Literature DB >> 23417985

Myocardial blood flow at rest and stress measured with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison of a distributed parameter model with a Fermi function model.

David A Broadbent1, John D Biglands, Abdulghani Larghat, Steven P Sourbron, Aleksandra Radjenovic, John P Greenwood, Sven Plein, David L Buckley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of simultaneously measuring blood flow (Fb ), Gd-DTPA extraction fraction (E), and distribution volume (vd ) in healthy myocardium at rest and under adenosine stress using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
METHODS: Sixteen volunteers were examined at 1.5 T and 11 returned for a repeat study. The data were analyzed using a distributed parameter (DP) 2-region model to arrive at estimates of Fb , E, blood volume, and interstitial volume. For comparison, estimates of Fb were also obtained using a Fermi function model.
RESULTS: DP model fits were successful in 49 of the 54 data sets. Estimates obtained using DP and Fermi models did not differ for either rest Fb or myocardial perfusion reserve though DP estimates of stress Fb were lower than Fermi estimates. The repeatability of the DP parameters Fb , E, and vd was better than or equal to the repeatability of Fermi-Fb . E at rest and under stress was estimated to be 66% and 57%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that characteristics of the microvasculature of healthy myocardium can be reliably determined using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at rest and under stress and that delivery of Gd-DTPA to the myocardium is not flow-limited.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extraction fraction; myocardial blood flow; myocardial perfusion reserve; reproducibility; tracer kinetic modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23417985     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  23 in total

Review 1.  Tracer-kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT: a primer.

Authors:  Michael Ingrisch; Steven Sourbron
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Robust Non-Rigid Motion Compensation of Free-Breathing Myocardial Perfusion MRI Data.

Authors:  Cian M Scannell; Adriana D M Villa; Jack Lee; Marcel Breeuwer; Amedeo Chiribiri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  Advances in MRI Applications to Diagnose and Manage Cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Ramya Vajapey; Brendan Eck; Wilson Tang; Deborah H Kwon
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-11-27

Review 4.  PET/MR: Yet another Tesla?

Authors:  Markus Schwaiger; Karl Kunze; Christoph Rischpler; Stephan G Nekolla
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Authors:  Amit R Patel; Michael Salerno; Raymond Y Kwong; Amita Singh; Bobak Heydari; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 27.203

6.  Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Four Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Estimation Methods Used in Cardiac MR Imaging: CE-MARC Substudy.

Authors:  John D Biglands; Derek R Magee; Steven P Sourbron; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood; Aleksandra Radjenovic
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Automated detection of left ventricle in arterial input function images for inline perfusion mapping using deep learning: A study of 15,000 patients.

Authors:  Hui Xue; Ethan Tseng; Kristopher D Knott; Tushar Kotecha; Louise Brown; Sven Plein; Marianna Fontana; James C Moon; Peter Kellman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.737

8.  Measurement of myocardial blood flow by cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion: comparison of distributed parameter and Fermi models with single and dual bolus.

Authors:  Giorgos Papanastasiou; Michelle C Williams; Lucy E Kershaw; Marc R Dweck; Shirjel Alam; Saeed Mirsadraee; Martin Connell; Calum Gray; Tom MacGillivray; David E Newby; Scott Ik Semple
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Automatic in-line quantitative myocardial perfusion mapping: Processing algorithm and implementation.

Authors:  Hui Xue; Louise A E Brown; Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; Sven Plein; Peter Kellman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Multimodality quantitative assessments of myocardial perfusion using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance and 15O-labelled water positron emission tomography imaging.

Authors:  G Papanastasiou; M C Williams; M R Dweck; S Mirsadraee; N Weir; A Fletcher; C Lucatelli; D Patel; E J R van Beek; D E Newby; S I K Semple
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.