Literature DB >> 19689493

Attitudes of pregnant women towards participation in perinatal epidemiological research.

Sarah Nechuta1, Lanay M Mudd, Lynette Biery, Michael R Elliott, James M Lepkowski, Nigel Paneth.   

Abstract

We assessed attitudes of a multi-ethnic sample of pregnant women in regard to participation in five data collection procedures planned for use in the National Children's Study. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in nine prenatal clinics in Kent County, Michigan between April and October 2006. Women were approached in clinic waiting rooms at the time of their first prenatal visit and 311 (91.0%) participated. Women were asked about their willingness to participate, and the smallest amount of compensation required for participation in a 45-min in-person interview, a 15-min telephone interview, maternal and infant medical record abstraction, and an infant physical examination. Percentages for willingness to participate were highest for telephone interview (83%), followed by in-person interview (60%), infant examination (57%), and maternal (56%) and infant medical records (54%). About 34-48% of women reported that no compensation would be required for participation by data procedure. Some women reported unwillingness to participate in telephone (9%) or personal (17%) interview, record abstraction (34%) or infant examination (26%), even with compensation. Education greater than high school was associated with increased odds of refusal for infant physical examination, adjusted odds ratio 2.44 [95% confidence interval 1.41, 4.23]. In conclusion, 9-34% of pregnant women, depending on procedure, stated they would not participate in non-invasive research procedures such as medical record abstraction and infant examination, even with compensation. Resistance to these research procedures was especially noted among more highly educated women. Planning for the National Children's Study will have to address potential resistance to research among pregnant women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19689493     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01058.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  11 in total

1.  Participation of Ghanaian pregnant women in an antimalarial drug trial: willingness, experiences and perceptions.

Authors:  Joseph Osarfo; Rose O Adjei; Pascal Magnussen; Harry K Tagbor
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.184

2.  Early experiences and predictors of recruitment success for the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Leonardo Trasande; Howard F Andrews; Christopher Goranson; Wenhui Li; Elise C Barrow; Suzette B Vanderbeek; Brittany McCrary; Suzannah B Allen; Kathleen D Gallagher; Andrew Rundle; James Quinn; Barbara Brenner
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Exploring patients' reasons for declining contact in a cognitive behavioural therapy randomised controlled trial in primary care.

Authors:  Maria Barnes; Nicola Wiles; Jill Morrison; David Kessler; Chris Williams; Willem Kuyken; Glyn Lewis; Katrina Turner
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Special population considerations and regulatory affairs for clinical research.

Authors:  Kristin N Grimsrud; Catherine M T Sherwin; Jonathan E Constance; Casey Tak; Athena F Zuppa; Michael G Spigarelli; Nicole L Mihalopoulos
Journal:  Clin Res Regul Aff       Date:  2015

5.  Pregnancy recruitment for population research: the National Children's Study vanguard experience in Wayne County, Michigan.

Authors:  Jean M Kerver; Michael R Elliott; Gwendolyn S Norman; Robert J Sokol; Daniel P Keating; Glenn E Copeland; Christine C Johnson; Kendall K Cislo; Kirsten H Alcser; Shonda R Kruger-Ndiaye; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Shobha Mehta; Christine L M Joseph; Nigel Paneth
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  Willingness to Participate in Research during Pregnancy: Race, Experience, and Motivation.

Authors:  Heather H Gatny; William G Axinn
Journal:  Field methods       Date:  2011-10-09

7.  Participation of people living in rural areas of Eskisehir province in field researches, and factors affecting their rates of participation.

Authors:  Ozkan Ozay; Emine Ayhan; Muhammed Fatih Onsuz; Burhanettin Isikli; Selma Metintas
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2015-04-24

8.  "Telling" and assent: Parents' attitudes towards children's participation in a birth cohort study.

Authors:  Izen Ri; Eiko Suda; Zentaro Yamagata; Hiroshi Nitta; Kaori Muto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Why do pregnant women participate in research? A patient participation investigation using Q-Methodology.

Authors:  Riwa Meshaka; Stephen Jeffares; Farah Sadrudin; Nicole Huisman; Ponnusamy Saravanan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Attitudes to participating in a birth cohort study, views from a multiethnic population: a qualitative study using focus groups.

Authors:  Neeru Garg; Thomas P Round; Gavin Daker-White; Peter Bower; Chris J Griffiths
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.