Literature DB >> 23519302

Benchmarking CIN 3+ risk as the basis for incorporating HPV and Pap cotesting into cervical screening and management guidelines.

Hormuzd A Katki1, Mark Schiffman, Philip E Castle, Barbara Fetterman, Nancy E Poitras, Thomas Lorey, Li C Cheung, Tina Raine-Bennett, Julia C Gage, Walter K Kinney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 2012, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and a consensus of 25 organizations endorsed concurrent cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing ("cotesting") for cervical cancer screening. Past screening and management guidelines were implicitly based on risks defined by Pap-alone, without consideration of HPV test results. To promote management that is consistent with accepted practice, new guidelines incorporating cotesting should aim to achieve equal management of women at equal risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer (CIN 3+).
METHODS: We estimated cumulative 5-year risks of CIN 3+ for 965,360 women aged 30 to 64 years undergoing cotesting at Kaiser Permanente Northern California over 2003 to 2010. We calculated the implicit risk thresholds for Pap-alone and applied them for new management guidance on HPV and Pap cotesting, citing 2 examples: HPV-positive/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and HPV-negative/Pap-negative. We call this guidance process "benchmarking."
RESULTS: A low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion result, for which immediate colposcopy is prescribed, carries a 5-year CIN 3+ risk of 5.2%, suggesting that test results with similar risks should be managed with colposcopy. Similarly, ASC-US (2.6% risk) is managed with a 6- to 12-month follow-up visit and Pap-negative (0.26% risk) is managed with a 3-year follow-up visit. The 5-year CIN 3+ risk for women with HPV-positive/ASC-US was 6.8% (95% confidence interval = 6.2%-7.6%). This is greater than the 5.2% risk implicitly leading to referral to colposcopy, consistent with current management recommendations that HPV-positive/ASC-US should be referred for immediate colposcopy. The 5-year CIN 3+ risk for women with HPV-negative/Pap-negative was 0.08% (95% confidence interval = 0.07%-0.09%), far below the 0.26% implicitly required for a 3-year return and justifying a longer (e.g., 5-year) return.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the principle of "equal management of equal risks," benchmarking to implicit risk thresholds based on Pap-alone can be used to achieve safe and consistent incorporation of cotesting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23519302      PMCID: PMC3616419          DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e318285423c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  13 in total

1.  Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study.

Authors:  M H Stoler; M Schiffman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-03-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Rate of and risks for regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Yifei Ma; Charles Wibbelsman; Teresa M Darragh; Adaleen Powers; Sepideh Farhat; Stephen Shiboski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology.

Authors:  Teresa M Darragh; Terence J Colgan; J Thomas Cox; Debra S Heller; Michael R Henry; Ronald D Luff; Timothy McCalmont; Ritu Nayar; Joel M Palefsky; Mark H Stoler; Edward J Wilkinson; Richard J Zaino; David C Wilbur
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Evaluating the risk of cervical precancer with a combination of cytologic, virologic, and visual methods.

Authors:  Sophia S Wang; Joan L Walker; Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Walter K Kinney; Barbara Fetterman; Thomas Lorey; Nancy E Poitras; Li Cheung; Franklin Demuth; Mark Schiffman; Sholom Wacholder; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  The relationship of community biopsy-diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to the quality control pathology-reviewed diagnoses: an ALTS report.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Mark H Stoler; Diane Solomon; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 7.  The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology.

Authors:  Diane Solomon; Diane Davey; Robert Kurman; Ann Moriarty; Dennis O'Connor; Marianne Prey; Stephen Raab; Mark Sherman; David Wilbur; Thomas Wright; Nancy Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Jose Jeronimo; Ana C Rodriguez; Sholom Wacholder
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Risk assessment to guide the prevention of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Mario Sideri; Jose Jeronimo; Diane Solomon; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Risk estimation for the next generation of prevention programmes for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Sholom Wacholder; Diane Solomon; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  63 in total

1.  A Suggested Approach to Simplify and Improve Cervical Screening in the United States.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Role of Screening History in Clinical Meaning and Optimal Management of Positive Cervical Screening Results.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Walter K Kinney; Xiaonan Xue; Li C Cheung; Julia C Gage; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas S Lorey; Hormuzd A Katki; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Long-term cumulative incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse after abnormal cytology: impact of HIV infection.

Authors:  L Stewart Massad; Christopher B Pierce; Howard Minkoff; D Heather Watts; Teresa M Darragh; Lorraine Sanchez-Keeland; Rodney L Wright; Christine Colie; Gypsyamber D'Souza
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 4.  Clinical application of DNA ploidy to cervical cancer screening: A review.

Authors:  David Garner
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

5.  Five-year risk of CIN 3+ to guide the management of women aged 21 to 24 years.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Julia C Gage; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Five-year risks of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ among women with HPV-positive and HPV-negative LSIL Pap results.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Julia C Gage; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Five-year risks of CIN 3+ and cervical cancer among women who test Pap-negative but are HPV-positive.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Julia C Gage; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Follow-up testing after colposcopy: five-year risk of CIN 2+ after a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN 1 or less.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Julia C Gage; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Mixture models for undiagnosed prevalent disease and interval-censored incident disease: applications to a cohort assembled from electronic health records.

Authors:  Li C Cheung; Qing Pan; Noorie Hyun; Mark Schiffman; Barbara Fetterman; Philip E Castle; Thomas Lorey; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Type-specific HPV and Pap test results among low-income, underserved women: providing insights into management strategies.

Authors:  Mona Saraiya; Vicki B Benard; April A Greek; Martin Steinau; Sonya Patel; L Stewart Massad; George F Sawaya; Elizabeth R Unger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.