Literature DB >> 33380968

Monitoring Patient Recovery After THA or TKA Using Mobile Technology.

Stephen Lyman1, Chisa Hidaka1, Kara Fields1, Wasif Islam1, David Mayman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smartphones offer the possibility of assessing recovery of mobility after total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA) passively and reliably, as well as facilitating the collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with greater frequency. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We investigated the feasibility of using mobile technology to collect daily step data and biweekly PROMs to track recovery after total joint arthroplasty.
METHODS: Pre- and post-operative daily steps were recorded in prospectively enrolled patients (128 THA and 139 TKA) via an app, which uses the phone's accelerometer. During 6-month follow-up, patients also completed PROMs (the pain numeric rating scale, the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement [HOOS JR] and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement [KOOS JR]), and HOOS or KOOS JR quality of life domain via a mobile-enabled web link.
RESULTS: At least 6 months of follow-up was completed by 65% for THA and 68% for TKA patients. Reasons for non-completion included time commitment, phone battery, app issues, and health complications. Responses from 78% of requested PROMs were returned with 96% of patients returning at least one post-operative PROM. Step data were available from 92% of days from male patients and 86% of days from female patients. The most robust recovery occurred early, within the first 2 months. The groups with higher pre-operative steps were more likely to recover their maximum daily steps at an earlier time point. Correlations between step counts and PROMs scores were modest.
CONCLUSION: Assessing large amounts of post-TKA and post-THA step data using mobile technology is feasible. Completion rates were good, making the technology very useful for collecting frequent PROMs. Being unable to ensure that patients always carried their phones limited our analysis of the step counts. © Hospital for Special Surgery 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accelerometer; mobile health; post-operative mobility; total joint arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 33380968      PMCID: PMC7749883          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-019-09746-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  36 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness and practice variation of rehabilitation after joint replacement.

Authors:  Ewa M Roos
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Defining high activity in arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  N B Robertson; A K Battenberg; M Kertzner; T P Schmalzried
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Do activity levels increase after total hip and knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Paula Harding; Anne E Holland; Clare Delany; Rana S Hinman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Status of physiotherapy rehabilitation after total knee replacement in Australia.

Authors:  Justine Naylor; Alison Harmer; Marlene Fransen; Jack Crosbie; Lesley Innes
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2006-03

5.  Osteoarthritis Index delivered by mobile phone (m-WOMAC) is valid, reliable, and responsive.

Authors:  Nicholas Bellamy; Cecilia Wilson; Joan Hendrikz; Sarah L Whitehouse; Bipin Patel; Simon Dennison; Tim Davis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 6.  How active are patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty?: A systematic review.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Franco M Impellizzeri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Management and care of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: variations across different health care settings.

Authors:  E A Lingard; S Berven; J N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  2000-06

8.  Which functional assessments predict long-term wear after total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan K Takenaga; John J Callaghan; Nicholas A Bedard; Steve S Liu; Yubo Gao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Does Physical Activity Increase After Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  John B Arnold; Julie L Walters; Katia E Ferrar
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 10.  Accelerometers for objective evaluation of physical activity following spine surgery.

Authors:  Prashanth J Rao; Kevin Phan; Monish M Maharaj; Matthew H Pelletier; William R Walsh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 1.961

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The role of commercially available smartphone apps and wearable devices in monitoring patients after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  David Constantinescu; William Pavlis; Michael Rizzo; Dennis Vanden Berge; Spencer Barnhill; Victor Hugo Hernandez
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-07-05

2.  Designing the Optimal Digital Health Intervention for Patients' Use Before and After Elective Orthopedic Surgery: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Anna Robinson; Robert D Slight; Andrew K Husband; Sarah P Slight
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  A Web-Based Communication Tool for Postoperative Follow-up and Pain Assessment at Home After Primary Knee Arthroplasty: Feasibility and Usability Study.

Authors:  Torbjørn Rian; Kari Sand; Eirik Skogvoll; Pål Klepstad; Tina S Wik
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.