Literature DB >> 29140643

Assessment of Interventions to Improve Air Quality in a Livestock Building.

T Renée Anthony1, Anthony Y Yang1, Thomas M Peters1.   

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of engineering controls to reduce contaminant concentrations in a swine farrowing room during winter in the U.S. Midwest. Over two winters, changes in air quality were evaluated following installation of a 1700 m3 h-1 (1000 cfm) recirculating ventilation system to provide 5.4 air exchanges per hour. This system incorporated one of two readily available dust control systems, one based on filtration and the other on cyclonic treatment. A second treatment evaluated reductions in carbon dioxide (CO2) associated with replacement of standard, unvented gas-fired heaters with new vented heaters, installed between the two winter test periods. The concentrations of carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide were negligible in the test room. Although concentrations of ammonia increased over each winter test period, the increase was unrelated to increased air movement from the new recirculating ventilation system. The dust concentrations were significantly reduced by the ventilation system for both inhalable dust (23% to 44% with filtration, 33% with cyclone) and respirable dust (32% with filtration, 20% with cyclone), significant (p 0.024) for all except respirable dust using the cyclone (p = 0.141). The filtration unit is recommended to improve livestock building air quality because it was more effective than the cyclone unit at reducing respirable dust. Carbon dioxide concentrations were significantly lower with vented heaters (mean = 1400 ppm, SD = 330 ppm) compared to unvented heaters (mean = 2480 ppm, SD = 160 ppm). A 940 ppm reduction in CO2 was attributed to the use of the vented heater, after accounting for differences in outdoor temperatures and animal housing over both test periods. The benefits of readily available technology to significantly reduce concentrations of dust and CO2 demonstrates useful control options to improve air quality in swine buildings. Copyright© by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal feeding operation; Carbon dioxide; Dust control; Gas-fired heater; Indoor air quality; Ventilation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29140643      PMCID: PMC5704995          DOI: 10.13031/jash.12426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Saf Health        ISSN: 1074-7583


  21 in total

1.  Simulation of air quality and operational cost to ventilate swine farrowing facilities in Midwest U.S. during winter.

Authors:  Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters; Ralph Altmaier; Samuel M Jones; Richard Gassman; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  Trans ASABE       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.188

2.  Working in swine-confinement buildings causes an accelerated decline in FEV1: a 7-yr follow-up of Danish farmers.

Authors:  M Iversen; R Dahl
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  Longitudinal evaluation of dose-response relationships for environmental exposures and pulmonary function in swine production workers.

Authors:  S J Reynolds; K J Donham; P Whitten; J A Merchant; L F Burmeister; W J Popendorf
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Longitudinal changes in bronchial responsiveness associated with swine confinement dust exposure.

Authors:  P F Vogelzang; J W van der Gulden; H Folgering; D Heederik; M J Tielen; C P van Schayck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Evaluation of a Shaker Dust Collector for Use in a Recirculating Ventilation System.

Authors:  Thomas M Peters; Russell A Sawvel; Jae Hong Park; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Modeled effectiveness of ventilation with contaminant control devices on indoor air quality in a swine farrowing facility.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Ralph Altmaier; Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Diurnal odor, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and carbon dioxide emission profiles of confined swine grower/finisher rooms.

Authors:  Gang Sun; Huiqing Guo; Jonathan Peterson; Bernardo Predicala; Claude Laguë
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.235

8.  Pig farmers have signs of bronchial inflammation and increased numbers of lymphocytes and neutrophils in BAL fluid.

Authors:  B Pedersen; M Iversen; B Bundgaard Larsen; R Dahl
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  Respiratory dysfunction in swine production facility workers: dose-response relationships of environmental exposures and pulmonary function.

Authors:  K J Donham; S J Reynolds; P Whitten; J A Merchant; L Burmeister; W J Popendorf
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Is CO2 an indoor pollutant? Direct effects of low-to-moderate CO2 concentrations on human decision-making performance.

Authors:  Usha Satish; Mark J Mendell; Krishnamurthy Shekhar; Toshifumi Hotchi; Douglas Sullivan; Siegfried Streufert; William J Fisk
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.