Literature DB >> 34100627

Effects of Bilateral Automatic Gain Control Synchronization in Cochlear Implants With and Without Head Movements: Sound Source Localization in the Frontal Hemifield.

M Torben Pastore1, Kathryn R Pulling1, Chen Chen2, William A Yost1, Michael F Dorman1.   

Abstract

Purpose For bilaterally implanted patients, the automatic gain control (AGC) in both left and right cochlear implant (CI) processors is usually neither linked nor synchronized. At high AGC compression ratios, this lack of coordination between the two processors can distort interaural level differences, the only useful interaural difference cue available to CI patients. This study assessed the improvement, if any, in the utility of interaural level differences for sound source localization in the frontal hemifield when AGCs were synchronized versus independent and when listeners were stationary versus allowed to move their heads. Method Sound source identification of broadband noise stimuli was tested for seven bilateral CI patients using 13 loudspeakers in the frontal hemifield, under conditions where AGCs were linked and unlinked. For half the conditions, patients remained stationary; in the other half, they were encouraged to rotate or reorient their heads within a range of approximately ± 30° during sound presentation. Results In general, those listeners who already localized reasonably well with independent AGCs gained the least from AGC synchronization, perhaps because there was less room for improvement. Those listeners who performed worst with independent AGCs gained the most from synchronization. All listeners performed as well or better with synchronization than without; however, intersubject variability was high. Head movements had little impact on the effectiveness of synchronization of AGCs. Conclusion Synchronization of AGCs offers one promising strategy for improving localization performance in the frontal hemifield for bilaterally implanted CI patients. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14681412.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34100627      PMCID: PMC8632503          DOI: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  40 in total

1.  Dynamic-range compression affects the lateral position of sounds.

Authors:  Ian M Wiggins; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  D Wesley Grantham; Daniel H Ashmead; Todd A Ricketts; Robert F Labadie; David S Haynes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Comparison of dual-time-constant and fast-acting automatic gain control (AGC) systems in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Patrick J Boyle; Andreas Büchner; Michael A Stone; Thomas Lenarz; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Sound source localization identification accuracy: bandwidth dependencies.

Authors:  William A Yost; Xuan Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech Understanding in Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants: Effects of Hearing Configuration, Source Location Certainty, and Head Movement.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Louise Loiselle; Sarah Natale; Sterling W Sheffield; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Mary S Dietrich; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Interaural level differences and sound source localization for bilateral cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Louise Loiselle; Josh Stohl; William A Yost; Anthony Spahr; Chris Brown; Sarah Cook
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Bradford G Bichey; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  The benefit of head orientation to speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  Jacques A Grange; John F Culling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Stefan Kerber; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for Fitting Cochlear Implants Bimodally and to the Single-Sided Deaf.

Authors:  Sabrina H Pieper; Noura Hamze; Stefan Brill; Sabine Hochmuth; Mats Exter; Marek Polak; Andreas Radeloff; Michael Buschermöhle; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

2.  A Compact Two-Loudspeaker Virtual Sound Reproduction System for Clinical Testing of Spatial Hearing With Hearing-Assistive Devices.

Authors:  Eric C Hamdan; Mark D Fletcher
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.