Literature DB >> 27251869

The National Children's Study: Early Recruitment Outcomes Using the Direct Outreach Approach.

Patricia M McGovern1, Nancy M Nachreiner2, Jane L Holl3, Neal Halfon4, Dana Dabelea5, Laura Caulfield6, Jane A Cauley7, Mark S Innocenti8, Laura Amsden3, Nina Markovic7, Minsun Riddles9, Sara Adams9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 2009, the National Children's Study (NCS) Vanguard Study tested the feasibility of household-based recruitment and participant enrollment by using a birth rate probability sample. In 2010, the NCS Program Office launched 3 alternative recruitment methods. We tested whether direct outreach (DO) recruitment could be a more efficient strategy to recruit women of child-bearing age.
METHODS: The NCS DO recruitment approach recruited women, 18 to 49 years, who were pregnant or trying to conceive using passive recruitment methods emphasizing broad community outreach and engagement to create study awareness. Study mailings to listed households included a pregnancy screening questionnaire to identify potentially eligible women from selected neighborhoods to contact the study center. Unique features of this recruitment approach included the following: (1) expansion of selected neighborhoods to maximize potential participant recruitment and enrollment while minimizing in-person participant contact and (2) offering 2 levels of study participation distinguished by data collection intensity.
RESULTS: Ten study centers listed 255 475 geographically eligible households for contact representing, on average, 3.3% of households per Primary Sampling Unit. A total of 19 354 women were identified for screening, and 17 421 completed a pregnancy screener representing 6.8% of eligible households. Study-eligible pregnant women were older, more educated, and less likely to be Hispanic than the general population. Only 16% (2786) of 17 421 screened women were study-eligible, and 81.1% of these 2786 women consented to participate.
CONCLUSIONS: Although feasible, the DO approach recruited a sample of study-eligible pregnant women significantly different from the population. This recruitment approach was labor intensive for the yield of enrolled women.
Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27251869      PMCID: PMC4878107          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-4410D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  9 in total

1.  Cohort profile: the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa).

Authors:  Per Magnus; Lorentz M Irgens; Kjell Haug; Wenche Nystad; Rolv Skjaerven; Camilla Stoltenberg
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Enrollment and response rates in a longitudinal birth cohort.

Authors:  Jean Golding; Karen Birmingham
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.980

3.  Statistical and practical issues in the design of a national probability sample of births for the Vanguard Study of the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Jill M Montaquila; J Michael Brick; Lester R Curtin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Early experiences and predictors of recruitment success for the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Leonardo Trasande; Howard F Andrews; Christopher Goranson; Wenhui Li; Elise C Barrow; Suzette B Vanderbeek; Brittany McCrary; Suzannah B Allen; Kathleen D Gallagher; Andrew Rundle; James Quinn; Barbara Brenner
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Recruitment of healthy first-trimester pregnant women: lessons from the Chemicals, Health & Pregnancy study (CHirP).

Authors:  Glenys M Webster; Kay Teschke; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

6.  The Danish National Birth Cohort--its background, structure and aim.

Authors:  J Olsen; M Melbye; S F Olsen; T I Sørensen; P Aaby; A M Andersen; D Taxbøl; K D Hansen; M Juhl; T B Schow; H T Sørensen; J Andresen; E L Mortensen; A W Olesen; C Søndergaard
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Participant recruitment to a randomized trial of a community-based behavioral intervention for pre- and interconceptional women findings from the Central Pennsylvania Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Diana L Velott; Sara A Baker; Marianne M Hillemeier; Carol S Weisman
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2008 May-Jun

8.  The Experience of Direct Outreach Recruitment in the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Jill L Kaar; Nina Markovic; Laura B Amsden; Janice Gilliland; Charles F Shorter; Bonika Peters; Nancy M Nachreiner; Mischka Garel; Will Nicholas; Bradley Skarpness; Carolyn Drews-Botsch; Carol J Hogue; Dana Dabelea
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Pregnancy recruitment for population research: the National Children's Study vanguard experience in Wayne County, Michigan.

Authors:  Jean M Kerver; Michael R Elliott; Gwendolyn S Norman; Robert J Sokol; Daniel P Keating; Glenn E Copeland; Christine C Johnson; Kendall K Cislo; Kirsten H Alcser; Shonda R Kruger-Ndiaye; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Shobha Mehta; Christine L M Joseph; Nigel Paneth
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.980

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Trends in incidence and outcomes of gastroschisis in the United States: analysis of the national inpatient sample 2010-2014.

Authors:  Parth Bhatt; Anusha Lekshminarayanan; Keyur Donda; Fredrick Dapaah-Siakwan; Badal Thakkar; Sumesh Parat; Shilpi Chabra; Zeenia Billimoria
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Comparison of Recruitment Strategy Outcomes in the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Christina H Park; Marianne Winglee; Jennifer Kwan; Linda Andrews; Mark L Hudak
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  The National Children's Study: Recruitment Outcomes Using an Enhanced Household-Based Approach.

Authors:  Laura L Blaisdell; Jennifer A Zellner; Alison A King; Elaine Faustman; Mari Wilhelm; Mark L Hudak; Robert D Annett
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Multilevel Provider-Based Sampling for Recruitment of Pregnant Women and Mother-Newborn Dyads.

Authors:  Thomas J McLaughlin; Onesky Aupont; Claudia A Kozinetz; David Hubble; Tiffany A Moore-Simas; Deborah Davis; Christina Park; Ruth Brenner; Deidre Sepavich; Marianne Felice; Chantal Caviness; Tim Downs; Beatrice J Selwyn; Michele R Forman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Effectiveness of community outreach and engagement in recruitment success for a prebirth cohort.

Authors:  Beth B Tigges; Jill L Kaar; Nancy Erbstein; Pamela Silberman; Kate Winseck; Maria Lopez-Class; Thomas M Burbacher
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-07-19

6.  Linking Postpartum and Parenting Women With a National Diabetes Prevention Program: Recruitment Efforts, Challenges, and Recommendations.

Authors:  Maria L Gómez; Laura B Hieronymus; Kristin B Ashford; Janine M Barnett; Theresa A Renn
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2018-11

7.  The National Children's Study Archive Model: A 3-Tier Framework for Dissemination of Data and Specimens for General Use and Secondary Analysis.

Authors:  Peter K Gilbertson; Susan Forrester; Linda Andrews; Kathleen McCann; Lydia Rogers; Christina Park; Jack Moye
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-03-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.