's Study conducted door-to-door recruitment in randomly selected neighbourhoods in randomly selected counties in 2009-10. In 2011, an experiment was conducted in 10 US counties, in which the two-stage geographic sample was maintained, but participants were recruited in prenatal care provider offices. We describe our experience recruiting pregnant women this way in Wayne County, Michigan, a county where geographically eligible women attended 147 prenatal care settings, and comprised just 2% of total county pregnancies.
METHODS: After screening for address eligibility in prenatal care offices, we used a three-part recruitment process: (1) providers obtained permission for us to contact eligible patients, (2) clinical research staff described the study to women in clinical settings, and (3) survey research staff visited the home to consent and interview eligible women.
RESULTS: We screened 34,065 addresses in 67 provider settings to find 215 eligible women. Providers obtained permission for research contact from 81.4% of eligible women, of whom 92.5% agreed to a home visit. All home-visited women consented, giving a net enrolment of 75%. From birth certificates, we estimate that 30% of eligible county pregnancies were enrolled, reaching 40-50% in the final recruitment months.
CONCLUSIONS: We recruited a high fraction of pregnancies identified in a broad cross-section of provider offices. Nonetheless, because of time and resource constraints, we could enrol only a fraction of geographically eligible pregnancies. Our experience suggests that the probability sampling of pregnancies for research could be more efficiently achieved through sampling of providers rather than households.
© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23574419      PMCID: PMC3673293          DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  8 in total

1.  Attitudes of pregnant women towards collection of biological specimens during pregnancy and at birth.

Authors:  Sarah Nechuta; Lanay M Mudd; Michael R Elliott; James M Lepkowski; Nigel Paneth
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Statistical and practical issues in the design of a national probability sample of births for the Vanguard Study of the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Jill M Montaquila; J Michael Brick; Lester R Curtin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A simple method to generate equal-sized homogenous strata or clusters for population-based sampling.

Authors:  Michael R Elliott
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  National Children's Study: update in 2010.

Authors:  Steven Hirschfeld; David Songco; Barnett S Kramer; Alan E Guttmacher
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

5.  Prenatal care and delivery room staff attitudes toward research and the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Lanay M Mudd; Xinh Pham; Sarah Nechuta; Michael R Elliott; James M Lepkowski; Nigel Paneth
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-07-31

6.  Implementing provider-based sampling for the National Children's Study: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Kathleen Belanger; Stephen Buka; Debra C Cherry; Donald J Dudley; Michael R Elliott; Daniel E Hale; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Jessica L Illuzzi; Nigel Paneth; James M Robbins; Elizabeth W Triche; Michael B Bracken
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.980

7.  Attitudes of pregnant women towards participation in perinatal epidemiological research.

Authors:  Sarah Nechuta; Lanay M Mudd; Lynette Biery; Michael R Elliott; James M Lepkowski; Nigel Paneth
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.980

8.  New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?

Authors:  Teri A Manolio; Brenda K Weis; Catherine C Cowie; Robert N Hoover; Kathy Hudson; Barnett S Kramer; Chris Berg; Rory Collins; Wendy Ewart; J Michael Gaziano; Steven Hirschfeld; Pamela M Marcus; Daniel Masys; Catherine A McCarty; John McLaughlin; Alpa V Patel; Tim Peakman; Nancy L Pedersen; Catherine Schaefer; Joan A Scott; Timothy Sprosen; Mark Walport; Francis S Collins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 4.897

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Recruitment and retention of pregnant women into clinical research trials: an overview of challenges, facilitators, and best practices.

Authors:  Paula M Frew; Diane S Saint-Victor; Margaret Brewinski Isaacs; Sonnie Kim; Geeta K Swamy; Jeanne S Sheffield; Kathryn M Edwards; Tonya Villafana; Ouda Kamagate; Kevin Ault
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  The National Children's Study: Recruitment Outcomes Using the Provider-Based Recruitment Approach.

Authors:  Daniel E Hale; Sharon B Wyatt; Stephen Buka; Debra Cherry; Kendall K Cislo; Donald J Dudley; Pearl Anna McElfish; Gwendolyn S Norman; Simone A Reynolds; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Sandra Wadlinger; Cheryl K Walker; James M Robbins
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  The National Children's Study: Early Recruitment Outcomes Using the Direct Outreach Approach.

Authors:  Patricia M McGovern; Nancy M Nachreiner; Jane L Holl; Neal Halfon; Dana Dabelea; Laura Caulfield; Jane A Cauley; Mark S Innocenti; Laura Amsden; Nina Markovic; Minsun Riddles; Sara Adams
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Characteristics of Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Cohorts Recruited During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Elissa Z Faro; Katherine A Sauder; Amber L Anderson; Anne L Dunlop; Jean M Kerver; Monica McGrath; Mary Roary; Carolyn W Roman; Cara Weidinger; Kathi C Huddleston
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug 01       Impact factor: 1.753

5.  Impact of preconception enrollment on birth enrollment and timing of exposure assessment in the initial vanguard cohort of the U.S. National Children's Study.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Ruth Brenner; David Fetterer; Leslie Palmer; Kenneth C Schoendorf
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Engaging pregnant women in observational research: a qualitative exploratory study.

Authors:  Evelyne Muggli; Helen Curd; Cate Nagle; Della Forster; Jane Halliday
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Lessons from Prenatal Care Provider-Based Recruitment into the National Children's Study.

Authors:  James M Robbins; Melissa D Bridges; Elizabeth M Childers; Roseanne M Harris; Pearl A McElfish
Journal:  Pediatr Rep       Date:  2015-09-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.