Literature DB >> 20098961

A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system.

Nikos Parissis1, Christos Angelopoulos, Stephen Mantegari, Stelios Karamanis, Farah Masood, Anastasios Tsirlis.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare digital panoramic images acquired for the presurgical assessment of third molars captured with a storage phosphor-based system with conventional film panoramic radiographs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 51 pairs of digital and conventional panoramic images, made simultaneously, were included in this study. The images were evaluated for diagnostic quality prior to third molar surgery by two experienced oral surgeons and rated with a four-point grading scale.
RESULTS: Despite the fact that conventional panoramic images were rated higher than the digital images, the difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Conventional and digital panoramic images were found to be of comparable image quality with regard to their diagnostic contribution to third molar surgery. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study is contributory to understanding differences in image quality between digital and conventional panoramic radiography for certain diagnostic tasks. The lack of significant differences in image quality may be an endorsement for digital panoramic radiography.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20098961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract        ISSN: 1526-3711


  7 in total

1.  Influence of the intergonial distance on image distortion in panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  D B S Ladeira; A D Cruz; S M Almeida; F N Bóscolo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Image quality assessment in panoramic dental radiography: a comparative study between conventional and digital systems.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Yu Jin Tiau
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-02

Review 3.  The missing link in image quality assessment in digital dental radiography.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Okamura; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Radiopacity of Methacrylate and Silorane Composite Resins Using a Digital Radiographic System.

Authors:  Leily Macedo Firoozmand; Mariana Gonçalves Cordeiro; Marcos André Dos Santos Da Silva; Rudys Rodolfo De Jesus Tavarez; Etevaldo Matos Maia Filho
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2016-09-19

5.  The best radiographic method for determining root canal morphology in mandibular first premolars: A study of Chinese descendants in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Tzu-Yi Lu; Yi-Chen Chen; Shue-Fen Yang
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.080

6.  Assessment of endodontically treated teeth by using different radiographic methods: an ex vivo comparison between CBCT and other radiographic techniques.

Authors:  Kemal Özgür Demiralp; Kıvanç Kamburoğlu; Kahraman Güngör; Selcen Yüksel; Gokcen Demiralp; Ozlem Uçok
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2012-09-21

7.  Image quality assessment of pre-processed and post-processed digital panoramic radiographs in paediatric patients with mixed dentition.

Authors:  Isti Rahayu Suryani; Natalia Salvo Villegas; Sohaib Shujaat; Annelore De Grauwe; Azhari Azhari; Suhardjo Sitam; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2018-12-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.