Literature DB >> 25150704

Probability of high-risk colorectal neoplasm recurrence based on the results of two previous colonoscopies.

Hye Won Park1, Seungbong Han, Ji Young Lee, Hye-Sook Chang, Jaewon Choe, Yunsik Choi, Hoonsub So, Dong-Hoon Yang, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jin-Ho Kim, Jeong-Sik Byeon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for the surveillance colonoscopy interval are largely based on the most recent colonoscopy findings. AIM: We aimed to evaluate differences in the probability of high-risk neoplasm recurrence according to the two previous colonoscopy findings.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from a tertiary-care center. A total of 4,143 subjects who underwent three or more colonoscopies for screening or surveillance purposes from January 2001 to December 2011 were enrolled. We compared the probability of high-risk neoplasm detection on follow-up colonoscopies after the second colonoscopy based on risk categories in both the second and first colonoscopies.
RESULTS: At the final colonoscopy, 370 participants (8.9 %) had high-risk neoplasms. In patients with a normal second colonoscopy, the probability of high-risk neoplasm recurrence was different between those with normal, low-risk, and high-risk findings at the first colonoscopy (3.8, 6.8, and 17.7 %, respectively). The hazard ratio of a high-risk neoplasm at the final colonoscopy for patients with a normal second and low-risk first colonoscopy over a normal second and normal first colonoscopy was 3.07 (95 % CI 2.04-4.64, P < 0.001). The hazard ratio of high-risk neoplasm at the final colonoscopy for patients with a normal second and high-risk first colonoscopy over a normal second with normal first colonoscopy was 7.88 (95 % CI 4.90-12.67, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of high-risk colorectal neoplasm recurrence differs according to the two previous colonoscopy findings. Therefore, surveillance intervals could be adjusted not just only by the most recent colonoscopy findings but also by considering two previous colonoscopy findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25150704     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3334-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  20 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002).

Authors:  Stuart R Cairns; John H Scholefield; Robert J Steele; Malcolm G Dunlop; Huw J W Thomas; Gareth D Evans; Jayne A Eaden; Matthew D Rutter; Wendy P Atkin; Brian P Saunders; Anneke Lucassen; Paul Jenkins; Peter D Fairclough; Christopher R J Woodhouse
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Five-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans.

Authors:  Su Jin Chung; Young Sun Kim; Sun Young Yang; Ji Hyun Song; Donghee Kim; Min Jung Park; Sang Gyun Kim; In Sung Song; Joo Sung Kim
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Raquel E Davila; Elizabeth Rajan; Todd H Baron; Douglas G Adler; James V Egan; Douglas O Faigel; Seng-Ian Gan; William K Hirota; Jonathan A Leighton; David Lichtenstein; Waqar A Qureshi; Bo Shen; Marc J Zuckerman; Trina VanGuilder; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Yield of the second surveillance colonoscopy based on the results of the index and first surveillance colonoscopies.

Authors:  Michael Samuel Morelli; Elizabeth A Glowinski; Ravi Juluri; Cynthia S Johnson; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Jenny Chang-Claude; Christoph M Seiler; Alexander Rickert; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Features of adenoma and colonoscopy associated with recurrent colorectal neoplasia based on a large community-based study.

Authors:  Else-Mariëtte B van Heijningen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Ernst J Kuipers; Evelien Dekker; Wilco Lesterhuis; Frank Ter Borg; Juda Vecht; Vincent De Jonge; Pieter Spoelstra; Leopold Engels; Clemens J M Bolwerk; Robin Timmer; Jan H Kleibeuker; Jan J Koornstra; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Using the results of a baseline and a surveillance colonoscopy to predict recurrent adenomas with high-risk characteristics.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; Carol A Burke; H Gilbert Welch; Robert W Haile; Robert S Sandler; E Robert Greenberg; Dennis J Ahnen; Robert S Bresalier; Richard I Rothstein; Bernard Cole; Leila A Mott; John A Baron
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Short- and long-term risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence among whites and blacks.

Authors:  Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Chyke Doubeni; Hassan Brim; Hassan Ashktorab; Robert E Schoen; Samir Gupta; Aline Charabaty; Elaine Lanza; Duane T Smoot; Elizabeth Platz; Amanda J Cross
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  New occurrence and recurrence of neoplasms within 5 years of a screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Benjamin Avidan; Amnon Sonnenberg; Thomas G Schnell; Jack Leya; Adrienne Metz; Stephen J Sontag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  5 in total

1.  Does Colon Polyp Surveillance Improve Patient Outcomes?

Authors:  David Lieberman; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 12.045

5.  Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Heisser; Le Peng; Korbinian Weigl; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-11-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.