Literature DB >> 25256580

Correlations of decision weights and cognitive function for the masked discrimination of vowels by young and old adults.

Lynn Gilbertson1, Robert A Lutfi2.   

Abstract

Older adults are often reported in the literature to have greater difficulty than younger adults understanding speech in noise [Helfer and Wilber (1988). J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 859-893]. The poorer performance of older adults has been attributed to a general deterioration of cognitive processing, deterioration of cochlear anatomy, and/or greater difficulty segregating speech from noise. The current work used perturbation analysis [Berg (1990). J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 149-158] to provide a more specific assessment of the effect of cognitive factors on speech perception in noise. Sixteen older (age 56-79 years) and seventeen younger (age 19-30 years) adults discriminated a target vowel masked by randomly selected masker vowels immediately preceding and following the target. Relative decision weights on target and maskers resulting from the analysis revealed large individual differences across participants despite similar performance scores in many cases. On the most difficult vowel discriminations, the older adult decision weights were significantly correlated with inhibitory control (Color Word Interference test) and pure-tone threshold averages (PTA). Young adult decision weights were not correlated with any measures of peripheral (PTA) or central function (inhibition or working memory).
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25256580      PMCID: PMC4253306          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  31 in total

1.  Age differences in successive responses to simultaneous stimulation.

Authors:  J INGLIS; W K CAIRD
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1963-03

2.  Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Peter S Chang; Brian D Simpson; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Aging and speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Observer efficiency and weights in a multiple observation task.

Authors:  B G Berg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II: Multivariate analyses.

Authors:  J C van Rooij; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Tune in or tune out: age-related differences in listening to speech in music.

Authors:  Frank A Russo; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers.

Authors:  D H Klatt; L C Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.

Authors:  M K Pichora-Fuller; B A Schneider; M Daneman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A formant bandwidth estimation procedure for vowel synthesis [43.72.Ja].

Authors:  J W Hawks; J D Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly.

Authors:  L E Humes; B U Watson; L A Christensen; C G Cokely; D C Halling; L Lee
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Estimates of decision weights and internal noise in the masked discrimination of vowels by young and elderly adults.

Authors:  Lynn Gilbertson; Robert A Lutfi; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee; Torben Pastore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise.

Authors:  Léo Varnet; Chloé Langlet; Christian Lorenzi; Diane S Lazard; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.