Literature DB >> 9637047

Adapting to supernormal auditory localization cues. I. Bias and resolution.

B G Shinn-Cunningham1, N I Durlach, R M Held.   

Abstract

Head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) were used to create spatialized stimuli for presentation through earphones. Subjects performed forced-choice, identification tests during which allowed response directions were indicated visually. In each experimental session, subjects were first presented with auditory stimuli in which the stimulus HRTFs corresponded to the allowed response directions. The correspondence between the HRTFs used to generate the stimuli and the directions was then changed so that response directions no longer corresponded to the HRTFs in the natural way. Feedback was used to train subjects as to which spatial cues corresponded to which of the allowed responses. Finally, the normal correspondence between direction and HRTFs was reinstated. This basic experimental paradigm was used to explore the effects of the type of feedback provided, the complexity of the stimulated acoustic scene, the number of allowed response positions, and the magnitude of the HRTF transformation subjects had to learn. Data showed that (1) although subjects may not adapt completely to a new relationship between physical stimuli and direction, response bias decreases substantially with training, and (2) the ability to resolve different HRTFs depends both on the stimuli presented and on the state of adaptation of the subject.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9637047     DOI: 10.1121/1.423088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Can measures of sound localization acuity be related to the precision of absolute location estimates?

Authors:  Jordan M Moore; Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Effects of dynamic range compression on spatial selective auditory attention in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Andrew H Schwartz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.

Authors:  Ashley Zaleski-King; Matthew J Goupell; Dragana Barac-Cikoja; Matthew Bakke
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source location.

Authors:  B A Wright; M B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Localization training results in individuals with unilateral severe to profound hearing loss.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Noël Y Dwyer; Harold Burton; Laura K Holden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Adaptive reweighting of auditory localization cues in response to chronic unilateral earplugging in humans.

Authors:  Daniel P Kumpik; Oliver Kacelnik; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Physiological and behavioral studies of spatial coding in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Victoria M Bajo; Jennifer K Bizley; Robert A A Campbell; Fernando R Nodal; Andreas L Schulz; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  3-D localization of virtual sound sources: effects of visual environment, pointing method, and training.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  A Device for Human Ultrasonic Echolocation.

Authors:  Jascha Sohl-Dickstein; Santani Teng; Benjamin M Gaub; Chris C Rodgers; Crystal Li; Michael R DeWeese; Nicol S Harper
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Lesions of the auditory cortex impair azimuthal sound localization and its recalibration in ferrets.

Authors:  Fernando R Nodal; Oliver Kacelnik; Victoria M Bajo; Jennifer K Bizley; David R Moore; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.