Literature DB >> 27942077

Robust multi-atlas label propagation by deep sparse representation.

Chen Zu1, Zhengxia Wang2, Daoqiang Zhang3, Peipeng Liang4, Yonghong Shi5, Dinggang Shen6, Guorong Wu7.   

Abstract

Recently, multi-atlas patch-based label fusion has achieved many successes in medical imaging area. The basic assumption in the current state-of-the-art approaches is that the image patch at the target image point can be represented by a patch dictionary consisting of atlas patches from registered atlas images. Therefore, the label at the target image point can be determined by fusing labels of atlas image patches with similar anatomical structures. However, such assumption on image patch representation does not always hold in label fusion since (1) the image content within the patch may be corrupted due to noise and artifact; and (2) the distribution of morphometric patterns among atlas patches might be unbalanced such that the majority patterns can dominate label fusion result over other minority patterns. The violation of the above basic assumptions could significantly undermine the label fusion accuracy. To overcome these issues, we first consider forming label-specific group for the atlas patches with the same label. Then, we alter the conventional flat and shallow dictionary to a deep multi-layer structure, where the top layer (label-specific dictionaries) consists of groups of representative atlas patches and the subsequent layers (residual dictionaries) hierarchically encode the patchwise residual information in different scales. Thus, the label fusion follows the representation consensus across representative dictionaries. However, the representation of target patch in each group is iteratively optimized by using the representative atlas patches in each label-specific dictionary exclusively to match the principal patterns and also using all residual patterns across groups collaboratively to overcome the issue that some groups might be absent of certain variation patterns presented in the target image patch. Promising segmentation results have been achieved in labeling hippocampus on ADNI dataset, as well as basal ganglia and brainstem structures, compared to other counterpart label fusion methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hierarchical sparse representation; Multi-atlas segmentation; Patch-based label fusion

Year:  2016        PMID: 27942077      PMCID: PMC5144541          DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pattern Recognit        ISSN: 0031-3203            Impact factor:   7.740


  19 in total

1.  Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation.

Authors:  Pierrick Coupé; José V Manjón; Vladimir Fonov; Jens Pruessner; Montserrat Robles; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Diffeomorphic demons: efficient non-parametric image registration.

Authors:  Tom Vercauteren; Xavier Pennec; Aymeric Perchant; Nicholas Ayache
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Local label learning (LLL) for subcortical structure segmentation: application to hippocampus segmentation.

Authors:  Yongfu Hao; Tianyao Wang; Xinqing Zhang; Yunyun Duan; Chunshui Yu; Tianzi Jiang; Yong Fan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Atlas encoding by randomized forests for efficient label propagation.

Authors:  Darko Zikic; Ben Glocker; Antonio Criminisi
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

5.  A supervised patch-based approach for human brain labeling.

Authors:  Françcois Rousseau; Piotr A Habas; Colin Studholme
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Hippocampal and entorhinal atrophy in mild cognitive impairment: prediction of Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  D P Devanand; G Pradhaban; X Liu; A Khandji; S De Santi; S Segal; H Rusinek; G H Pelton; L S Honig; R Mayeux; Y Stern; M H Tabert; M J de Leon
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Automatic hippocampus segmentation of 7.0 Tesla MR images by combining multiple atlases and auto-context models.

Authors:  Minjeong Kim; Guorong Wu; Wei Li; Li Wang; Young-Don Son; Zang-Hee Cho; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion.

Authors:  Rolf A Heckemann; Joseph V Hajnal; Paul Aljabar; Daniel Rueckert; Alexander Hammers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Segmentation of MR images via discriminative dictionary learning and sparse coding: application to hippocampus labeling.

Authors:  Tong Tong; Robin Wolz; Pierrick Coupé; Joseph V Hajnal; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  STEPS: Similarity and Truth Estimation for Propagated Segmentations and its application to hippocampal segmentation and brain parcelation.

Authors:  M Jorge Cardoso; Kelvin Leung; Marc Modat; Shiva Keihaninejad; David Cash; Josephine Barnes; Nick C Fox; Sebastien Ourselin
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 8.545

View more
  6 in total

1.  Patch-Based Label Fusion with Structured Discriminant Embedding for Hippocampus Segmentation.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Guangkai Ma; Xi Wu; Jiliu Zhou
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2018-10

2.  Strength and Similarity Guided Group-level Brain Functional Network Construction for MCI Diagnosis.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Han Zhang; Xiaobo Chen; Mingxia Liu; Xiaofeng Zhu; Seong-Whan Lee; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 7.740

3.  A Multi-Atlas Label Fusion Tool for Neonatal Brain MRI Parcellation and Quantification.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Otsuka; Linda Chang; Yukako Kawasaki; Dan Wu; Can Ceritoglu; Kumiko Oishi; Thomas Ernst; Michael Miller; Susumu Mori; Kenichi Oishi
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Multi-atlas label fusion with random local binary pattern features: Application to hippocampus segmentation.

Authors:  Hancan Zhu; Zhenyu Tang; Hewei Cheng; Yihong Wu; Yong Fan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Integrating Semi-supervised and Supervised Learning Methods for Label Fusion in Multi-Atlas Based Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Qiang Zheng; Yihong Wu; Yong Fan
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.081

6.  Extended multimodal whole-brain anatomical covariance analysis: detection of disrupted correlation networks related to amyloid deposition.

Authors:  Chenfei Ye; Marilyn Albert; Timothy Brown; Murat Bilgel; Johnny Hsu; Ting Ma; Brian Caffo; Michael I Miller; Susumu Mori; Kenichi Oishi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-07-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.