Literature DB >> 26937062

Simulation of air quality and cost to ventilate swine farrowing facilities in winter.

Jae Hong Park1, Thomas M Peters1, Ralph Altmaier1, Russell A Sawvel1, T Renée Anthony1.   

Abstract

We developed a simulation model to study the effect of ventilation airflow rate with and without filtered recirculation on airborne contaminant concentrations (dust, NH3, CO, and CO2) for swine farrowing facilities. Energy and mass balance equations were used to simulate the indoor air quality and operational cost for a variety of ventilation conditions over a 3-month winter period, using time-varied outdoor temperature. The sensitivity of input and output parameters on indoor air quality and operational cost were evaluated. Significant factors affecting model output included mean winter temperature, generation rate of contaminants, pit-air-exchange ratio, and recirculation ratio. As mean outdoor temperature was decreased from -2.5 °C to -12.5 °C, total operational costs were increased from $872 to $1304. Dust generation rate affected dust concentrations linearly. When dust generation rates changed -50% and +100% from baseline, indoor dust concentrations were changed -50% and +100%, respectively. The selection of a pit-air-exchange ratio was found critical to NH3 concentration, but has little impact on other contaminants or cost. As the pit-air-exchange ratio was increased from 0.1 to 0.3, the NH3 concentration was increased by a factor of 1.5. The recirculation ratio affected both IAQ factors and total operational cost. As the recirculation ratio decreased to 0, inhalable and respirable dust concentrations, humidity, NH3 and CO2 concentrations decreased and total operational cost ($2216) was 104% more than with pit-fan-only ventilation ($1088). When the recirculation ratio was 1, the total operational cost was increased by $573 (53%) compared to pit-fan-only. Simulation provides a useful tool for examining the costs and benefits to installing common ventilation technology to CAFO and, ultimately, making sound management decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air quality; Ammonia; Dust; Simulation; Simulink; Swine farrowing facility

Year:  2013        PMID: 26937062      PMCID: PMC4770838          DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2013.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Electron Agric        ISSN: 0168-1699            Impact factor:   5.565


  18 in total

1.  Synergistic effects of dust and ammonia on the occupational health effects of poultry production workers.

Authors:  Kelley J Donham; Debra Cumro; Steve Reynolds
Journal:  J Agromedicine       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.675

2.  Effects of atmospheric ammonia on the pig.

Authors:  D P Stombaugh; H S Teague; W L Roller
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Wintertime factors affecting contaminant distribution in a swine farrowing room.

Authors:  Kelsie A Reeve; Thomas M Peters; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  Human health effects of dust exposure in animal confinement buildings.

Authors:  M Iversen; S Kirychuk; H Drost; L Jacobson
Journal:  J Agric Saf Health       Date:  2000-11

5.  Exposure assessment to airborne endotoxin, dust, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in open style swine houses.

Authors:  C W Chang; H Chung; C F Huang; H J Su
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2001-08

6.  Monitoring airborne biotic contaminants in the indoor environment of pig and poultry confinement buildings.

Authors:  Pei-Ying Hong; Xiangzhen Li; Xufei Yang; Takumi Shinkai; Yuanhui Zhang; Xinlei Wang; Roderick I Mackie
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.491

7.  Distribution of particle and gas concentrations in Swine gestation confined animal feeding operations.

Authors:  Thomas M Peters; T Renée Anthony; Craig Taylor; Ralph Altmaier; Kimberley Anderson; Patrick T O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-08-16

8.  Association of environmental air contaminants with disease and productivity in swine.

Authors:  K J Donham
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.156

9.  Respiratory dysfunction in swine production facility workers: dose-response relationships of environmental exposures and pulmonary function.

Authors:  K J Donham; S J Reynolds; P Whitten; J A Merchant; L Burmeister; W J Popendorf
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Multiple exposures to swine barn air induce lung inflammation and airway hyper-responsiveness.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar Charavaryamath; Kyathanahalli S Janardhan; Hugh G Townsend; Philip Willson; Baljit Singh
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2005-06-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Simulation of air quality and operational cost to ventilate swine farrowing facilities in Midwest U.S. during winter.

Authors:  Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters; Ralph Altmaier; Samuel M Jones; Richard Gassman; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  Trans ASABE       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.188

2.  Assessment of Interventions to Improve Air Quality in a Livestock Building.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Anthony Y Yang; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Agric Saf Health       Date:  2017-11-20

3.  Pre-exposure to hydrogen sulfide modulates the innate inflammatory response to organic dust.

Authors:  Denusha Shrestha; Sanjana Mahadev Bhat; Nyzil Massey; Cristina Santana Maldonado; Wilson K Rumbeiha; Chandrashekhar Charavaryamath
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.249

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.