Literature DB >> 23519308

Follow-up testing after colposcopy: five-year risk of CIN 2+ after a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN 1 or less.

Hormuzd A Katki1, Julia C Gage, Mark Schiffman, Philip E Castle, Barbara Fetterman, Nancy E Poitras, Thomas Lorey, Li C Cheung, Tina Raine-Bennett, Walter K Kinney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Most women referred for colposcopy are not diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN 2+) but, nonetheless, are typically asked to return much sooner than their next routine screening interval in 3 to 5 years. An important question is how many subsequent negative Pap results, or negative Pap and human papillomavirus (HPV) cotest results, are needed before returning to an extended retesting interval.
METHODS: We estimated 5-year risks of CIN 2+ for 3 follow-up management strategies after colposcopy (Pap-alone, HPV-alone, and cotesting) for 20,319 women aged 25 years and older screened from 2003 to 2010 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California who were referred for colposcopy but for whom CIN 2+ was not initially diagnosed (i.e., "women with CIN 1/negative colposcopy").
RESULTS: Screening results immediately antecedent to CIN 1/negative colposcopy influenced subsequent 5-year CIN 2+ risk: women with an antecedent HPV-positive/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Pap had a lower risk (10%) than those with antecedent atypical squamous cells cannot rule out HSIL (ASC-H; 16%, p < .0001) or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (HSIL+; 24%, p < .0001). For women with an antecedent HPV-positive/ASC-US or LSIL, a single negative cotest approximately 1 year after colposcopy predicted lower subsequent 5-year risk of CIN 2+ (1.1%) than 2 sequential negative HPV tests (1.8%, p = .3) or 2 sequential negative Pap results (4.0%, p < .0001). For those with an antecedent ASC-H or HSIL+ Pap, 1 negative cotest 1 year after colposcopy predicted lower subsequent 5-year risk of CIN 2+ (2.2%) than 1 negative HPV test (4.4%, p = .4) or 1 negative Pap (7.0%, p = .06); insufficient data existed to calculate the risk after sequential negative cotests for women with high-grade antecedent cytology.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with a CIN 1/negative colposcopy followed by negative postcolposcopy tests did not achieve sufficiently low CIN 2+ risk to return to 5-year routine screening. For women with antecedent HPV-positive/ASC-US or LSIL, a single negative postcolposcopy cotest reduced their risk to a level consistent with a 3-year return. For women with antecedent ASC-H or HSIL+, no single negative test result sufficed to reduce their risk to a level consistent with a 3-year return.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23519308      PMCID: PMC3616505          DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31828543b1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  11 in total

1.  Benchmarking CIN 3+ risk as the basis for incorporating HPV and Pap cotesting into cervical screening and management guidelines.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Julia C Gage; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).

Authors:  Joan L Walker; Sophia S Wang; Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review.

Authors:  A G Ostör
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.762

4.  Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna M Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers; David Chelmow; Abbe Herzig; Jane J Kim; Walter Kinney; W Lawson Herschel; Jeffrey Waldman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 6.  The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology.

Authors:  Diane Solomon; Diane Davey; Robert Kurman; Ann Moriarty; Dennis O'Connor; Marianne Prey; Stephen Raab; Mark Sherman; David Wilbur; Thomas Wright; Nancy Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Thomas C Wright; L Stewart Massad; Charles J Dunton; Mark Spitzer; Edward J Wilkinson; Diane Solomon
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Natural history of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Melnikow; J Nuovo; A R Willan; B K Chan; L P Howell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.

Authors:  J Thomas Cox; Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Five-year risks of CIN 3+ and cervical cancer among women with HPV-positive and HPV-negative high-grade Pap results.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Julia C Gage; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

View more
  14 in total

1.  A Suggested Approach to Simplify and Improve Cervical Screening in the United States.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Clinical application of DNA ploidy to cervical cancer screening: A review.

Authors:  David Garner
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

3.  Prognostic value of human papillomavirus 16/18 genotyping in low-grade cervical lesions preceded by mildly abnormal cytology.

Authors:  Jing Ye; Bei Cheng; Yi-Fan Cheng; Ye-Li Yao; Xing Xie; Wei-Guo Lu; Xiao-Dong Cheng
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2017 Mar.       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 4.  Hysterectomy in the Urologist's Practice.

Authors:  Steven J Weissbart; Ariana L Smith
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Reflex Human Papillomavirus Test Results as an Option for the Management of Korean Women With Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion.

Authors:  Ki-Jin Ryu; Sanghoon Lee; Kyung-Jin Min; Jae Won Kim; Jin Hwa Hong; Jae Yun Song; Jae Kwan Lee; Nak Woo Lee
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-05-11

6.  p16 staining has limited value in predicting the outcome of histological low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.

Authors:  Amaia Sagasta; Paola Castillo; Adela Saco; Aureli Torné; Roser Esteve; Lorena Marimon; Jaume Ordi; Marta Del Pino
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  hr-HPV testing in the follow-up of women with cytological abnormalities and negative colposcopy.

Authors:  F Carozzi; C B Visioli; M Confortini; A Iossa; P Mantellini; E Burroni; M Zappa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Low Risk of Cervical Cancer/Precancer Among Most Women Under Surveillance Postcolposcopy.

Authors:  Maria Demarco; Li C Cheung; Walter K Kinney; Nicolas Wentzensen; Thomas S Lorey; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Brian Befano; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Risks of CIN 2+, CIN 3+, and Cancer by Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Status: The Foundation of Risk-Based Cervical Screening Guidelines.

Authors:  Maria Demarco; Thomas S Lorey; Barbara Fetterman; Li C Cheung; Richard S Guido; Nicolas Wentzensen; Walter K Kinney; Nancy E Poitras; Brian Befano; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  MiRNA detection in cervical exfoliated cells for missed high-grade lesions in women with LSIL/CIN1 diagnosis after colposcopy-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Jing Ye; Xiao-Dong Cheng; Bei Cheng; Yi-Fan Cheng; Xiao-Jing Chen; Wei-Guo Lu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.