Literature DB >> 24556080

Groupwise multi-atlas segmentation of the spinal cord's internal structure.

Andrew J Asman1, Frederick W Bryan2, Seth A Smith3, Daniel S Reich4, Bennett A Landman5.   

Abstract

The spinal cord is an essential and vulnerable component of the central nervous system. Differentiating and localizing the spinal cord internal structure (i.e., gray matter vs. white matter) is critical for assessment of therapeutic impacts and determining prognosis of relevant conditions. Fortunately, new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences enable clinical study of the in vivo spinal cord's internal structure. Yet, low contrast-to-noise ratio, artifacts, and imaging distortions have limited the applicability of tissue segmentation techniques pioneered elsewhere in the central nervous system. Additionally, due to the inter-subject variability exhibited on cervical MRI, typical deformable volumetric registrations perform poorly, limiting the applicability of a typical multi-atlas segmentation framework. Thus, to date, no automated algorithms have been presented for the spinal cord's internal structure. Herein, we present a novel slice-based groupwise registration framework for robustly segmenting cervical spinal cord MRI. Specifically, we provide a method for (1) pre-aligning the slice-based atlases into a groupwise-consistent space, (2) constructing a model of spinal cord variability, (3) projecting the target slice into the low-dimensional space using a model-specific registration cost function, and (4) estimating robust segmentation susing geodesically appropriate atlas information. Moreover, the proposed framework provides a natural mechanism for performing atlas selection and initializing the free model parameters in an informed manner. In a cross-validation experiment using 67 MR volumes of the cervical spinal cord, we demonstrate sub-millimetric accuracy, significant quantitative and qualitative improvement over comparable multi-atlas frameworks, and provide insight into the sensitivity of the associated model parameters.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spinal cord segmentation; Groupwise registration; Multi-atlas segmentation; Spinal cord internal structure

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24556080      PMCID: PMC4009677          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2014.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  59 in total

1.  Normalized cuts in 3-D for spinal MRI segmentation.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Serge J Belongie; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation.

Authors:  Pierrick Coupé; José V Manjón; Vladimir Fonov; Jens Pruessner; Montserrat Robles; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Spinal crawlers: deformable organisms for spinal cord segmentation and analysis.

Authors:  Chris McIntosh; Ghassan Hamarneh
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2006

4.  Hierarchical segmentation and identification of thoracic vertebra using learning-based edge detection and coarse-to-fine deformable model.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Le Lu; Yiqiang Zhan; Xiang Zhou; Marcos Salganicoff; Arun Krishnan
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2010

5.  Incorporating priors on expert performance parameters for segmentation validation and label fusion: a maximum a posteriori STAPLE.

Authors:  Olivier Commowick; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2010

6.  Learning-based vertebra detection and iterative normalized-cut segmentation for spinal MRI.

Authors:  Szu-Hao Huang; Yi-Hong Chu; Shang-Hong Lai; Carol L Novak
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Automated diffeomorphic registration of anatomical structures with rigid parts: application to dynamic cervical MRI.

Authors:  Olivier Commowick; Nicolas Wiest-Daesslé; Sylvain Prima
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2012

8.  A learning-based wrapper method to correct systematic errors in automatic image segmentation: consistently improved performance in hippocampus, cortex and brain segmentation.

Authors:  Hongzhi Wang; Sandhitsu R Das; Jung Wook Suh; Murat Altinay; John Pluta; Caryne Craige; Brian Avants; Paul A Yushkevich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  AQP4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica: diagnostic and pathogenetic relevance.

Authors:  Sven Jarius; Brigitte Wildemann
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain.

Authors:  B B Avants; C L Epstein; M Grossman; J C Gee
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 8.545

View more
  22 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Clinically Feasible Microstructural MRI to Quantify Cervical Spinal Cord Tissue Injury Using DTI, MT, and T2*-Weighted Imaging: Assessment of Normative Data and Reliability.

Authors:  A R Martin; B De Leener; J Cohen-Adad; D W Cadotte; S Kalsi-Ryan; S F Lange; L Tetreault; A Nouri; A Crawley; D J Mikulis; H Ginsberg; M G Fehlings
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Simultaneous total intracranial volume and posterior fossa volume estimation using multi-atlas label fusion.

Authors:  Yuankai Huo; Andrew J Asman; Andrew J Plassard; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Abdomen and spinal cord segmentation with augmented active shape models.

Authors:  Zhoubing Xu; Benjamin N Conrad; Rebeccah B Baucom; Seth A Smith; Benjamin K Poulose; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-08-26

Review 5.  Future Brain and Spinal Cord Volumetric Imaging in the Clinic for Monitoring Treatment Response in MS.

Authors:  Tim Sinnecker; Cristina Granziera; Jens Wuerfel; Regina Schlaeger
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Minimally interactive placenta segmentation from three-dimensional ultrasound images.

Authors:  Ipek Oguz; Natalie Yushkevich; Alison Pouch; Baris U Oguz; Jiancong Wang; Shobhana Parameshwaran; James Gee; Paul A Yushkevich; Nadav Schwartz
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-22

Review 7.  Segmentation of the human spinal cord.

Authors:  Benjamin De Leener; Manuel Taso; Julien Cohen-Adad; Virginie Callot
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Amide proton transfer CEST of the cervical spinal cord in multiple sclerosis patients at 3T.

Authors:  Samantha By; Robert L Barry; Alex K Smith; Bailey D Lyttle; Bailey A Box; Francesca R Bagnato; Siddharama Pawate; Seth A Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Quantifying the impact of underlying measurement error on cervical spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging at 3T.

Authors:  Samantha By; Alex K Smith; Lindsey M Dethrage; Bailey D Lyttle; Bennett A Landman; Jeffrey L Creasy; Siddharama Pawate; Seth A Smith
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  A multiple-image-based method to evaluate the performance of deformable image registration in the pelvis.

Authors:  Ziad Saleh; Maria Thor; Aditya P Apte; Gregory Sharp; Xiaoli Tang; Harini Veeraraghavan; Ludvig Muren; Joseph Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.