Literature DB >> 23483085

Image quality assessment in panoramic dental radiography: a comparative study between conventional and digital systems.

Akmal Sabarudin1, Yu Jin Tiau.   

Abstract

This study is designed to compare and evaluate the diagnostic image quality of dental panoramic radiography between conventional and digital systems. Fifty-four panoramic images were collected and divided into three groups consisting of conventional, digital with and without post processing image. Each image was printed out and scored subjectively by two experienced dentists who were blinded to the exposure parameters and system protocols. The evaluation covers of anatomical coverage and structures, density and image contrast. The overall image quality score revealed that digital panoramic with post-processing scored the highest of 3.45±0.19, followed by digital panoramic system without post-processing and conventional panoramic system with corresponding scores of 3.33±0.33 and 2.06±0.40. In conclusion, images produced by digital panoramic system are better in diagnostic image quality than that from conventional panoramic system. Digital post-processing visualization can improve diagnostic quality significantly in terms of radiographic density and contrast.

Keywords:  Conventional panoramic system; digital panoramic system; image quality assessment; panoramic dental radiography

Year:  2013        PMID: 23483085      PMCID: PMC3591502          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2013.02.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  17 in total

1.  Effect of dose reduction in digital dental panoramic radiography on image quality.

Authors:  B Dannewitz; Stefan Hassfeld; P Eickholz; J Mühling
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].

Authors:  H Visser; K P Hermann; S Bredemeier; B Köhler
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2000-07

3.  Evaluation of a new digital panoramic system: a comparison with film.

Authors:  A Ramesh; D A Tyndall; J B Ludlow
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Subjective image quality of digital panoramic radiographs displayed on monitor and printed on various hardcopy media.

Authors:  Frieda Gijbels; Gerard Sanderink; Herman Pauwels; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-12-02       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Image processing and enhancement provided by commercial dental software programs.

Authors:  T M Lehmann; E Troeltsch; K Spitzer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Image quality of two solid-state and three photostimulable phosphor plate digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal.

Authors:  I S Benediktsdottir; H Hintze; J K Petersen; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.

Authors:  B Molander; H-G Gröndahl; A Ekestubbe
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system.

Authors:  Nikos Parissis; Christos Angelopoulos; Stephen Mantegari; Stelios Karamanis; Farah Masood; Anastasios Tsirlis
Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract       Date:  2010-01-01

9.  Dose reduction by direct-digital cephalometric radiography.

Authors:  H Visser; T Rödig; K P Hermann
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Reliability of digital radiography of interproximal dental caries.

Authors:  Etje Sanden; Andreas Koob; Stefan Hassfeld; Hans Jörg Staehle; Peter Eickholz
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.522

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The missing link in image quality assessment in digital dental radiography.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Okamura; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Correlating the clinical assessment of impacted mandibular third molars with panoramic radiograph and intraoral periapical radiograph.

Authors:  P Vani Priya; Fazil A Nasyam; M Ramprasad; Narendra V Penumatsa; Syed Akifuddin
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2016-12

3.  Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Periapical Disease Detection in Dental Radiographs.

Authors:  Michael G Endres; Florian Hillen; Marios Salloumis; Ahmad R Sedaghat; Stefan M Niehues; Olivia Quatela; Henning Hanken; Ralf Smeets; Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter; Carsten Rendenbach; Karim Lakhani; Max Heiland; Robert A Gaudin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24

4.  A Questionnaire of Digital Radiography and CBCT Use and Knowledge among Lithuanian Dentists.

Authors:  Vestina Masyte; Simona Sefeldaite; Tadas Venskutonis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2021-03-31

5.  Validity of the Demirjian Method for Dental Age Estimation in Romanian Children.

Authors:  Abel Emanuel Moca; Gabriela Ciavoi; Bianca Ioana Todor; Bianca Maria Negruțiu; Emilia Albinița Cuc; Raluca Dima; Rahela Tabita Moca; Luminița Ligia Vaida
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-16

6.  COVID-19 and beyond: implications for dental radiography.

Authors:  Rachel Little; Jessica Howell; Paul Nixon
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.727

7.  Image quality assessment of pre-processed and post-processed digital panoramic radiographs in paediatric patients with mixed dentition.

Authors:  Isti Rahayu Suryani; Natalia Salvo Villegas; Sohaib Shujaat; Annelore De Grauwe; Azhari Azhari; Suhardjo Sitam; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2018-12-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.