OBJECTIVE: At present, clinical management of women referred to colposcopy but found to have <CIN2 remains unclear. Using data from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) to inform clinical management, we calculated the absolute risk for developing CIN3 within 2 years of referral to an enrollment colposcopy. STUDY DESIGN: Women included in the analyses: (1) were initially referred to ALTS with a community cytologic interpretation of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL); (2) had a colposcopic evaluation and biopsy, if indicated, resulting in a diagnosis <CIN2; and, therefore (3) were followed without treatment. Results from subsequent human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, liquid-based cytology interpretations, and a second colposcopic evaluation at least 6 months after and within 2 years of the first colposcopic evaluation were used to calculate absolute risks for CIN3. RESULTS: Women with HPV-negative test results were at low risk for CIN3 regardless of other test results. Among HPV-positive women, increasing absolute risks of CIN3 were observed with increasing cytology severity: 7% (normal), 11% (ASCUS and LSIL), and 45% (HSIL). The highest absolute risk for CIN3 (67%) was observed for HPV-positive women with HSIL and a colposcopic impression of high-grade/cancer on the second colposcopy. CONCLUSION: In the ALTS population, after the first colposcopic diagnosis of <CIN2, clear risk stratification for CIN3 outcomes was obtained among women with a subsequent HPV-positive test. Because absolute risk for histologic CIN3 outcomes was high for women with HPV positive tests, HSIL cytology, and a high-grade impression at second colposcopy, it is worth considering whether this combination of findings might warrant immediate excisional therapy in some circumstances.
OBJECTIVE: At present, clinical management of women referred to colposcopy but found to have <CIN2 remains unclear. Using data from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) to inform clinical management, we calculated the absolute risk for developing CIN3 within 2 years of referral to an enrollment colposcopy. STUDY DESIGN:Women included in the analyses: (1) were initially referred to ALTS with a community cytologic interpretation of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL); (2) had a colposcopic evaluation and biopsy, if indicated, resulting in a diagnosis <CIN2; and, therefore (3) were followed without treatment. Results from subsequent human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, liquid-based cytology interpretations, and a second colposcopic evaluation at least 6 months after and within 2 years of the first colposcopic evaluation were used to calculate absolute risks for CIN3. RESULTS:Women with HPV-negative test results were at low risk for CIN3 regardless of other test results. Among HPV-positive women, increasing absolute risks of CIN3 were observed with increasing cytology severity: 7% (normal), 11% (ASCUS and LSIL), and 45% (HSIL). The highest absolute risk for CIN3 (67%) was observed for HPV-positive women with HSIL and a colposcopic impression of high-grade/cancer on the second colposcopy. CONCLUSION: In the ALTS population, after the first colposcopic diagnosis of <CIN2, clear risk stratification for CIN3 outcomes was obtained among women with a subsequent HPV-positive test. Because absolute risk for histologic CIN3 outcomes was high for women with HPV positive tests, HSIL cytology, and a high-grade impression at second colposcopy, it is worth considering whether this combination of findings might warrant immediate excisional therapy in some circumstances.
Authors: Andrew W Woodham; Ross W Cheloha; Jingjing Ling; Mohammad Rashidian; Stephen C Kolifrath; Maia Mesyngier; Joao N Duarte; Justin M Bader; Joseph G Skeate; Diane M Da Silva; W Martin Kast; Hidde L Ploegh Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Hormuzd A Katki; Julia C Gage; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Walter K Kinney Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Gaea Moore; Barbara Fetterman; J Thomas Cox; Nancy Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Walter Kinney; Philip E Castle Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Julia C Gage; Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon; Cosette M Wheeler; Philip E Castle Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Diane M Da Silva; Andrew W Woodham; Joseph G Skeate; Laurie K Rijkee; Julia R Taylor; Heike E Brand; Laila I Muderspach; Lynda D Roman; Annie A Yessaian; Huyen Q Pham; Koji Matsuo; Yvonne G Lin; Greg M McKee; Andres M Salazar; W Martin Kast Journal: Clin Immunol Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Won-Chul Lee; Sae-Young Lee; Yu Jin Koo; Tae-Jin Kim; Soo Young Hur; Sung Ran Hong; Sung Soon Kim; Mee-Kyung Kee; Jee Eun Rhee; Joo Shil Lee; Ho Sun Choi; Chi Heum Cho; Ki Tae Kim; Jong Sup Park Journal: J Gynecol Oncol Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 4.401