Literature DB >> 30374212

Electric and Acoustic Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Hearing Preservation.

Christopher Welch1, Margaret T Dillon1, Harold C Pillsbury1.   

Abstract

Hearing loss affects 30 million people in the United States, and a subset of these patients have normal low-frequency hearing and ski-sloped high-frequency hearing loss. For these patients, hearing aids alone may not provide adequate benefit. Cochlear implantation alone has been utilized to improve speech perception. The addition of high-frequency electric hearing to low-frequency acoustic hearing in these patients is beneficial. Technical improvements have allowed preservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implant recipients, allowing for electric and acoustic stimulation in the same ear with significant improvements in speech perception, sound localization, music appreciation, and quality of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implantation; electric and acoustic stimulation; hearing loss; hearing preservation cochlear implantation

Year:  2018        PMID: 30374212      PMCID: PMC6203459          DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1670707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hear        ISSN: 0734-0451


  125 in total

1.  Sound medicine.

Authors:  Elie Dolgin
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  L A J Reiss; C W Turner; S A Karsten; B J Gantz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Oxidative stress and apoptosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pathophysiology       Date:  2000-09

4.  Long-term results of hearing preservation cochlear implant surgery in patients with residual low frequency hearing.

Authors:  Hideaki Moteki; Shin-Ya Nishio; Maiko Miyagawa; Keita Tsukada; Satoshi Iwasaki; Shin-Ichi Usami
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 5.  A systematic review of electric-acoustic stimulation: device fitting ranges, outcomes, and clinical fitting practices.

Authors:  Paola V Incerti; Teresa Y C Ching; Robert Cowan
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-03

6.  Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stover; Andreas Buechner; Gerrit Paasche; Robert Briggs; Frank Risi; Joerg Pesch; Rolf-Dieter Battmer
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Insertion depth impacts speech perception and hearing preservation for lateral wall electrodes.

Authors:  Brendan P O'Connell; Jacob B Hunter; David S Haynes; Jourdan T Holder; Matt M Dedmon; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; George B Wanna
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Contribution of bimodal hearing to lexical tone normalization in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Yi-Ping Chang; Chun-Yi Lin; Ronald Y Chang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Intracochlear drug delivery in combination with cochlear implants : Current aspects.

Authors:  S K Plontke; G Götze; T Rahne; A Liebau
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  United States multicenter clinical trial of the cochlear nucleus hybrid implant system.

Authors:  J Thomas Roland; Bruce J Gantz; Susan B Waltzman; Aaron J Parkinson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  1 in total

1.  Immune Response After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Edi Simoni; Erica Gentilin; Mariarita Candito; Giulia Borile; Filippo Romanato; Milvia Chicca; Sara Nordio; Marta Aspidistria; Alessandro Martini; Diego Cazzador; Laura Astolfi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.