Literature DB >> 18668359

Prenatal care and delivery room staff attitudes toward research and the National Children's Study.

Lanay M Mudd1, Xinh Pham, Sarah Nechuta, Michael R Elliott, James M Lepkowski, Nigel Paneth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The cooperation of healthcare personnel is essential for implementing clinical research, yet little is known about the willingness of staff to facilitate research. This study assessed attitudes of prenatal clinic and delivery room (DR) staff toward facilitation of research, with a particular focus on the National Children's Study (NCS).
METHODS: Staff from seven sampled prenatal clinics (N=82) and all three DRs in Kent County, MI (N=169) completed anonymous surveys assessing willingness to recruit patients (clinic) or collect biological specimens (DR), desired incentives, and barriers to research in general and the NCS specifically.
RESULTS: Clinic staff included 36 office workers, 29 nurses, 11 medical assistants and 6 physicians/physician assistants. DR staff included 127 nurses, 19 support staff, 11 physicians and 10 technicians. Clinic staff would hand out brochures (72%) and describe studies (65%), but only 44% wanted outside research staff to recruit patients. Non-White staff were 4.1 times more likely (95% CI. 1.2-14.1) to permit outside staff to recruit. DR staff would collect placentas (84%) and cord blood (77%), and preferred DR staff to perform the collections. In both settings, financial incentives were not required or were modest. Lack of time was the most reported research barrier, followed by patient flow and lack of space. A small fraction of healthcare workers reported refusal to facilitate research tasks.
CONCLUSIONS: Careful planning of research with all clinic and DR staff will be necessary for successful execution of the NCS or other large-scale clinical research studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18668359     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-008-0393-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  15 in total

1.  What are the attitudes of general practitioners towards research?

Authors:  G Robinson; M Gould
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  General practice research: attitudes and involvement of Queensland general practitioners.

Authors:  Deborah A Askew; Alexandra M Clavarino; Paul P Glasziou; Christopher B Del Mar
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Making the National Children's Study a real partnership with academic pediatrics.

Authors:  William D Lyman; Charles Barone; Valerie Castle; H Dele Davies; Bonita Stanton; Nigel Paneth
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Nurses' attitudes toward nursing research at a metropolitan medical center.

Authors:  Meg Smirnoff; Marjorie Ramirez; Linda Kooplimae; Michael Gibney; Mary Dee McEvoy
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.257

5.  Participation and successful patient recruitment in primary care.

Authors:  N J de Wit; A O Quartero; A P Zuithoff; M E Numans
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Factors affecting the level of interest and activity in primary care research among general practitioners.

Authors:  C A Silagy; N E Carson
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  Factors affecting general practitioner involvement in a randomised controlled trial in primary care.

Authors:  Ann Richardson; Margaret Sutherland; Elisabeth Wells; Les Toop; Libby Plumridge
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2002-04-12

8.  The National Children's Study: a 21-year prospective study of 100,000 American children.

Authors:  Philip J Landrigan; Leonardo Trasande; Lorna E Thorpe; Charon Gwynn; Paul J Lioy; Mary E D'Alton; Heather S Lipkind; James Swanson; Pathik D Wadhwa; Edward B Clark; Virginia A Rauh; Frederica P Perera; Ezra Susser
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Factors that influence doctors' participation in clinical research.

Authors:  Tom Lloyd; Brenda R Phillips; Robert C Aber
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Practice-based research: opportunities and obstacles.

Authors:  K K Christoffel; H J Binns; J A Stockman; P McGuire; J Poncher; S Unti; B Typlin; G Lasin; W Seigel
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  4 in total

1.  Educating Parents About Pediatric Research: Children and Clinical Studies Website Qualitative Evaluation.

Authors:  Lisa D Marceau; Lisa C Welch; Victoria L Pemberton; Gail D Pearson
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-12-28

2.  Children and clinical studies: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's new multimedia resource for pediatric research.

Authors:  Victoria L Pemberton; Jonathan R Kaltman; Gail D Pearson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Pregnancy recruitment for population research: the National Children's Study vanguard experience in Wayne County, Michigan.

Authors:  Jean M Kerver; Michael R Elliott; Gwendolyn S Norman; Robert J Sokol; Daniel P Keating; Glenn E Copeland; Christine C Johnson; Kendall K Cislo; Kirsten H Alcser; Shonda R Kruger-Ndiaye; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Shobha Mehta; Christine L M Joseph; Nigel Paneth
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Nurses' Attitudes Toward Clinical Research: Experience of the Therapeutic Hypothermia After Pediatric Cardiac Arrest Trials.

Authors:  Brittan Browning; Kent E Page; Renee L Kuhn; Mary Ann DiLiberto; Jendar Deschenes; Eileen Taillie; Elyse Tomanio; Richard Holubkov; J Michael Dean; Frank W Moler; Kathleen Meert; Victoria L Pemberton
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.624

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.