Literature DB >> 16672796

Influence of dynamic compression on directional hearing in the horizontal plane.

Sharbal Musa-Shufani1, Martin Walger, Hasso von Wedel, Hartmut Meister.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of dynamic compression on directional hearing in the frontal horizontal plane.
DESIGN: Compression schemes with various compression ratios and attack times were created by using a digital signal processor. The influence of compression on isolated interaural level differences (ILDs) and interaural time differences (ITDs) was examined in discrimination experiments. The combination of ILDs and ITDs was investigated with measurements of localization based on head-related transfer functions. Five normal listeners and seven hearing-impaired subjects participated in the study.
RESULTS: Dynamic compression revealed substantial effects on discrimination of ILDs but not on ITDs. With higher compression ratios and shorter attack times, just-noticeable differences for ILDs increased. Lateralization via head-related transfer functions was predominantly affected by compression in the higher frequency range because for lower frequencies, interaural time cues dominate over interaural level cues. The effect of compression was similar for normal and hearing-impaired listeners, but the latter performed worse on almost all tasks, especially with ITD discrimination at 4000 Hz.
CONCLUSIONS: The influence of compression ratio and attack time could be shown for ILDs, but the effect was rather small, at least for the low compression ratios commonly used in hearing aids. The influence further decreased when attack time was prolonged. The dramatic impairment of the discrimination of ITDs with the hearing-impaired subjects in the high-frequency range suggests that they primarily rely on ILD cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16672796     DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215972.68797.5e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  17 in total

1.  Localization of sound in rooms. V. Binaural coherence and human sensitivity to interaural time differences in noise.

Authors:  Brad Rakerd; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Level discrimination of speech sounds by hearing-impaired individuals with and without hearing amplification.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Mapping procedures can produce non-centered auditory images in bilateral cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of dynamic range compression on spatial selective auditory attention in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Andrew H Schwartz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Bilateral Loudness Balancing and Distorted Spatial Perception in Recipients of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Simulations of the effect of unlinked cochlear-implant automatic gain control and head movement on interaural level differences.

Authors:  Alan W Archer-Boyd; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The Effects of Hearing Impairment, Age, and Hearing Aids on the Use of Self-Motion for Determining Front/Back Location.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.