Literature DB >> 10772615

Influence of building maintenance, environmental factors, and seasons on airborne contaminants of swine confinement buildings.

C Duchaine1, Y Grimard, Y Cormier.   

Abstract

Eight swine confinement buildings, selected to cover the widest possible range of cleanliness, were visited twice during winter and once during summer to verify the range, seasonal variations, and correlations between biological and chemical contaminants. Physical aspects were graded for dirtiness (1 = clean, 10 = dirty), ventilation, air temperature, number of animals, building, and room size. Air samples were taken to measure relative humidity, CO2, ammonia, total dust, and microbiological counts and/or identification (bacteria and molds); endotoxin levels also were measured. During winter, average measurements and ranges were: CO2 = 0.304% (0.254 to 0.349%); ammonia = 19.6 ppm (1.9 to 25.9 ppm); dust = 3.54 mg/m3 (2.15 to 5.60 mg/m3). There were 883 cfu/m3 (547 to 2862 cfu/m3) of molds, 4.25 x 10(5) cfu/m3 (1.67 x 10(5) to 9.30 x 10(5) cfu/m3) of total bacteria, 29 cfu/m3 (3 to 94 cfu/m3) of thermophilic actinomycetes). A significant decrease in bacterial levels (p = 0.04), dust (p = 0.0008), ammonia (p = 0.005), and CO2 (p < 0.0001) was observed during summer sampling when compared with winter levels. Mold counts were positively correlated (p = 0.03) with dirtiness scores, while bacterial counts were negatively correlated with this parameter (p < 0.002), whereas bacteria and endotoxins were correlated with the number of animals (p < 0.05). Ambient gases (CO2 and ammonia) correlated with each other (p = 0.006). Bacteria were the most important contaminant in swine confinement buildings, and endotoxin levels found were also very high (mean = 4.9 x 10(3) EU/m3). We conclude that a wide range of air contamination exists in swine confinement buildings of different maintenance. There is a decrease in some of these contaminants during summer. Observed dirtiness of the swine confinement buildings has a poor predictive value concerning air quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10772615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIHAJ        ISSN: 1529-8663


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of endotoxin exposure assessment by bioaerosol impinger and filter-sampling methods.

Authors:  C Duchaine; P S Thorne; A Mériaux; Y Grimard; P Whitten; Y Cormier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  A comprehensive review of levels and determinants of personal exposure to dust and endotoxin in livestock farming.

Authors:  Ioannis Basinas; Torben Sigsgaard; Hans Kromhout; Dick Heederik; Inge M Wouters; Vivi Schlünssen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 3.  Methods for sampling of airborne viruses.

Authors:  Daniel Verreault; Sylvain Moineau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Culture-independent characterization of archaeal biodiversity in swine confinement building bioaerosols.

Authors:  Benjamin Nehmé; Yan Gilbert; Valérie Létourneau; Robert J Forster; Marc Veillette; Richard Villemur; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Detection of Streptococcus suis in bioaerosols of swine confinement buildings.

Authors:  Laetitia Bonifait; Marc Veillette; Valérie Létourneau; Daniel Grenier; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Wintertime factors affecting contaminant distribution in a swine farrowing room.

Authors:  Kelsie A Reeve; Thomas M Peters; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Use of Recirculating Ventilation With Dust Filtration to Improve Wintertime Air Quality in a Swine Farrowing Room.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Ralph Altmaier; Samuel Jones; Rich Gassman; Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Self-reported work activities, eye, nose, and throat symptoms, and respiratory health outcomes among an industrial hog operation worker cohort, North Carolina, USA.

Authors:  Vanessa R Coffman; Devon J Hall; Nora Pisanic; David C Love; Maya Nadimpalli; Meredith McCormack; Marie Diener-West; Meghan F Davis; Christopher D Heaney
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.079

9.  Multiple exposures to swine barn air induce lung inflammation and airway hyper-responsiveness.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar Charavaryamath; Kyathanahalli S Janardhan; Hugh G Townsend; Philip Willson; Baljit Singh
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2005-06-02

10.  Cohort profile: the Saskatchewan Rural Health Study-adult component.

Authors:  Punam Pahwa; Masud Rana; William Pickett; Chandima P Karunanayake; Khalid Amin; Niels Koehncke; Valerie Elliot; Louise Hagel; Josh Lawson; Donna Rennie; Shelley Kirychuk; Bonnie Janzen; Roland Dyck; James Dosman
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.