Literature DB >> 23548103

Wintertime factors affecting contaminant distribution in a swine farrowing room.

Kelsie A Reeve1, Thomas M Peters, T Renée Anthony.   

Abstract

An estimated 200,000 to 500,000 U.S. workers in concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are at risk of adverse respiratory outcomes from exposures to indoor contaminants. In the wintertime, general ventilation is minimized in the Midwest due to high heating costs required to maintain indoor temperatures optimal for animal production. Pit fans typically operate to exhaust under-floor manure pits, but little other fresh air intake exists. Many operators believe that these systems are sufficient to reduce contaminant concentrations within the building during winter. Investigating whether these pit fans provide sufficient protection against classic CAFO contaminants during minimal wintertime ventilation was warranted. Direct-reading instruments were used to measure and record concentrations of multiple contaminants using both fixed-area and mobile contaminant mapping in a farrowing room during a Midwest winter. With the exception of CO, concentrations were significantly (p<0.001) higher with the pit fan off compared with those with the pit fan on. Additional analyses identified that significant changes (p<0.001) in mean room concentrations of respirable dust (decreased, 77% with pit fan off and 87% with pit fan on) and CO2 (increased, 24%) over the 5-hr study periods and that multiple fixed-area monitors rather than the much-used, single center-of-room monitor provided a more conservative (e.g., protective) assessment of room concentrations. While concentrations did not exceed occupational exposure limits from OSHA or ACGIH for individual contaminants, recommended agricultural health limits from exposure-response studies suggested in the literature were exceeded for respirable dust, CO2, and NH3, indicating a need to consider personal exposures and control options to reduce contaminant concentrations in farrowing rooms. Pit fans reduced NH3 and H2S concentrations, but these fans may not be sufficient to control dust and eliminate the need for secondary exposure prevention methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23548103      PMCID: PMC4753562          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2013.777303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  11 in total

1.  Influence of building maintenance, environmental factors, and seasons on airborne contaminants of swine confinement buildings.

Authors:  C Duchaine; Y Grimard; Y Cormier
Journal:  AIHAJ       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

2.  Working in swine-confinement buildings causes an accelerated decline in FEV1: a 7-yr follow-up of Danish farmers.

Authors:  M Iversen; R Dahl
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  A task-specific assessment of Swine worker exposure to airborne dust.

Authors:  Patrick T O'Shaughnessy; Kelley J Donham; Thomas M Peters; Craig Taylor; Ralph Altmaier; Kevin M Kelly
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Alterations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid but not in lung function and bronchial responsiveness in swine confinement workers.

Authors:  K Larsson; A Eklund; P Malmberg; L Belin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Distribution of particle and gas concentrations in Swine gestation confined animal feeding operations.

Authors:  Thomas M Peters; T Renée Anthony; Craig Taylor; Ralph Altmaier; Kimberley Anderson; Patrick T O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-08-16

6.  Respiratory health of workers exposed to swine confinement buildings only or to both swine confinement buildings and dairy barns.

Authors:  Y Cormier; L P Boulet; G Bedard; G Tremblay
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Environmental and health studies of farm workers in Swedish swine confinement buildings.

Authors:  K Donham; P Haglind; Y Peterson; R Rylander; L Belin
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1989-01

8.  Temporal variation of indoor air quality in an enclosed swine confinement building.

Authors:  P T O'Shaughnessy; C Achutan; A W Karsten
Journal:  J Agric Saf Health       Date:  2002-11

9.  Ambient levels of selected gases inside swine confinement buildings.

Authors:  K J Donham; W J Popendorf
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1985-11

10.  Respiratory dysfunction in swine production facility workers: dose-response relationships of environmental exposures and pulmonary function.

Authors:  K J Donham; S J Reynolds; P Whitten; J A Merchant; L Burmeister; W J Popendorf
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.214

View more
  7 in total

1.  Simulation of air quality and operational cost to ventilate swine farrowing facilities in Midwest U.S. during winter.

Authors:  Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters; Ralph Altmaier; Samuel M Jones; Richard Gassman; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  Trans ASABE       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.188

2.  Assessment of Interventions to Improve Air Quality in a Livestock Building.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Anthony Y Yang; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Agric Saf Health       Date:  2017-11-20

3.  Evaluation of Low-Cost Hydrogen Sulfide Monitors for Use in Livestock Production.

Authors:  Jessica M Beswick-Honn; Thomas M Peters; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  J Agric Saf Health       Date:  2017-11-20

4.  Modeled effectiveness of ventilation with contaminant control devices on indoor air quality in a swine farrowing facility.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Ralph Altmaier; Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Simulation of air quality and cost to ventilate swine farrowing facilities in winter.

Authors:  Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters; Ralph Altmaier; Russell A Sawvel; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  Comput Electron Agric       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 5.565

6.  Use of Recirculating Ventilation With Dust Filtration to Improve Wintertime Air Quality in a Swine Farrowing Room.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Ralph Altmaier; Samuel Jones; Rich Gassman; Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Effects of elevated CO2 levels on lung immune response to organic dust and lipopolysaccharide.

Authors:  David Schneberger; Upkardeep Pandher; Brooke Thompson; Shelley Kirychuk
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2021-04-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.