Literature DB >> 23563847

Tracer-kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT: a primer.

Michael Ingrisch1, Steven Sourbron.   

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) are functional imaging techniques. They aim to characterise the microcirculation by applying the principles of tracer-kinetic analysis to concentration-time curves measured in individual image pixels. In this paper, we review the basic principles of DCE-MRI and DCE-CT, with a specific emphasis on the use of tracer-kinetic modeling. The aim is to provide an introduction to the field for a broader audience of pharmacokinetic modelers. In a first part, we first review the key aspects of data acquisition in DCE-CT and DCE-MRI, including a review of basic measurement strategies, a discussion on the relation between signal and concentration, and the problem of measuring reference data in arterial blood. In a second part, we define the four main parameters that can be measured with these techniques and review the most common tracer-kinetic models that are used in this field. We first discuss the models for the capillary bed and then define the most general four-parameter models used today: the two-compartment exchange model, the tissue-homogeneity model, the "adiabatic approximation to the tissue-homogeneity model" and the distributed-parameter model. In simpler tissue types or when the data quality is inadequate to resolve all the features of the more complex models, it is often necessary to resort to simpler models, which are special cases of the general models and hence have less parameters. We discuss the most common of these special cases, i.e. the uptake models, the extended Tofts model, and the one-compartment model. Models for two specific tissue types, liver and kidney, are discussed separately. We conclude with a review of practical aspects of DCE-CT and DCE-MRI data analysis, including the problem of identifying a suitable model for any given data set, and a brief discussion of the application of tracer-kinetic modeling in the context of drug development. Here, an important application of DCE techniques is the derivation of quantitative imaging biomarkers for the assessment of effects of targeted therapeutics on tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23563847     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-013-9315-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  124 in total

Review 1.  Fundamentals of tracer kinetics for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Tong San Koh; Sotirios Bisdas; Dow Mu Koh; Choon Hua Thng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Renal function measurements from MR renography and a simplified multicompartmental model.

Authors:  Vivian S Lee; Henry Rusinek; Louisa Bokacheva; Ambrose J Huang; Niels Oesingmann; Qun Chen; Manmeen Kaur; Keyma Prince; Ting Song; Elissa L Kramer; Edward F Leonard
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2007-01-09

3.  Bolus-tracking MRI with a simultaneous T1- and T2*-measurement.

Authors:  S Sourbron; M Heilmann; A Biffar; C Walczak; J Vautier; A Volk; M Peller
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  UMMPerfusion: an open source software tool towards quantitative MRI perfusion analysis in clinical routine.

Authors:  Frank G Zöllner; Gerald Weisser; Marcel Reich; Sven Kaiser; Stefan O Schoenberg; Steven P Sourbron; Lothar R Schad
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Myocardial blood flow at rest and stress measured with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison of a distributed parameter model with a Fermi function model.

Authors:  David A Broadbent; John D Biglands; Abdulghani Larghat; Steven P Sourbron; Aleksandra Radjenovic; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein; David L Buckley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Dynamic, contrast-enhanced CT of human brain tumors: quantitative assessment of blood volume, blood flow, and microvascular permeability: report of two cases.

Authors:  Heidi C Roberts; Timothy P L Roberts; Ting-Yim Lee; William P Dillon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Assessing tumor perfusion and treatment response in rectal cancer with multisection CT: initial observations.

Authors:  Dushyant V Sahani; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Leena M Hamberg; Peter F Hahn; Christopher G Willett; Sanjay Saini; Peter R Mueller; Ting-Yim Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Quantitative tumor perfusion assessment with multidetector CT: are measurements from two commercial software packages interchangeable?

Authors:  Vicky Goh; Steve Halligan; Clive I Bartram
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Database of normal human cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, cerebral oxygen extraction fraction and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen measured by positron emission tomography with 15O-labelled carbon dioxide or water, carbon monoxide and oxygen: a multicentre study in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ito; Iwao Kanno; Chietsugu Kato; Toshiaki Sasaki; Kenji Ishii; Yasuomi Ouchi; Akihiko Iida; Hidehiko Okazawa; Kohei Hayashida; Naohiro Tsuyuguchi; Kazunari Ishii; Yasuo Kuwabara; Michio Senda
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Blood-brain barrier imaging in human neuropathologies.

Authors:  Ronel Veksler; Ilan Shelef; Alon Friedman
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Anti-angiogenic Effects of Bumetanide Revealed by DCE-MRI with a Biodegradable Macromolecular Contrast Agent in a Colon Cancer Model.

Authors:  Anthony S Malamas; Erlei Jin; Qi Zhang; John Haaga; Zheng-Rong Lu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Quantitative multimodality imaging in cancer research and therapy.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Richard G Abramson; C Chad Quarles
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Differential Spatial Distribution of TSPO or Amino Acid PET Signal and MRI Contrast Enhancement in Gliomas.

Authors:  Lena Kaiser; Adrien Holzgreve; Stefanie Quach; Michael Ingrisch; Marcus Unterrainer; Franziska J Dekorsy; Simon Lindner; Viktoria Ruf; Julia Brosch-Lenz; Astrid Delker; Guido Böning; Bogdana Suchorska; Maximilian Niyazi; Christian H Wetzel; Markus J Riemenschneider; Sophia Stöcklein; Matthias Brendel; Rainer Rupprecht; Niklas Thon; Louisa von Baumgarten; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Peter Bartenstein; Sibylle Ziegler; Nathalie L Albert
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  [Therapy monitoring of neoadjuvant therapy with MRI. RECIST and functional imaging].

Authors:  S Grandl; M Ingrisch; K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Image registration for quantitative parametric response mapping of cancer treatment response.

Authors:  Jennifer L Boes; Benjamin A Hoff; Nola Hylton; Martin D Pickles; Lindsay W Turnbull; Anne F Schott; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Ryan Chamberlain; Benjamin Lemasson; Thomas L Chenevert; Craig J Galbán; Charles R Meyer; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  The Added Prognostic Value of Preoperative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Histogram Analysis in Patients with Glioblastoma: Analysis of Overall and Progression-Free Survival.

Authors:  Y S Choi; D W Kim; S-K Lee; J H Chang; S-G Kang; E H Kim; S H Kim; T H Rim; S S Ahn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  DCE-MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma-clinical and therapeutic image biomarker.

Authors:  Bang-Bin Chen; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Distinguishing metastatic triple-negative breast cancer from nonmetastatic breast cancer using second harmonic generation imaging and resonance Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ethan Bendau; Jason Smith; Lin Zhang; Ellen Ackerstaff; Natalia Kruchevsky; Binlin Wu; Jason A Koutcher; Robert Alfano; Lingyan Shi
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.207

10.  [PET-MR in patients with glioblastoma multiforme].

Authors:  B Ertl-Wagner; M Ingrisch; M Niyazi; O Schnell; N Jansen; S Förster; C la Fougère
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.