Literature DB >> 12824970

Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.

J Thomas Cox1, Mark Schiffman, Diane Solomon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of cumulative cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or 3 according to initial colposcopy and directed biopsy results among women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) or human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS). STUDY
DESIGN: A 2-year follow-up of 897 cases of LSIL and 1193 cases of HPV DNA positive ASCUS from the ASCUS/LSIL Triage Study was used to simulate American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Consensus Conference recommendations. Women with CIN grade 1 or less were followed up for 2 years by semiannual cytologic examination, with universal exit colposcopy. The clinical end point was a cumulative clinical center histologic diagnosis of CIN grade 2 or 3.
RESULTS: The cumulative risk of CIN grade 2 or 3 was equivalent for LSIL (27.6%) and HPV positive ASCUS (26.7%). After excluding the women with a diagnosis of CIN grade 2 or 3 at initial colposcopy and directed biopsy (17.9%), the remaining women were at nearly identical risk for subsequent CIN grade 2 or 3 regardless of initial colposcopy result (completely negative colposcopy-11.3%; negative colposcopically directed biopsy-11.7%; and CIN grade 1 biopsy-13.0%).
CONCLUSION: LSIL and HPV positive ASCUS are clinically equivalent. Initial colposcopic detection of obviously prevalent CIN grade 2 or 3 reduces risk. However, for the remaining women who have CIN grade 1 or less on colposcopy and directed biopsy, the risk for subsequent CIN grade 2 or 3 (whether missed, prevalent, or truly incident) is approximately 12% over 2 years. This risk does not vary meaningfully by initial distinction of histologic CIN grade 1 from negative colposcopy and biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12824970     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  49 in total

1.  Rate of and risks for regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Yifei Ma; Charles Wibbelsman; Teresa M Darragh; Adaleen Powers; Sepideh Farhat; Stephen Shiboski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Follow-up testing after colposcopy: five-year risk of CIN 2+ after a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN 1 or less.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Julia C Gage; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Preinvasive and Invasive Cervical Adenocarcinoma: Preceding Low-Risk or Negative Pap Result Increases Time to Diagnosis.

Authors:  Lea A Moukarzel; Ana M Angarita; Christopher VandenBussche; Anne Rositch; Carol B Thompson; Amanda N Fader; Kimberly Levinson
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Lessons from practice: risk of CIN 3 or cancer associated with an LSIL or HPV-positive ASC-US screening result in women aged 21 to 24.

Authors:  Gaea Moore; Barbara Fetterman; J Thomas Cox; Nancy Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Walter Kinney; Philip E Castle
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Subsequent risks for cervical precancer and cancer in women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions unconfirmed by colposcopy-directed biopsy: results from a multicenter, prospective, cohort study.

Authors:  Koji Matsumoto; Yasuo Hirai; Reiko Furuta; Naoyoshi Takatsuka; Akinori Oki; Toshiharu Yasugi; Hiroo Maeda; Akira Mitsuhashi; Takuma Fujii; Kei Kawana; Tsuyoshi Iwasaka; Nobuo Yaegashi; Yoh Watanabe; Yutaka Nagai; Tomoyuki Kitagawa; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Early cervical neoplasia: advances in screening and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Brent Tierney; Shannon N Westin; Matthew P Schlumbrecht; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-08

7.  Accuracy of cervical specimens obtained for biomarker studies in women with CIN3.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Rosemary E Zuna; Mark E Sherman; Michael A Gold; Mark Schiffman; S Terence Dunn; Jose Jeronimo; Roy Zhang; Joan Walker; Sophia S Wang
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Cancer registries and monitoring the impact of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccines: the potential role.

Authors:  Mona Saraiya; Marc T Goodman; S Deblina Datta; Vivien W Chen; Phyllis A Wingo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Biopsy and selective recall compared with immediate large loop excision in management of women with low grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

10.  An updated natural history model of cervical cancer: derivation of model parameters.

Authors:  Nicole G Campos; Emily A Burger; Stephen Sy; Monisha Sharma; Mark Schiffman; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Allan Hildesheim; Rolando Herrero; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.