Literature DB >> 25113842

Quantitative multimodality imaging in cancer research and therapy.

Thomas E Yankeelov1, Richard G Abramson1, C Chad Quarles1.   

Abstract

Advances in hardware and software have enabled the realization of clinically feasible, quantitative multimodality imaging of tissue pathophysiology. Earlier efforts relating to multimodality imaging of cancer have focused on the integration of anatomical and functional characteristics, such as PET-CT and single-photon emission CT (SPECT-CT), whereas more-recent advances and applications have involved the integration of multiple quantitative, functional measurements (for example, multiple PET tracers, varied MRI contrast mechanisms, and PET-MRI), thereby providing a more-comprehensive characterization of the tumour phenotype. The enormous amount of complementary quantitative data generated by such studies is beginning to offer unique insights into opportunities to optimize care for individual patients. Although important technical optimization and improved biological interpretation of multimodality imaging findings are needed, this approach can already be applied informatively in clinical trials of cancer therapeutics using existing tools. These concepts are discussed herein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25113842      PMCID: PMC4909117          DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1759-4774            Impact factor:   66.675


  74 in total

1.  Effects of cell volume fraction changes on apparent diffusion in human cells.

Authors:  A W Anderson; J Xie; J Pizzonia; R A Bronen; D D Spencer; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 2.  Joint SNM/RSNA Molecular Imaging Summit Statement.

Authors:  Mathew L Thakur; Brian C Lentle
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Quantitative BOLD: mapping of human cerebral deoxygenated blood volume and oxygen extraction fraction: default state.

Authors:  Xiang He; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Hybrid imaging (SPECT/CT and PET/CT)--improving the diagnostic accuracy of functional/metabolic and anatomic imaging.

Authors:  Einat Even-Sapir; Zohar Keidar; Rachel Bar-Shalom
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  Transmission scanning: a useful adjunct to conventional emission scanning for accurately keying isotope deposition to radiographic anatomy.

Authors:  D E Kuhl; J Hale; W L Eaton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Diagnostic value of combined ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI for staging and restaging in paediatric oncology.

Authors:  Thomas Pfluger; Henriette I Melzer; Wolfgang P Mueller; Eva Coppenrath; Peter Bartenstein; Michael H Albert; Irene Schmid
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set.

Authors:  David A Gutman; Lee A D Cooper; Scott N Hwang; Chad A Holder; Jingjing Gao; Tarun D Aurora; William D Dunn; Lisa Scarpace; Tom Mikkelsen; Rajan Jain; Max Wintermark; Manal Jilwan; Prashant Raghavan; Erich Huang; Robert J Clifford; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Pascal O Zinn; Carlos S Moreno; Carl Jaffe; Rivka Colen; Daniel L Rubin; Joel Saltz; Adam Flanders; Daniel J Brat
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Radiogenomic mapping of edema/cellular invasion MRI-phenotypes in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Pascal O Zinn; Bhanu Mahajan; Bhanu Majadan; Pratheesh Sathyan; Sanjay K Singh; Sadhan Majumder; Ferenc A Jolesz; Rivka R Colen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Molecular imaging probes for diagnosis and therapy evaluation of breast cancer.

Authors:  Qingqing Meng; Zheng Li
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-02-26
View more
  44 in total

1.  Calibrating a Predictive Model of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis with Quantitative MRI.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Xinzeng Feng; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  Mechanism-Based Modeling of Tumor Growth and Treatment Response Constrained by Multiparametric Imaging Data.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; Matthew T McKenna; David T Fuentes; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-02

3.  Predicting in vivo glioma growth with the reaction diffusion equation constrained by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Erin C Rericha; Vito Quaranta; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Automated registration of magnetic resonance imaging and optoacoustic tomography data for experimental studies.

Authors:  Wuwei Ren; Hlynur Skulason; Felix Schlegel; Markus Rudin; Jan Klohs; Ruiqing Ni
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.593

5.  Protein MRI contrast agent with unprecedented metal selectivity and sensitivity for liver cancer imaging.

Authors:  Shenghui Xue; Hua Yang; Jingjuan Qiao; Fan Pu; Jie Jiang; Kendra Hubbard; Khan Hekmatyar; Jason Langley; Mani Salarian; Robert C Long; Robert G Bryant; Xiaoping Philip Hu; Hans E Grossniklaus; Zhi-Ren Liu; Jenny J Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Repeatability and reproducibility of 3D MR fingerprinting relaxometry measurements in normal breast tissue.

Authors:  Ananya Panda; Yong Chen; Kathleen Ropella-Panagis; Satyam Ghodasara; Marcie Stopchinski; Nicole Seyfried; Katherine Wright; Nicole Seiberlich; Mark Griswold; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Highly fluorinated metal complexes as dual 19F and PARACEST imaging agents.

Authors:  Meng Yu; Bailey S Bouley; Da Xie; Emily L Que
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 4.390

Review 8.  MR Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Adrienne N Dula; C Chad Quarles; Ashley M Stokes; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Igor Zhukov; Jason M Williams; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

9.  Quantitative [18F]FMISO PET Imaging Shows Reduction of Hypoxia Following Trastuzumab in a Murine Model of HER2+ Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Anum K Syed; Stephanie L Barnes; C Chad Quarles; Violeta Sanchez; Hakmook Kang; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Correlation of tumor characteristics derived from DCE-MRI and DW-MRI with histology in murine models of breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie L Barnes; Anna G Sorace; Mary E Loveless; Jennifer G Whisenant; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.