Literature DB >> 23572592

Characterization of the free-energy landscapes of proteins by NMR-guided metadynamics.

Daniele Granata1, Carlo Camilloni, Michele Vendruscolo, Alessandro Laio.   

Abstract

The use of free-energy landscapes rationalizes a wide range of aspects of protein behavior by providing a clear illustration of the different states accessible to these molecules, as well as of their populations and pathways of interconversion. The determination of the free-energy landscapes of proteins by computational methods is, however, very challenging as it requires an extensive sampling of their conformational spaces. We describe here a technique to achieve this goal with relatively limited computational resources by incorporating nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) chemical shifts as collective variables in metadynamics simulations. As in this approach the chemical shifts are not used as structural restraints, the resulting free-energy landscapes correspond to the force fields used in the simulations. We illustrate this approach in the case of the third Ig-binding domain of protein G from streptococcal bacteria (GB3). Our calculations reveal the existence of a folding intermediate of GB3 with nonnative structural elements. Furthermore, the availability of the free-energy landscape enables the folding mechanism of GB3 to be elucidated by analyzing the conformational ensembles corresponding to the native, intermediate, and unfolded states, as well as the transition states between them. Taken together, these results show that, by incorporating experimental data as collective variables in metadynamics simulations, it is possible to enhance the sampling efficiency by two or more orders of magnitude with respect to standard molecular dynamics simulations, and thus to estimate free-energy differences among the different states of a protein with a k(B)T accuracy by generating trajectories of just a few microseconds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23572592      PMCID: PMC3637744          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1218350110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  47 in total

1.  A simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three-dimensional structures.

Authors:  V Muñoz; W A Eaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state.

Authors:  M Vendruscolo; E Paci; C M Dobson; M Karplus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Critical role of beta-hairpin formation in protein G folding.

Authors:  E L McCallister; E Alm; D Baker
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-08

4.  Molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding from the transition state.

Authors:  Jörg Gsponer; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Transition path sampling: throwing ropes over rough mountain passes, in the dark.

Authors:  Peter G Bolhuis; David Chandler; Christoph Dellago; Phillip L Geissler
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 12.703

Review 6.  Protein folding and unfolding at atomic resolution.

Authors:  Alan R Fersht; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Determination of a transition state at atomic resolution from protein engineering data.

Authors:  Emanuelel Paci; Michele Vendruscolo; Christopher M Dobson; Martin Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Martin Karplus; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-09

9.  Escaping free-energy minima.

Authors:  Alessandro Laio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  44 in total

1.  Destabilizing the AXH Tetramer by Mutations: Mechanisms and Potential Antiaggregation Strategies.

Authors:  Gianvito Grasso; Umberto Morbiducci; Diana Massai; Jack A Tuszynski; Andrea Danani; Marco A Deriu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Accelerating physical simulations of proteins by leveraging external knowledge.

Authors:  Alberto Perez; Joseph A Morrone; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19

Review 3.  Amyloid β Protein and Alzheimer's Disease: When Computer Simulations Complement Experimental Studies.

Authors:  Jessica Nasica-Labouze; Phuong H Nguyen; Fabio Sterpone; Olivia Berthoumieu; Nicolae-Viorel Buchete; Sébastien Coté; Alfonso De Simone; Andrew J Doig; Peter Faller; Angel Garcia; Alessandro Laio; Mai Suan Li; Simone Melchionna; Normand Mousseau; Yuguang Mu; Anant Paravastu; Samuela Pasquali; David J Rosenman; Birgit Strodel; Bogdan Tarus; John H Viles; Tong Zhang; Chunyu Wang; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  The Structural and Functional Diversity of Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Transmembrane Proteins.

Authors:  Rajeswari Appadurai; Vladimir N Uversky; Anand Srivastava
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 5.  Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Equilibrium Ensembles for Insulin Folding from Bias-Exchange Metadynamics.

Authors:  Richa Singh; Rohit Bansal; Anurag Singh Rathore; Gaurav Goel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Equilibrium simulations of proteins using molecular fragment replacement and NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Wouter Boomsma; Pengfei Tian; Jes Frellsen; Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg; Thomas Hamelryck; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Reply to Jensen and Blackledge: Dual quantifications of intrinsically disordered proteins by NMR ensembles and molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Sonia Longhi; Philippe Roche; Jin Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Conserved methionine dictates substrate preference in Nramp-family divalent metal transporters.

Authors:  Aaron T Bozzi; Lukas B Bane; Wilhelm A Weihofen; Anne L McCabe; Abhishek Singharoy; Christophe J Chipot; Klaus Schulten; Rachelle Gaudet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Advances in the determination of nucleic acid conformational ensembles.

Authors:  Loïc Salmon; Shan Yang; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 12.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.