Literature DB >> 8698161

Compression and its effect on the speech signal.

J Verschuure1, A J Maas, E Stikvoort, R M de Jong, A Goedegebure, W A Dreschler.   

Abstract

Compression systems are often used in hearing aids to increase the wearing comfort. A patient has to readjust frequently the gain of a linear hearing aid because of the limited dynamic hearing range and the changing acoustical conditions. A great deal of attention has been given to the static parameters but very little to the dynamic parameters. We present a general method to describe the dynamic behavior of a compression system by comparing modulations at the output with modulations at the input. The use of this method resulted in a single parameter describing the temporal characteristics of a compressor, the cut-off modulation frequency. In this paper its value is compared with known properties of running speech. A limitation of this method is the use of only small modulation depths, and the consequence of this limitation is tested. The use of this method is described for an experimental digital compressor developed by the authors, and the effects of some temporal parameters such as attack and release time are studied. This method shows the rather large effects of some of the parameters on the effectiveness of a compressor on speech. This method is also used to analyze two generally accepted compression systems in hearing aids. The theoretical method is next compared to the effects of compression on the distribution of the amplitude envelope of running speech, and it could be shown that single-channel compression systems do not reduce the distribution width of speech filtered in frequency bands. This finding questions the use of compression systems for fitting the speech banana in the dynamic hearing range of impaired listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8698161     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199604000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  13 in total

1.  Level discrimination of speech sounds by hearing-impaired individuals with and without hearing amplification.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  The choice of compression speed in hearing AIDS: theoretical and practical considerations and the role of individual differences.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

3.  Development of digital hearing AIDS.

Authors:  C Schweitzer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-06

4.  Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-12

5.  Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.

Authors:  C V Palmer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-03

6.  Effects of dynamic range compression on spatial selective auditory attention in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Andrew H Schwartz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Classification of Hearing Aids Into Feature Profiles Using Hierarchical Latent Class Analysis Applied to a Large Dataset of Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Simon Lansbergen; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effects of WDRC release time and number of channels on output SNR and speech recognition.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Katie Masterson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Pamela Souza; Marc Brennan; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Electroacoustic Comparison of Hearing Aid Output of Phonemes in Running Speech versus Isolation: Implications for Aided Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Testing.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; David W Purcell; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.