Literature DB >> 16890545

Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).

Joan L Walker1, Sophia S Wang, Mark Schiffman, Diane Solomon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: At present, clinical management of women referred to colposcopy but found to have <CIN2 remains unclear. Using data from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) to inform clinical management, we calculated the absolute risk for developing CIN3 within 2 years of referral to an enrollment colposcopy. STUDY
DESIGN: Women included in the analyses: (1) were initially referred to ALTS with a community cytologic interpretation of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL); (2) had a colposcopic evaluation and biopsy, if indicated, resulting in a diagnosis <CIN2; and, therefore (3) were followed without treatment. Results from subsequent human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, liquid-based cytology interpretations, and a second colposcopic evaluation at least 6 months after and within 2 years of the first colposcopic evaluation were used to calculate absolute risks for CIN3.
RESULTS: Women with HPV-negative test results were at low risk for CIN3 regardless of other test results. Among HPV-positive women, increasing absolute risks of CIN3 were observed with increasing cytology severity: 7% (normal), 11% (ASCUS and LSIL), and 45% (HSIL). The highest absolute risk for CIN3 (67%) was observed for HPV-positive women with HSIL and a colposcopic impression of high-grade/cancer on the second colposcopy.
CONCLUSION: In the ALTS population, after the first colposcopic diagnosis of <CIN2, clear risk stratification for CIN3 outcomes was obtained among women with a subsequent HPV-positive test. Because absolute risk for histologic CIN3 outcomes was high for women with HPV positive tests, HSIL cytology, and a high-grade impression at second colposcopy, it is worth considering whether this combination of findings might warrant immediate excisional therapy in some circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16890545     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.02.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  13 in total

1.  Nanobody-Antigen Conjugates Elicit HPV-Specific Antitumor Immune Responses.

Authors:  Andrew W Woodham; Ross W Cheloha; Jingjing Ling; Mohammad Rashidian; Stephen C Kolifrath; Maia Mesyngier; Joao N Duarte; Justin M Bader; Joseph G Skeate; Diane M Da Silva; W Martin Kast; Hidde L Ploegh
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 11.151

2.  Follow-up testing after colposcopy: five-year risk of CIN 2+ after a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN 1 or less.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Julia C Gage; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Lessons from practice: risk of CIN 3 or cancer associated with an LSIL or HPV-positive ASC-US screening result in women aged 21 to 24.

Authors:  Gaea Moore; Barbara Fetterman; J Thomas Cox; Nancy Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Walter Kinney; Philip E Castle
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Comparison of measurements of human papillomavirus persistence for postcolposcopic surveillance for cervical precancerous lesions.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon; Cosette M Wheeler; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Prevalence and clinical utility of human papilloma virus genotyping in patients with cervical lesions.

Authors:  Parminder Kaur; Aruna Aggarwal; Madhu Nagpal; Loveena Oberoi; Swati Sharma
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-04-12

6.  Sensitivity, specificity, and clinical value of human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 mRNA assay as a triage test for cervical cytology and HPV DNA test.

Authors:  Maria Benevolo; Amina Vocaturo; Donatella Caraceni; Deborah French; Sandra Rosini; Roberta Zappacosta; Irene Terrenato; Lucia Ciccocioppo; Antonio Frega; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Cervical cancer prevention--cervical screening: science in evolution.

Authors:  Mahboobeh Safaeian; Diane Solomon; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Langerhans cells from women with cervical precancerous lesions become functionally responsive against human papillomavirus after activation with stabilized Poly-I:C.

Authors:  Diane M Da Silva; Andrew W Woodham; Joseph G Skeate; Laurie K Rijkee; Julia R Taylor; Heike E Brand; Laila I Muderspach; Lynda D Roman; Annie A Yessaian; Huyen Q Pham; Koji Matsuo; Yvonne G Lin; Greg M McKee; Andres M Salazar; W Martin Kast
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: Bethesda classification and association with Human Papillomavirus.

Authors:  Ana Cristina Macêdo Barcelos; Márcia Antoniazi Michelin; Sheila Jorge Adad; Eddie Fernando Candido Murta
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06-29

10.  Establishment of a Korea HPV cohort study.

Authors:  Won-Chul Lee; Sae-Young Lee; Yu Jin Koo; Tae-Jin Kim; Soo Young Hur; Sung Ran Hong; Sung Soon Kim; Mee-Kyung Kee; Jee Eun Rhee; Joo Shil Lee; Ho Sun Choi; Chi Heum Cho; Ki Tae Kim; Jong Sup Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.