Literature DB >> 23568338

Investigation of image lag and modulation transfer function in fluoroscopy images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector.

Hiroki Kawashima1, Rie Tanaka, Katsuhiro Ichikawa, Kosuke Matsubara, Hiroji Iida, Shigeru Sanada.   

Abstract

Digital imaging with a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD) is commonly used in clinical practice. However, several factors reduce the accuracy of target tracking in fluoroscopic imaging, including image lag and blurring. There have been several reports focusing on the modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) in different types of FPD. However, there have been no studies comparing image lag and MTF properties in dynamic images obtained with indirect- and direct-conversion FPDs. We investigated the image lag and MTF under several imaging conditions in fluoroscopic images obtained with an indirect-conversion and a direct-conversion FPD system. The measurements of image lag and MTF were obtained under several conditions according to IEC 62220-1-3 standards. We examined whether the image lag and MTF were influenced by the dose level and target movement speed. Indirect-conversion FPD showed dependence on the dose level, which was not observed for direct-conversion FPD. Furthermore, there were large differences in MTF between images of static and moving plate with indirect-conversion FPD in comparison to the differences observed with direct-conversion FPD. These results will be useful for the determination of imaging conditions for target tracking and other types of dynamic imaging.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23568338     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-013-0210-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  12 in total

1.  A ghost story: spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager.

Authors:  J H Siewerdsen; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Real-time tumour-tracking radiotherapy.

Authors:  H Shirato; S Shimizu; T Shimizu; T Nishioka; K Miyasaka
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Investigation on effect of image lag in fluoroscopic images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD) on accuracy of target tracking in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rie Tanaka; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Shinichiro Mori; Suguru Dobashi; Motoki Kumagai; Hiroki Kawashima; Shinichi Minohara; Sigeru Sanada
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  The effect of tumor location and respiratory function on tumor movement estimated by real-time tracking radiotherapy (RTRT) system.

Authors:  Rikiya Onimaru; Hiroki Shirato; Masaharu Fujino; Keishiro Suzuki; Kouichi Yamazaki; Masaharu Nishimura; Hirotoshi Dosaka-Akita; Kazuo Miyasaka
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Dynamic targeting image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Calvin Huntzinger; Peter Munro; Scott Johnson; Mika Miettinen; Corey Zankowski; Greg Ahlstrom; Reto Glettig; Reto Filliberti; Wolfgang Kaissl; Martin Kamber; Martin Amstutz; Lionel Bouchet; Dan Klebanov; Hassan Mostafavi; Richard Stark
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.482

8.  Development of quality control system for flat-panel detectors.

Authors:  Atsushi Teramoto; Takahiko Kajihara; Shoichi Suzuki; Kazuo Kinoshita; Masatoshi Tsuzaka; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-03-17

9.  Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system.

Authors:  Aili K Bloomquist; Martin J Yaffe; Gordon E Mawdsley; David M Hunter; Daniel J Beideck
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Lag measurement in an a-Se active matrix flat-panel imager.

Authors:  C Schroeder; T Stanescu; S Rathee; B G Fallone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  2 in total

1.  Photon-counting hexagonal pixel array CdTe detector: Spatial resolution characteristics for image-guided interventional applications.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Suman Shrestha; Andrew Karellas; Linxi Shi; Matthew J Gounis; Ronaldo Bellazzini; Gloria Spandre; Alessandro Brez; Massimo Minuti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Conditional Covariances for the Signal Lag Measurements in Fluoroscopic Imaging.

Authors:  Eunae Lee; Dong Sik Kim
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.