Literature DB >> 23519305

Five-year risks of CIN 3+ and cervical cancer among women with HPV-positive and HPV-negative high-grade Pap results.

Hormuzd A Katki1, Mark Schiffman, Philip E Castle, Barbara Fetterman, Nancy E Poitras, Thomas Lorey, Li C Cheung, Tina Raine-Bennett, Julia C Gage, Walter K Kinney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High-grade Pap results (e.g., atypical glandular cells [AGC], atypical squamous cells cannot rule out HSIL [ASC-H], and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL]) predict high cancer risks, resulting in referral for colposcopy without HPV triage. However, new guidelines recommending cotesting for women 30 years and older imply that clinicians will often receive the HPV test result concurrently for high-grade Pap results. We examined whether HPV testing provides useful risk stratification in this context.
METHODS: From a cohort of 965,360 women aged 30 to 64 years undergoing cotesting at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, we estimated 5-year risks for cervical cancer and CIN 3+ after AGC (2,074 women), ASC-H (1,647 women), and HSIL (2,019 women) according to HPV test results.
RESULTS: HPV positivity of AGC Pap results was 25% and decreased with age (30 to 34 vs 60 to 64 years, 44% vs 17%, p < .0001), whereas HPV positivity of ASC-H and HSIL was much higher (71% and 94%) and decreased less with age. Even for these high-grade Pap results, 5-year CIN 3+ risks differed substantially between HPV-positive and HPV-negative women (AGC, 33% vs 0.93%, p < .0001; ASC-H, 25% vs 3.5%, p < .0001; HSIL, 49% vs 30%, p = .006). However, except for AGC, cervical cancer risks differed less between HPV-positive and HPV-negative women (AGC, 9.0% vs 0.37%, p < .0001; ASC-H, 2.5% vs 2.1%, p = .8; HSIL, 6.6% vs 6.8%, p = .7).
CONCLUSIONS: The risks of CIN 3+ among women with HPV-negative high-grade Pap results were lower than those among women with HPV-positive high-grade Pap results, especially after AGC. However, by the principle of "equal management of equal risks," all HPV-negative high-grade Pap results had cancer risks high enough to warrant colposcopy, confirming that there is no current role for HPV triage of high-grade Pap results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23519305      PMCID: PMC3616447          DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182854282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  6 in total

1.  Benchmarking CIN 3+ risk as the basis for incorporating HPV and Pap cotesting into cervical screening and management guidelines.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Julia C Gage; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Walter K Kinney; Barbara Fetterman; Thomas Lorey; Nancy E Poitras; Li Cheung; Franklin Demuth; Mark Schiffman; Sholom Wacholder; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology.

Authors:  Diane Solomon; Diane Davey; Robert Kurman; Ann Moriarty; Dennis O'Connor; Marianne Prey; Stephen Raab; Mark Sherman; David Wilbur; Thomas Wright; Nancy Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Relationship of atypical glandular cell cytology, age, and human papillomavirus detection to cervical and endometrial cancer risks.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Ruth Shaber; Walter Kinney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Improving accuracy in gynecologic cytology. Results of the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.

Authors:  D D Davey; M L Nielsen; W J Frable; W Rosenstock; D M Lowell; B B Kraemer
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Five-year risks of CIN 3+ and cervical cancer among women with HPV testing of ASC-US Pap results.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Julia C Gage; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  A Suggested Approach to Simplify and Improve Cervical Screening in the United States.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Clinical application of DNA ploidy to cervical cancer screening: A review.

Authors:  David Garner
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

3.  Follow-up testing after colposcopy: five-year risk of CIN 2+ after a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN 1 or less.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Julia C Gage; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Does CIN2 Have the Same Aggressive Potential As CIN3? A Secondary Analysis of High-Grade Cytology Recurrence in Women Treated with Cold-Coagulation Cervical Treatment.

Authors:  D Papoutsis; M Underwood; W Parry-Smith; J Panikkar
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 5.  Triage of ASC-H: A meta-analysis of the accuracy of high-risk HPV testing and other markers to detect cervical precancer.

Authors:  Lan Xu; Freija Verdoodt; Nicolas Wentzensen; Christine Bergeron; Marc Arbyn
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Cervical premalignant lesions and their management.

Authors:  Faruk M Köse; Murat M Naki
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2014-06-01

7.  Risk of invasive cervical cancer after atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Jiangrong Wang; Bengt Andrae; Karin Sundström; Peter Ström; Alexander Ploner; K Miriam Elfström; Lisen Arnheim-Dahlström; Joakim Dillner; Pär Sparén
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-02-11

8.  Risks of CIN 2+, CIN 3+, and Cancer by Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Status: The Foundation of Risk-Based Cervical Screening Guidelines.

Authors:  Maria Demarco; Thomas S Lorey; Barbara Fetterman; Li C Cheung; Richard S Guido; Nicolas Wentzensen; Walter K Kinney; Nancy E Poitras; Brian Befano; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Absolute risks of cervical precancer among women who fulfill exiting guidelines based on HPV and cytology cotesting.

Authors:  Rebecca Landy; Mark Schiffman; Peter D Sasieni; Li C Cheung; Hormuzd A Katki; Greg Rydzak; Nicolas Wentzensen; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Walter K Kinney; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  LncRNA SRA1 is down-regulated in HPV-negative cervical squamous cell carcinoma and regulates cancer cell behaviors.

Authors:  Yunyong Liu; Mengdan Li; Huihui Yu; Haozhe Piao
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.