Literature DB >> 25164666

A model of the medial superior olive explains spatiotemporal features of local field potentials.

Joshua H Goldwyn1, Myles Mc Laughlin2, Eric Verschooten2, Philip X Joris2, John Rinzel3.   

Abstract

Local field potentials are important indicators of in vivo neural activity. Sustained, phase-locked, sound-evoked extracellular fields in the mammalian auditory brainstem, known as the auditory neurophonic, reflect the activity of neurons in the medial superior olive (MSO). We develop a biophysically based model of the neurophonic that accounts for features of in vivo extracellular recordings in the cat auditory brainstem. By making plausible idealizations regarding the spatial symmetry of MSO neurons and the temporal synchrony of their afferent inputs, we reduce the challenging problem of computing extracellular potentials in a 3D volume conductor to a one-dimensional problem. We find that postsynaptic currents in bipolar MSO neuron models generate extracellular voltage responses that strikingly resemble in vivo recordings. Simulations reproduce distinctive spatiotemporal features of the in vivo neurophonic response to monaural pure tones: large oscillations (hundreds of microvolts to millivolts), broad spatial reach (millimeter scale), and a dipole-like spatial profile. We also explain how somatic inhibition and the relative timing of bilateral excitation may shape the spatial profile of the neurophonic. We observe in simulations, and find supporting evidence in in vivo data, that coincident excitatory inputs on both dendrites lead to a drastically reduced spatial reach of the neurophonic. This outcome surprises because coincident inputs are thought to evoke maximal firing rates in MSO neurons, and it reconciles previously puzzling evoked potential results in humans and animals. The success of our model, which has no axon or spike-generating sodium currents, suggests that MSO spikes do not contribute appreciably to the neurophonic.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/3411705-18$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory brainstem; computer model; local field potential; medial superior olive; neurophonic

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25164666      PMCID: PMC4145174          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0175-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  64 in total

1.  Electrical interactions via the extracellular potential near cell bodies.

Authors:  G R Holt; C Koch
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Microelectrode study of superior olivary nuclei.

Authors:  R GALAMBOS; J SCHWARTZKOPFF; A RUPERT
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1959-09

3.  Oscillatory dipoles as a source of phase shifts in field potentials in the mammalian auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Myles Mc Laughlin; Eric Verschooten; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Electrophysiology of a dendritic neuron model.

Authors:  W RALL
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Field potentials in the cat medial superior olivary nucleus.

Authors:  G M Clark; C W Dunlop
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. II. Responses in the tuning curve tail.

Authors:  P X Joris; P H Smith; T C Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A biophysically detailed model of neocortical local field potentials predicts the critical role of active membrane currents.

Authors:  Michael W Reimann; Costas A Anastassiou; Rodrigo Perin; Sean L Hill; Henry Markram; Christof Koch
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Neural map of interaural phase difference in the owl's brainstem.

Authors:  W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Asymmetric excitatory synaptic dynamics underlie interaural time difference processing in the auditory system.

Authors:  Pablo E Jercog; Gytis Svirskis; Vibhakar C Kotak; Dan H Sanes; John Rinzel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Tonotopic organization of the hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih) in the mammalian medial superior olive.

Authors:  Veronika J Baumann; Simon Lehnert; Christian Leibold; Ursula Koch
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.492

View more
  9 in total

1.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Neuronal coupling by endogenous electric fields: cable theory and applications to coincidence detector neurons in the auditory brain stem.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; John Rinzel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The Calyx of Held: A Hypothesis on the Need for Reliable Timing in an Intensity-Difference Encoder.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Laurence O Trussell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Neural Maps of Interaural Time Difference in the American Alligator: A Stable Feature in Modern Archosaurs.

Authors:  Lutz Kettler; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Sarah L Hodgson; Mary Ellen Scherer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-28

6.  Contribution of action potentials to the extracellular field potential in the nucleus laminaris of barn owl.

Authors:  Paula T Kuokkanen; Go Ashida; Anna Kraemer; Thomas McColgan; Kazuo Funabiki; Hermann Wagner; Christine Köppl; Catherine E Carr; Richard Kempter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The Binaural Interaction Component in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Presents few Differences to Mammalian Data.

Authors:  Nicolas Palanca-Castan; Geneviève Laumen; Darrin Reed; Christine Köppl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-25

8.  Dipolar extracellular potentials generated by axonal projections.

Authors:  Thomas McColgan; Ji Liu; Paula Tuulia Kuokkanen; Catherine Emily Carr; Hermann Wagner; Richard Kempter
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Change in the coding of interaural time difference along the tonotopic axis of the chicken nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Nicolas Palanca-Castan; Christine Köppl
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.492

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.