| Literature DB >> 23555835 |
Joseph P Peacock1, Jessica K Cole, Senthil K Murugapiran, Jeremy A Dodsworth, Jenny C Fisher, Duane P Moser, Brian P Hedlund.
Abstract
To characterize high-temperature cellulolytic microbial communities, two lignocellulosic substrates, ammonia fiber-explosion-treated corn stover and aspen shavings, were incubated at average temperatures of 77 and 85°C in the sediment and water column of Great Boiling Spring, Nevada. Comparison of 109,941 quality-filtered 16S rRNA gene pyrosequences (pyrotags) from eight enrichments to 37,057 quality-filtered pyrotags from corresponding natural samples revealed distinct enriched communities dominated by phylotypes related to cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic Thermotoga and Dictyoglomus, cellulolytic and sugar-fermenting Desulfurococcales, and sugar-fermenting and hydrogenotrophic Archaeoglobales. Minor enriched populations included close relatives of hydrogenotrophic Thermodesulfobacteria, the candidate bacterial phylum OP9, and candidate archaeal groups C2 and DHVE3. Enrichment temperature was the major factor influencing community composition, with a negative correlation between temperature and richness, followed by lignocellulosic substrate composition. This study establishes the importance of these groups in the natural degradation of lignocellulose at high temperatures and suggests that a substantial portion of the diversity of thermophiles contributing to consortial cellulolysis may be contained within lineages that have representatives in pure culture.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23555835 PMCID: PMC3612082 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059927
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Photograph of GBS with sample incubation sites, Site 85 and Site 77, indicated.
Sample incubation conditions and pyrotag yields.
| Sample Name | Avg. Temp. (°C) | Site | Enrichment | Incubation Location | Ni
| Nf
|
| UW | 81 | Water | None | na | na | 11,233 |
| U77 | 74 | 77 | None | na | na | 11,308 |
| U85 | 83 | 85 | None | na | na | 14,516 |
| 77AS | 77 | 77 | Aspen | Sediment | 29,188 | 21,006 |
| 77AW | 77 | 77 | Aspen | Water | 25,528 | 18,924 |
| 77CS | 77 | 77 | Corn Stover | Sediment | 17,266 | 12,128 |
| 77CW | 77 | 77 | Corn Stover | Water | 14,527 | 10,565 |
| 85AS | 85 | 85 | Aspen | Sediment | 7,094 | 4,842 |
| 85AW | 85 | 85 | Aspen | Water | 12,167 | 8,259 |
| 85CS | 85 | 85 | Corn Stover | Sediment | 20,416 | 12,868 |
| 85CW | 85 | 85 | Corn Stover | Water | 32,241 | 21,349 |
Average temperature of natural samples or as recorded during incubation (Figure 1).
na, not applicable.
Number of pyrotags generated by pyrosequencing.
Number of quality-filtered pyrotags used in analysis.
Figure 2Composition of non-incubated and incubated lignocellulosic substrates.
(a) Ash content. (b) Cellulose to hemicellulose ratio.
Figure 3Natural and enriched samples clustered based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity calculations of rarefied samples.
(a) Cluster tree with samples grouped according to the similarity of the community composition of the samples. All nodes were supported by jackknife scores ≥99.9% after 1000 permutations. (b) PCoA of sample distances on principal coordinate 1 (P1) and principal coordinate 2 (P2), with a total of 63.85% of variation explained. (c) PCoA showing sample distances on principal coordinate 2 (P2) and principal coordinate 3 (P3), with a total of 46.29% of variation explained.
Significant OTUs discriminating between enrichment and natural samples.
| OTU | Identity | Δ | Contrib. (%) | Natural Samples (%) | Enrichment Samples (%) |
| C529 |
| + | 10.76 | 0.04 | 19.25 |
| C603 | GAL35 | − | 10.36 | 21.89 | 3.47 |
| C056 | “ | − | 9.18 | 16.67 | 0.28 |
| C199 |
| − | 6.22 | 11.61 | 0.51 |
| C359 |
| + | 6.08 | 0.00 | 10.84 |
| C782 |
| + | 5.81 | 0.10 | 10.41 |
| C136 | NAG1 | − | 3.97 | 7.10 | 0.06 |
| C903 |
| + | 3.95 | 0.65 | 7.70 |
| C692 |
| + | 3.66 | 0.13 | 6.61 |
| C487 | “ | − | 3.62 | 6.46 | 0.42 |
Difference between natural sediment and enrichment populations. +, OTU has greater representation in enrichment samples than natural samples. −, OTU has lower representation in enrichment samples than natural samples.
Percent contribution to community composition difference.
Average percent representation in natural sediment communities.
Average percent representation in enrichment sample communities.
Figure 4Heatmap showing log fold enrichment of highly abundant genera and OTUs of specific interest.
Taxa are scaled vertically based on percent representation in all enrichment samples, as shown in average percent abundance key. Red, increased relative abundance over natural sediment community at same sampling site; white, no change; blue, decreased relative abundance.