Literature DB >> 11407766

Dose reduction by direct-digital cephalometric radiography.

H Visser1, T Rödig, K P Hermann.   

Abstract

Patient radiation exposure was determined for conventional and direct-digital cephalometric radiography. An anthropomorphic phantom was positioned to expose lateral cephalographs from the patient's left side. The conventional radiographs were exposed with a Siemens Orthophos C unit (77 kV, 14 mA, 0.5 s) and a film-screen system of a relative speed of 400. The direct-digital radiographs were exposed with a Siemens Orthophos DS Ceph (73 kV, 15 mA, 15.8 s). A set of 108 thermoluminescence detectors (TLDs; Bicron STI/Harshaw, Solon, Ohio) was used for dose measurements. For each measurement, 84 TLDs were placed at the surface of the head and neck, as well as inside the phantom, at anatomically relevant positions. The remaining detectors were employed for calibration purposes and quality control. The highest absorbed doses were recorded for the conventional technique at the skin of the left parotid region (132 microGy), in the left parotid gland (103 microGy), and in the ocular lens of the left eye (81 microGy). Digital cephalometry resulted in an absorbed dose about 2 times lower than the dose received by the conventional technique. The effective doses had the same relation (conventional 2.3 microSv; digital 1.1 microSv). The results demonstrate that direct-digital cephalometric radiography cuts the patient's dose in half compared with the conventional screen-film technique. Direct-digital cephalometry is more advantageous than the conventional technique from the perspective of radiation protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11407766     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0159:DRBDDC>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  9 in total

Review 1.  Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Reinhilde Jacobs; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Recent advances in imaging technologies in dentistry.

Authors:  Naseem Shah; Nikhil Bansal; Ajay Logani
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-28

3.  Image quality assessment in panoramic dental radiography: a comparative study between conventional and digital systems.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Yu Jin Tiau
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-02

4.  Patient radiation dose and protection from cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Gang Li
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2013-06-14

5.  Reproducibility of measurements in tablet-assisted, PC-aided, and manual cephalometric analysis.

Authors:  Cecilia Goracci; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Cone-beam computed tomography and radiographs in dentistry: aspects related to radiation dose.

Authors:  Diego Coelho Lorenzoni; Ana Maria Bolognese; Daniela Gamba Garib; Fabio Ribeiro Guedes; Eduardo Franzotti Sant'anna
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-04-04

7.  The Effect of Emboss Enhancement on Reliability of Landmark Identification in Digital Lateral Cephalometric Images.

Authors:  Sima Nikneshan; Sudeh Mohseni; Mahtab Nouri; Hoora Hadian; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 0.212

8.  Effect of image compression of direct digital lateral cephalograms on the identification of cephalometric points.

Authors:  Sima Saghaie; Roshanak Ghaffari
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-01

Review 9.  Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Dawn of A New Imaging Modality in Orthodontics.

Authors:  J Mamatha; K R Chaitra; Renji K Paul; Merin George; J Anitha; Bharti Khanna
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.