Literature DB >> 23460054

Screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer diagnosis in average-risk adults: a nested case-control study.

Chyke A Doubeni1, Sheila Weinmann, Kenneth Adams, Aruna Kamineni, Diana S M Buist, Arlene S Ash, Carolyn M Rutter, V Paul Doria-Rose, Douglas A Corley, Robert T Greenlee, Jessica Chubak, Andrew Williams, Aimee R Kroll-Desrosiers, Eric Johnson, Joseph Webster, Kathryn Richert-Boe, Theodore R Levin, Robert H Fletcher, Noel S Weiss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in average-risk adults is uncertain, particularly for right colon cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer (CRC).
DESIGN: Nested case-control study.
SETTING: Four U.S. health plans. PATIENTS: 1039 average-risk adults enrolled for at least 5 years in one of the health plans. Case patients were aged 55 to 85 years on their diagnosis date (reference date) of stage IIB or higher (late-stage) CRC during 2006 to 2008. One or 2 control patients were selected for each case patient, matched on birth year, sex, health plan, and prior enrollment duration. MEASUREMENTS: Receipt of CRC screening 3 months to 10 years before the reference date, ascertained through medical record audits. Case patients and control patients were compared on receipt of screening colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy by using conditional logistic regression that accounted for health history, socioeconomic status, and other screening exposures.
RESULTS: In analyses restricted to 471 eligible case patients and their 509 matched control patients, 13 case patients (2.8%) and 46 control patients (9.0%) had undergone screening colonoscopy, which corresponded to an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 0.29 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.58) for any late-stage CRC, 0.36 (CI, 0.16 to 0.80) for right colon cancer, and 0.26 (CI, 0.06 to 1.11; P = 0.069) for left colon/rectum cancer. Ninety-two case patients (19.5%) and 173 control patients (34.0%) had screening sigmoidoscopy, corresponding to an AOR of 0.50 (CI, 0.36 to 0.70) overall, 0.79 (CI, 0.51 to 1.23) for right colon late-stage cancer, and 0.26 (CI, 0.14 to 0.48) for left colon cancer. LIMITATION: The small number of screening colonoscopies affected the precision of the estimates.
CONCLUSION: Screening with colonoscopy in average-risk persons was associated with reduced risk for diagnosis of incident late-stage CRC, including right-sided colon cancer. For sigmoidoscopy, this association was seen for left CRC, but the association for right colon late-stage cancer was not statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23460054      PMCID: PMC3752391          DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  33 in total

1.  Less is more: not "going the distance" and why.

Authors:  Russell Harris; Linda S Kinsinger
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Colonoscopy and fecal occult blood test use in Germany: results from a large insurance-based cohort.

Authors:  C Stock; P Ihle; I Schubert; H Brenner
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Family History and Improving Health.

Authors:  Alfred O Berg; Macaran A Baird; Jeffrey R Botkin; Deborah A Driscoll; Paul A Fishman; Peter D Guarino; Robert A Hiatt; Gail P Jarvik; Sandra Millon-Underwood; Thomas M Morgan; John J Mulvihill; Toni I Pollin; Selma R Schimmel; Michael Edward Stefanek; William M Vollmer; Janet K Williams
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wendy S Atkin; Rob Edwards; Ines Kralj-Hans; Kate Wooldrage; Andrew R Hart; John M A Northover; D Max Parkin; Jane Wardle; Stephen W Duffy; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Jenny Chang-Claude; Christoph M Seiler; Alexander Rickert; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Health status, neighborhood socioeconomic context, and premature mortality in the United States: The National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Mario Schootman; Jacqueline M Major; Rosalie A Torres Stone; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Yikyung Park; Min Lian; Lynne Messer; Barry I Graubard; Rashmi Sinha; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Socioeconomic and racial patterns of colorectal cancer screening among Medicare enrollees in 2000 to 2005.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; George Reed; Terry S Field; Robert H Fletcher
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial--SCORE.

Authors:  Nereo Segnan; Paola Armaroli; Luigina Bonelli; Mauro Risio; Stefania Sciallero; Marco Zappa; Bruno Andreoni; Arrigo Arrigoni; Luigi Bisanti; Claudia Casella; Cristiano Crosta; Fabio Falcini; Franco Ferrero; Adriano Giacomin; Orietta Giuliani; Alessandra Santarelli; Carmen Beatriz Visioli; Roberto Zanetti; Wendy S Atkin; Carlo Senore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Neighborhood socioeconomic status and use of colonoscopy in an insured population--a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Guruprasad D Jambaulikar; Hassan Fouayzi; Scott B Robinson; Margaret J Gunter; Terry S Field; Douglas W Roblin; Robert H Fletcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  70 in total

1.  Probability of high-risk colorectal neoplasm recurrence based on the results of two previous colonoscopies.

Authors:  Hye Won Park; Seungbong Han; Ji Young Lee; Hye-Sook Chang; Jaewon Choe; Yunsik Choi; Hoonsub So; Dong-Hoon Yang; Seung-Jae Myung; Suk-Kyun Yang; Jin-Ho Kim; Jeong-Sik Byeon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  The Cancer Research Network: a platform for epidemiologic and health services research on cancer prevention, care, and outcomes in large, stable populations.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Rebecca Ziebell; Robert T Greenlee; Stacey Honda; Mark C Hornbrook; Mara Epstein; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Pamala A Pawloski; Debra P Ritzwoller; Nirupa R Ghai; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Heather A Clancy; V Paul Doria-Rose; Lawrence H Kushi
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Protective association of colonoscopy against proximal and distal colon cancer and patterns in interval cancer.

Authors:  Amandeep K Shergill; Erin E Conners; Kenneth R McQuaid; Sara Epstein; James C Ryan; Janak N Shah; John Inadomi; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Across Healthcare Systems.

Authors:  Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Shivan J Mehta; Yingye Zheng; Nirupa R Ghai; Dale F McLerran; Jessica Chubak; Virginia P Quinn; Celette Sugg Skinner; Douglas A Corley; John M Inadomi; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Colonoscopy: the current king of the hill in the USA.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Area-level income disparities in colorectal screening in Canada: evidence to inform future surveillance.

Authors:  A Blair; L Gauvin; S Ouédraogo; G D Datta
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Race/Ethnicity and Adoption of a Population Health Management Approach to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Community-Based Healthcare System.

Authors:  Shivan J Mehta; Christopher D Jensen; Virginia P Quinn; Joanne E Schottinger; Ann G Zauber; Reinier Meester; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Stacey Fedewa; Michael Goodman; Robert H Fletcher; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Predicting Non-Adherence with Outpatient Colonoscopy Using a Novel Electronic Tool that Measures Prior Non-Adherence.

Authors:  Daniel M Blumenthal; Gaurav Singal; Shikha S Mangla; Eric A Macklin; Daniel C Chung
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Validation of Models Used to Inform Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines: Accuracy and Implications.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Amy B Knudsen; Tracey L Marsh; V Paul Doria-Rose; Eric Johnson; Chester Pabiniak; Karen M Kuntz; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Diagnostic colonoscopy completion after abnormal fecal immunochemical testing and quality of tests used at 8 Federally Qualified Health Centers in Southern California: Opportunities for improving screening outcomes.

Authors:  Balambal Bharti; Folasade Fola Popoola May; Jesse Nodora; María Elena Martínez; Karina Moyano; Shauntay L Davis; Christian B Ramers; Felipe Garcia-Bigley; Shawne O'Connell; Kevin Ronan; Melissa Barajas; Sheree Gordon; Giselle Diaz; Evelyn Ceja; Meghan Powers; Elva M Arredondo; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.