Literature DB >> 29357463

Contribution of action potentials to the extracellular field potential in the nucleus laminaris of barn owl.

Paula T Kuokkanen1,2, Go Ashida3, Anna Kraemer2, Thomas McColgan1,4, Kazuo Funabiki5, Hermann Wagner6, Christine Köppl3, Catherine E Carr2, Richard Kempter1,4,7.   

Abstract

Extracellular field potentials (EFP) are widely used to evaluate in vivo neural activity, but identification of multiple sources and their relative contributions is often ambiguous, making the interpretation of the EFP difficult. We have therefore analyzed a model EFP from a simple brainstem circuit with separable pre- and postsynaptic components to determine whether we could isolate its sources. Our previous papers had shown that the barn owl neurophonic largely originates with spikes from input axons and synapses that terminate on the neurons in the nucleus laminaris (NL) (Kuokkanen PT, Wagner H, Ashida G, Carr CE, Kempter R. J Neurophysiol 104: 2274-2290, 2010; Kuokkanen PT, Ashida G, Carr CE, Wagner H, Kempter R. J Neurophysiol 110: 117-130, 2013; McColgan T, Liu J, Kuokkanen PT, Carr CE, Wagner H, Kempter R. eLife 6: e26106, 2017). To determine how much the postsynaptic NL neurons contributed to the neurophonic, we recorded EFP responses in NL in vivo. Power spectral analyses showed that a small spectral component of the evoked response, between 200 and 700 Hz, could be attributed to the NL neurons' spikes, while nucleus magnocellularis (NM) spikes dominate the EFP at frequencies ≳1 kHz. Thus, spikes of NL neurons and NM axons contribute to the EFP in NL in distinct frequency bands. We conclude that if the spectral components of source types are different and if their activities can be selectively modulated, the identification of EFP sources is possible. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Extracellular field potentials (EFPs) generate clinically important signals, but their sources are incompletely understood. As a model, we have analyzed the auditory neurophonic in the barn owl's nucleus laminaris. There the EFP originates predominantly from spiking in the afferent axons, with spectral power ≳1 kHz, while postsynaptic laminaris neurons contribute little. In conclusion, the identification of EFP sources is possible if they have different spectral components and if their activities can be modulated selectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action potential; auditory coincidence detector; extracellular field potential; local field potential; neurophonic

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29357463      PMCID: PMC5966727          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00175.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  67 in total

1.  Odorant-induced olfactory receptor neural oscillations and their modulation of olfactory bulbar responses in the channel catfish.

Authors:  Alexander A Nikonov; James M Parker; John Caprio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Microsecond precision of phase delay in the auditory system of the barn owl.

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Passive soma facilitates submillisecond coincidence detection in the owl's auditory system.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Kousuke Abe; Kazuo Funabiki; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Tolerance to sound intensity of binaural coincidence detection in the nucleus laminaris of the owl.

Authors:  J L Peña; S Viete; Y Albeck; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Signal-to-noise ratio in the membrane potential of the owl's auditory coincidence detectors.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Kazuo Funabiki; Paula T Kuokkanen; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A functional circuit model of interaural time difference processing.

Authors:  Thomas McColgan; Sahil Shah; Christine Köppl; Catherine Carr; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The spiking component of oscillatory extracellular potentials in the rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Erik W Schomburg; Costas A Anastassiou; György Buzsáki; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Spatial spread of the local field potential and its laminar variation in visual cortex.

Authors:  Dajun Xing; Chun-I Yeh; Robert M Shapley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Theoretical foundations of the sound analog membrane potential that underlies coincidence detection in the barn owl.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Kazuo Funabiki; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.380

View more
  5 in total

1.  Neural Maps of Interaural Time Difference in the American Alligator: A Stable Feature in Modern Archosaurs.

Authors:  Lutz Kettler; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Auditory brainstem response wave III is correlated with extracellular field potentials from nucleus laminaris of the barn owl.

Authors:  Paula T Kuokkanen; Anna Kraemer; Richard Kempter; Christine Köppl; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Acta Acust United Acust       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Active Dendrites and Local Field Potentials: Biophysical Mechanisms and Computational Explorations.

Authors:  Manisha Sinha; Rishikesh Narayanan
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Ephaptic coupling in white matter fibre bundles modulates axonal transmission delays.

Authors:  Helmut Schmidt; Gerald Hahn; Gustavo Deco; Thomas R Knösche
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Neural timing of stimulus events with microsecond precision.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Silvio Macias; Torbjørn V Ness; Gaute T Einevoll; Kechen Zhang; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 8.029

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.