Literature DB >> 23541911

A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Samira Anderson1, Travis White-Schwoch, Alexandra Parbery-Clark, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

Understanding speech in noise is one of the most complex activities encountered in everyday life, relying on peripheral hearing, central auditory processing, and cognition. These abilities decline with age, and so older adults are often frustrated by a reduced ability to communicate effectively in noisy environments. Many studies have examined these factors independently; in the last decade, however, the idea of an auditory-cognitive system has emerged, recognizing the need to consider the processing of complex sounds in the context of dynamic neural circuits. Here, we used structural equation modeling to evaluate the interacting contributions of peripheral hearing, central processing, cognitive ability, and life experiences to understanding speech in noise. We recruited 120 older adults (ages 55-79) and evaluated their peripheral hearing status, cognitive skills, and central processing. We also collected demographic measures of life experiences, such as physical activity, intellectual engagement, and musical training. In our model, central processing and cognitive function predicted a significant proportion of variance in the ability to understand speech in noise. To a lesser extent, life experience predicted hearing-in-noise ability through modulation of brainstem function. Peripheral hearing levels did not significantly contribute to the model. Previous musical experience modulated the relative contributions of cognitive ability and lifestyle factors to hearing in noise. Our models demonstrate the complex interactions required to hear in noise and the importance of targeting cognitive function, lifestyle, and central auditory processing in the management of individuals who are having difficulty hearing in noise.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23541911      PMCID: PMC3658829          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  131 in total

1.  Paired-tone stimuli reveal reductions and alterations in temporal processing in inferior colliculus neurons of aged animals.

Authors:  Paul G Finlayson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-02-27

2.  Aging alters the neural representation of speech cues.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Michael Piskosz; Pamela Souza
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-10-28       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 3.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Association of lifetime cognitive engagement and low β-amyloid deposition.

Authors:  Susan M Landau; Shawn M Marks; Elizabeth C Mormino; Gil D Rabinovici; Hwamee Oh; James P O'Neil; Robert S Wilson; William J Jagust
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2012-05

5.  Childhood poverty: specific associations with neurocognitive development.

Authors:  Martha J Farah; David M Shera; Jessica H Savage; Laura Betancourt; Joan M Giannetta; Nancy L Brodsky; Elsa K Malmud; Hallam Hurt
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Rachel A McArdle; Sherri L Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Neuroanatomical characteristics and speech perception in noise in older adults.

Authors:  Patrick C M Wong; Marc Ettlinger; John P Sheppard; Geshri M Gunasekera; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  The emergence of cognitive hearing science.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Thomas Lunner; Björn Lyxell; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

10.  The influence of perceptual training on working memory in older adults.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Theodore P Zanto; Wesley C Clapp; Joseph L Hardy; Peter B Delahunt; Henry W Mahncke; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  73 in total

1.  Lexical influences on competing speech perception in younger, middle-aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Compensatory and Serial Processing Models for Relating Electrophysiology, Speech Understanding, and Cognition.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Garnett P McMillan; Marilyn F Dille; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  From Notes to Vowels: Neural Correlations between Musical Training and Speech Processing.

Authors:  Iliza M Butera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Age-related hearing loss increases full-brain connectivity while reversing directed signaling within the dorsal-ventral pathway for speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Md Sultan Mahmud; Mohammed Yeasin; Dawei Shen; Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.270

5.  Functional Interplay Between the Putative Measures of Rostral and Caudal Efferent Regulation of Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Sandeep Maruthy; U Ajith Kumar; G Nike Gnanateja
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-26

6.  Adaptation to novel foreign-accented speech and retention of benefit following training: Influence of aging and hearing loss.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The Downside of Greater Lexical Influences: Selectively Poorer Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Boji P W Lam; Zilong Xie; Rachel Tessmer; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Correlations of decision weights and cognitive function for the masked discrimination of vowels by young and old adults.

Authors:  Lynn Gilbertson; Robert A Lutfi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.