Literature DB >> 1464568

Basilar membrane mechanics in the hook region of cat and guinea-pig cochleae: sharp tuning and nonlinearity in the absence of baseline position shifts.

N P Cooper1, W S Rhode.   

Abstract

A heterodyne laser interferometer was used to observe the movements of small (approximately 20 microns) stainless-steel beads placed on the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea-pig cochleae. In several preparations, the displacement patterns observed exhibited sharp nonlinear tuning; in one cat this tuning was comparable to that commonly observed in single auditory-nerve fibers. The most sensitive frequencies of the preparations ranged from 31-40 kHz in the cat, and 28-32 kHz in the guinea-pig. The sharp tuning and nonlinearity of the basilar membrane responses was not apparent in surgically or acoustically traumatized preparations. The response nonlinearities were susceptible to temporary threshold shifts and disappeared within a few minutes post-mortem. Stimulus-related shifts in the baseline position of the basilar membrane were not apparent at low stimulus levels. Such shifts were occasionally observed at higher stimulus levels (e.g., > 90 dB SPL), but never approached the fundamental (oscillatory) component of basilar membrane vibration in magnitude. These findings are discussed in relation to previous observations by other workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1464568     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90083-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  57 in total

1.  The spatial and temporal representation of a tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane.

Authors:  K E Nilsen; I J Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mechanical bases of frequency tuning and neural excitation at the base of the cochlea: comparison of basilar-membrane vibrations and auditory-nerve-fiber responses in chinchilla.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; S S Narayan; A N Temchin; A Recio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Centrifugal pathways protect hearing sensitivity at the cochlea in noisy environments that exacerbate the damage induced by loud sound.

Authors:  R Rajan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Separate mechanical processes underlie fast and slow effects of medial olivocochlear efferent activity.

Authors:  N P Cooper; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea.

Authors:  Tianying Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The roles of the external, middle, and inner ears in determining the bandwidth of hearing.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero; Andrei N Temchin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Reply to "on cochlear impedances and the miscomputation of power gain" by Shera et Al. J. Assoc. Re. Otolaryngol.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Wenxuan He; Peter G Gillespie
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-21

9.  Response to a pure tone in a nonlinear mechanical-electrical-acoustical model of the cochlea.

Authors:  Julien Meaud; Karl Grosh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Ongoing temporal coding of a stochastic stimulus as a function of intensity: time-intensity trading.

Authors:  Pascal Michelet; Damir Kovacić; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.