Literature DB >> 23510558

STEPS: Similarity and Truth Estimation for Propagated Segmentations and its application to hippocampal segmentation and brain parcelation.

M Jorge Cardoso1, Kelvin Leung, Marc Modat, Shiva Keihaninejad, David Cash, Josephine Barnes, Nick C Fox, Sebastien Ourselin.   

Abstract

Anatomical segmentation of structures of interest is critical to quantitative analysis in medical imaging. Several automated multi-atlas based segmentation propagation methods that utilise manual delineations from multiple templates appear promising. However, high levels of accuracy and reliability are needed for use in diagnosis or in clinical trials. We propose a new local ranking strategy for template selection based on the locally normalised cross correlation (LNCC) and an extension to the classical STAPLE algorithm by Warfield et al. (2004), which we refer to as STEPS for Similarity and Truth Estimation for Propagated Segmentations. It addresses the well-known problems of local vs. global image matching and the bias introduced in the performance estimation due to structure size. We assessed the method on hippocampal segmentation using a leave-one-out cross validation with optimised model parameters; STEPS achieved a mean Dice score of 0.925 when compared with manual segmentation. This was significantly better in terms of segmentation accuracy when compared to other state-of-the-art fusion techniques. Furthermore, due to the finer anatomical scale, STEPS also obtains more accurate segmentations even when using only a third of the templates, reducing the dependence on large template databases. Using a subset of Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) scans from different MRI imaging systems and protocols, STEPS yielded similarly accurate segmentations (Dice=0.903). A cross-sectional and longitudinal hippocampal volumetric study was performed on the ADNI database. Mean±SD hippocampal volume (mm(3)) was 5195 ± 656 for controls; 4786 ± 781 for MCI; and 4427 ± 903 for Alzheimer's disease patients and hippocampal atrophy rates (%/year) of 1.09 ± 3.0, 2.74 ± 3.5 and 4.04 ± 3.6 respectively. Statistically significant (p<10(-3)) differences were found between disease groups for both hippocampal volume and volume change rates. Finally, STEPS was also applied in a multi-label segmentation propagation scenario using a leave-one-out cross validation, in order to parcellate 83 separate structures of the brain. Comparisons of STEPS with state-of-the-art multi-label fusion algorithms showed statistically significant segmentation accuracy improvements (p<10(-4)) in several key structures.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23510558     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2013.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  94 in total

1.  A logarithmic opinion pool based STAPLE algorithm for the fusion of segmentations with associated reliability weights.

Authors:  Alireza Akhondi-Asl; Lennox Hoyte; Mark E Lockhart; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Efficient multi-atlas abdominal segmentation on clinically acquired CT with SIMPLE context learning.

Authors:  Zhoubing Xu; Ryan P Burke; Christopher P Lee; Rebeccah B Baucom; Benjamin K Poulose; Richard G Abramson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 3.  Automated methods for hippocampus segmentation: the evolution and a review of the state of the art.

Authors:  Vanderson Dill; Alexandre Rosa Franco; Márcio Sarroglia Pinho
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2015-04

4.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Presymptomatic atrophy in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: A serial magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Kirsi M Kinnunen; David M Cash; Teresa Poole; Chris Frost; Tammie L S Benzinger; R Laila Ahsan; Kelvin K Leung; M Jorge Cardoso; Marc Modat; Ian B Malone; John C Morris; Randall J Bateman; Daniel S Marcus; Alison Goate; Stephen P Salloway; Stephen Correia; Reisa A Sperling; Jasmeer P Chhatwal; Richard P Mayeux; Adam M Brickman; Ralph N Martins; Martin R Farlow; Bernardino Ghetti; Andrew J Saykin; Clifford R Jack; Peter R Schofield; Eric McDade; Michael W Weiner; John M Ringman; Paul M Thompson; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe; Martin N Rossor; Sebastien Ourselin; Nick C Fox
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 21.566

6.  Statistical label fusion with hierarchical performance models.

Authors:  Andrew J Asman; Alexander S Dagley; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-21

7.  Groupwise multi-atlas segmentation of the spinal cord's internal structure.

Authors:  Andrew J Asman; Frederick W Bryan; Seth A Smith; Daniel S Reich; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Segmenting hippocampus from infant brains by sparse patch matching with deep-learned features.

Authors:  Yanrong Guo; Guorong Wu; Leah A Commander; Stephanie Szary; Valerie Jewells; Weili Lin; Dinggang Shent
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014

9.  Robust multi-atlas label propagation by deep sparse representation.

Authors:  Chen Zu; Zhengxia Wang; Daoqiang Zhang; Peipeng Liang; Yonghong Shi; Dinggang Shen; Guorong Wu
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 7.740

10.  Automated versus manual hippocampal segmentation in preoperative and postoperative patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  Sierra C Germeyan; David Kalikhman; Lucy Jones; William H Theodore
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.