Literature DB >> 22471686

Attitudes of pregnant women towards collection of biological specimens during pregnancy and at birth.

Sarah Nechuta1, Lanay M Mudd, Michael R Elliott, James M Lepkowski, Nigel Paneth.   

Abstract

Epidemiological investigations of maternal and child health may involve the collection of biological specimens, including cord blood and the placenta; however, the attitudes of pregnant women towards participation in the collection of biological specimens have been studied rarely. We evaluated attitudes towards collection and storage of biological specimens, and determined whether attitudes differed by maternal characteristics, in a cross-sectional study of pregnant women residing in Kent County, Michigan. Women were interviewed at their first visit for prenatal care between April and October 2006 (n = 311). Willingness to participate was highest for maternal blood collection (72%), followed by storage of biological specimens (68%), placenta collection (64%), and cord blood collection (63%). About one-quarter of women (25-28% by procedure) would not participate even if compensated. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with unwillingness to participate in maternal blood collection (OR = 2.16 [95% CI 1.15, 4.04]). Primiparity was associated with unwillingness to participate in cord blood collection (OR = 1.72 [95% CI 1.23, 2.42]). Among women willing to participate, Hispanic women were less likely to require compensation; while higher educated, married and primiparous women were more likely to require compensation. In conclusion, while many pregnant women were willing to participate in biological specimen collection, some women were more resistant, in particular Hispanic and primiparous women. Targeting these groups of women for enhanced recruitment efforts may improve overall participation rates and the representativeness of participants in future studies of maternal and child health.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22471686     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01265.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  7 in total

1.  Willingness of women to participate in obstetrical and pediatric research involving biobanks.

Authors:  Renate D Savich; Beth B Tigges; Lisbeth Iglesias Rios; Joanne McCloskey; Kristine Tollestrup; Robert D Annett
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-11-28

2.  Survey of motivation to participate in a birth cohort.

Authors:  Midori Yamamoto; Misuzu Fujita; Chisato Mori; Akira Hata
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Pregnancy recruitment for population research: the National Children's Study vanguard experience in Wayne County, Michigan.

Authors:  Jean M Kerver; Michael R Elliott; Gwendolyn S Norman; Robert J Sokol; Daniel P Keating; Glenn E Copeland; Christine C Johnson; Kendall K Cislo; Kirsten H Alcser; Shonda R Kruger-Ndiaye; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Shobha Mehta; Christine L M Joseph; Nigel Paneth
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  "Telling" and assent: Parents' attitudes towards children's participation in a birth cohort study.

Authors:  Izen Ri; Eiko Suda; Zentaro Yamagata; Hiroshi Nitta; Kaori Muto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Engaging pregnant women in observational research: a qualitative exploratory study.

Authors:  Evelyne Muggli; Helen Curd; Cate Nagle; Della Forster; Jane Halliday
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The Food, Feelings, and Family Study: comparison of the efficacy of traditional methods, social media, and broadcast email to recruit pregnant women to an observational, longitudinal nutrition study.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith; Crystal Alvarez; Sylvia Crixell; Michelle A Lane
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Attitudes to participating in a birth cohort study, views from a multiethnic population: a qualitative study using focus groups.

Authors:  Neeru Garg; Thomas P Round; Gavin Daker-White; Peter Bower; Chris J Griffiths
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.