Literature DB >> 22711081

Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Virginia A Moyer1.   

Abstract

DESCRIPTION: Update of the 2003 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation statement on screening for cervical cancer.
METHODS: The USPSTF reviewed new evidence on the comparative test performance of liquid-based cytology and the benefits and harms of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as a stand-alone test or in combination with cytology. In addition to the systematic evidence review, the USPSTF commissioned a decision analysis to help clarify the age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal interval for screening, and the relative benefits and harms of different strategies for screening (such as cytology and co-testing). RECOMMENDATIONS: This recommendation statement applies to women who have a cervix, regardless of sexual history. This recommendation statement does not apply to women who have received a diagnosis of a high-grade precancerous cervical lesion or cervical cancer, women with in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol, or women who are immunocompromised (such as those who are HIV positive).The USPSTF recommends screening for cervical cancer in women aged 21 to 65 years with cytology (Papanicolaou smear) every 3 years or, for women aged 30 to 65 years who want to lengthen the screening interval, screening with a combination of cytology and HPV testing every 5 years. See the Clinical Considerations for discussion of cytology method, HPV testing, and screening interval (A recommendation).The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women younger than age 21 years (D recommendation).The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women older than age 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and are not otherwise at high risk for cervical cancer. See the Clinical Considerations for discussion of adequacy of prior screening and risk factors (D recommendation).The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix and who do not have a history of a high-grade precancerous lesion (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3) or cervical cancer (D recommendation).The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer with HPV testing, alone or in combination with cytology, in women younger than age 30 years (D recommendation).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22711081     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  308 in total

1.  Human papillomavirus genotype-specific prevalence across the continuum of cervical neoplasia and cancer.

Authors:  Nancy E Joste; Brigitte M Ronnett; William C Hunt; Amanda Pearse; Erika Langsfeld; Thomas Leete; MaryAnn Jaramillo; Mark H Stoler; Philip E Castle; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  The association of social support and education with breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Patricia Documet; Todd M Bear; Jason D Flatt; Laura Macia; Jeanette Trauth; Edmund M Ricci
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2014-11-12

3.  Cervical screening and cervical cancer death among older women: a population-based, case-control study.

Authors:  Alison S Rustagi; Aruna Kamineni; Sheila Weinmann; Susan D Reed; Polly Newcomb; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Breast and cervical cancers diagnosed and stage at diagnosis among women served through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Janet Royalty; Jane Henley; Arica White; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals Preferred by U.S. Women.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Health care utilization and receipt of preventive care for patients seen at federally funded health centers compared to other sites of primary care.

Authors:  Neda Laiteerapong; James Kirby; Yue Gao; Tzy-Chyi Yu; Ravi Sharma; Robert Nocon; Sang Mee Lee; Marshall H Chin; Aviva G Nathan; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Type-specific HPV and Pap test results among low-income, underserved women: providing insights into management strategies.

Authors:  Mona Saraiya; Vicki B Benard; April A Greek; Martin Steinau; Sonya Patel; L Stewart Massad; George F Sawaya; Elizabeth R Unger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Associations between provider designation and female-specific cancer screening in women Veterans.

Authors:  Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Lori Bastian; Mark Trentalange; Terrence E Murphy; Melissa Skanderson; Heather Allore; Evelyn Reyes-Harvey; Natalya C Maisel; Vera Gaetano; Steven Wright; Sally Haskell; Cynthia Brandt
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Testing and genotyping of high-risk human papillomavirus by the cobas HPV Test and the Hybrid Capture 2 high-risk HPV DNA test using cervical and vaginal samples.

Authors:  Michael T Pyne; Christian Law; David R Hillyard; Robert Schlaberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Emily A Burger; Stephen Sy; Nicole G Campos
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.