Literature DB >> 29036376

The mechanism and high-free-energy transition state of lac repressor-lac operator interaction.

Rituparna Sengupta1,2, Michael W Capp2, Irina A Shkel2,3, M Thomas Record1,2,3.   

Abstract

Significant, otherwise-unavailable information about mechanisms and transition states (TS) of protein folding and binding is obtained from solute effects on rate constants. Here we characterize TS for lac repressor(R)-lac operator(O) binding by analyzing effects of RO-stabilizing and RO-destabilizing solutes on association (ka) and dissociation (kd) rate constants. RO-destabilizing solutes (urea, KCl) reduce ka comparably (urea) or more than (KCl) they increase kd, demonstrating that they destabilize TS relative to reactants and RO, and that TS exhibits most of the Coulombic interactions between R and O. Strikingly, three solutes which stabilize RO by favoring burial/dehydration of amide oxygens and anionic phosphate oxygens all reduce kd without affecting ka significantly. The lack of stabilization of TS by these solutes indicates that O phosphates remain hydrated in TS and that TS preferentially buries aromatic carbons and amide nitrogens while leaving amide oxygens exposed. In our proposed mechanism, DNA-binding-domains (DBD) of R insert in major grooves of O pre-TS, forming most Coulombic interactions of RO and burying aromatic carbons. Nucleation of hinge helices creates TS, burying sidechain amide nitrogens. Post-TS, hinge helices assemble and the DBD-hinge helix-O-DNA module docks on core repressor, partially dehydrating phosphate oxygens and tightening all interfaces to form RO.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29036376      PMCID: PMC5727403          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  49 in total

1.  Plasticity in protein-DNA recognition: lac repressor interacts with its natural operator 01 through alternative conformations of its DNA-binding domain.

Authors:  Charalampos G Kalodimos; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Roberto K Salinas; Rainer Wechselberger; Rolf Boelens; Robert Kaptein
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Facilitated target location in biological systems.

Authors:  P H von Hippel; O G Berg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-01-15       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  A closer view of the conformation of the Lac repressor bound to operator.

Authors:  C E Bell; M Lewis
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-03

4.  Use of urea and glycine betaine to quantify coupled folding and probe the burial of DNA phosphates in lac repressor-lac operator binding.

Authors:  Jiang Hong; Mike W Capp; Ruth M Saecker; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Operator DNA sequence variation enhances high affinity binding by hinge helix mutants of lactose repressor protein.

Authors:  C M Falcon; K S Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Equilibrium binding of inducer to lac repressor.operator DNA complex.

Authors:  R B O'Gorman; J M Rosenberg; O B Kallai; R E Dickerson; K Itakura; A D Riggs; K S Matthews
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1980-11-10       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Diffusion-driven mechanisms of protein translocation on nucleic acids. 3. The Escherichia coli lac repressor--operator interaction: kinetic measurements and conclusions.

Authors:  R B Winter; O G Berg; P H von Hippel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1981-11-24       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Crystal structure of the lactose operon repressor and its complexes with DNA and inducer.

Authors:  M Lewis; G Chang; N C Horton; M A Kercher; H C Pace; M A Schumacher; R G Brennan; P Lu
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Quantifying functional group interactions that determine urea effects on nucleic acid helix formation.

Authors:  Emily J Guinn; Jeffrey J Schwinefus; Hyo Keun Cha; Joseph L McDevitt; Wolf E Merker; Ryan Ritzer; Gregory W Muth; Samuel W Engelsgjerd; Kathryn E Mangold; Perry J Thompson; Michael J Kerins; M Thomas Record
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Heat capacity effects in protein folding and ligand binding: a re-evaluation of the role of water in biomolecular thermodynamics.

Authors:  Alan Cooper
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 2.352

View more
  3 in total

1.  How Glutamate Promotes Liquid-liquid Phase Separation and DNA Binding Cooperativity of E. coli SSB Protein.

Authors:  Alexander G Kozlov; Xian Cheng; Hongshan Zhang; Min Kyung Shinn; Elizabeth Weiland; Binh Nguyen; Irina A Shkel; Emily Zytkiewicz; Ilya J Finkelstein; M Thomas Record; Timothy M Lohman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 6.151

2.  Fluorescence-Detected Conformational Changes in Duplex DNA in Open Complex Formation by Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase: Upstream Wrapping and Downstream Bending Precede Clamp Opening and Insertion of the Downstream Duplex.

Authors:  Raashi Sreenivasan; Irina A Shkel; Munish Chhabra; Amanda Drennan; Sara Heitkamp; Hao-Che Wang; Malavika A Sridevi; Dylan Plaskon; Christina McNerney; Katelyn Callies; Clare K Cimperman; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Lactose repressor hinge domain independently binds DNA.

Authors:  Joseph S Xu; Madeleine N Hewitt; Jaskeerat S Gulati; Matthew A Cruz; Hongli Zhan; Shirley Liu; Kathleen S Matthews
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 6.725

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.