Literature DB >> 21259268

National Children's Study: update in 2010.

Steven Hirschfeld1, David Songco, Barnett S Kramer, Alan E Guttmacher.   

Abstract

The National Children's Study will examine the effects of the environment and genetics on the growth, development, and health of children across the United States; it will follow participants from before birth until age 21 years. The goal of the study is to improve the health and well-being of children and contribute to understanding the roles various factors play in health and disease. Findings from the study will be made available as the research progresses, making potential benefits known to the public as soon as possible. A robust pilot study, or Vanguard Study, is underway to generate data for designing the subsequent Main Study. The goals of the Vanguard Study are feasibility, acceptability, and cost, and the goals of the Main Study will be exposure-response relationships and biological, environmental, and genetic interactions. The initial Vanguard Study experience among 7 study centers was successful in many ways, including delineating the topics to explore for the next phase of the Vanguard Study. Three different recruitment strategies are under evaluation to determine what approach to use for the Main Study. The organization of National Children's Study operations is currently based on a new decentralized business model.
© 2011 Mount Sinai School of Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21259268      PMCID: PMC3247064          DOI: 10.1002/msj.20227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med        ISSN: 0027-2507


  3 in total

1.  The UK Biobank sample handling and storage validation studies.

Authors:  Tim C Peakman; Paul Elliott
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Statistical and practical issues in the design of a national probability sample of births for the Vanguard Study of the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Jill M Montaquila; J Michael Brick; Lester R Curtin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Exploring the acceptability and feasibility of conducting a large longitudinal population-based study in Canada.

Authors:  Susan A Kirkland; Parminder S Raina; Christina Wolfson; Geoff Strople; Olga Kits; Steven Dukeshire; Camille L Angus; Karen Szala-Meneok; Jennifer Uniat; Homa Keshavarz; Linda Furlini; Amélie Pelletier
Journal:  Can J Aging       Date:  2009-09
  3 in total
  13 in total

1.  The National Children's Study in North Carolina: a study of the effect of the environment on children's health, growth, and development.

Authors:  Emmanuel B Walter; Nancy Dole; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Barbara Entwisle
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr

Review 2.  The National Children's Study: an opportunity for medical toxicology.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Mortensen; Steven Hirschfeld
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2012-06

3.  Recruitment of women in the National Children's Study Initial Vanguard Study.

Authors:  Dean Baker; Christina Park; Carol Sweeney; Lacey McCormack; Maureen Durkin; Ruth Brenner; Dana Dabelea; Barbara Entwisle
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Comparison of Recruitment Strategy Outcomes in the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Christina H Park; Marianne Winglee; Jennifer Kwan; Linda Andrews; Mark L Hudak
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  The National Children's Study: An Introduction and Historical Overview.

Authors:  Mark L Hudak; Christina H Park; Robert D Annett; Daniel E Hale; Patricia M McGovern; Thomas J McLaughlin; Nancy Dole; Jill L Kaar; Marion J Balsam
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The National Children's Study: Recruitment Outcomes Using the Provider-Based Recruitment Approach.

Authors:  Daniel E Hale; Sharon B Wyatt; Stephen Buka; Debra Cherry; Kendall K Cislo; Donald J Dudley; Pearl Anna McElfish; Gwendolyn S Norman; Simone A Reynolds; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Sandra Wadlinger; Cheryl K Walker; James M Robbins
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Pregnancy recruitment for population research: the National Children's Study vanguard experience in Wayne County, Michigan.

Authors:  Jean M Kerver; Michael R Elliott; Gwendolyn S Norman; Robert J Sokol; Daniel P Keating; Glenn E Copeland; Christine C Johnson; Kendall K Cislo; Kirsten H Alcser; Shonda R Kruger-Ndiaye; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Shobha Mehta; Christine L M Joseph; Nigel Paneth
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 8.  European birth cohorts for environmental health research.

Authors:  Martine Vrijheid; Maribel Casas; Anna Bergström; Amanda Carmichael; Sylvaine Cordier; Merete Eggesbø; Esben Eller; Maria P Fantini; Mariana F Fernández; Ana Fernández-Somoano; Ulrike Gehring; Regina Grazuleviciene; Cynthia Hohmann; Anne M Karvonen; Thomas Keil; Manolis Kogevinas; Gudrun Koppen; Ursula Krämer; Claudia E Kuehni; Per Magnus; Renata Majewska; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen; Evridiki Patelarou; Maria Skaalum Petersen; Frank H Pierik; Kinga Polanska; Daniela Porta; Lorenzo Richiardi; Ana Cristina Santos; Rémy Slama; Radim J Sram; Carel Thijs; Christina Tischer; Gunnar Toft; Tomáš Trnovec; Stephanie Vandentorren; Tanja G M Vrijkotte; Michael Wilhelm; John Wright; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Screening for Pregnancy Status in a Population-Based Sample: Characteristics Associated with Item Nonresponse.

Authors:  Suzanne C Hughes; Carol J Hogue; Melissa A Clark; Jessica E Graber; Elaine D Eaker; Amy H Herring
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-03

10.  Effect of Small Monetary Incentive and Demographic Characteristics on Response Rate of Self-Administered Questionnaire Mailed to Rural Women.

Authors:  Lacey A McCormack
Journal:  Online J Rural Res Policy       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.